Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Year: 2003 Page 12 of about 4,629 results (0.096 seconds)

Narendra H. Khurana and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Police and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3393; 2004(2)MhLj72

..... special legislation. but in absence of any such special law we do not see that the prosecution can contend or prove that such obscene act would come within the purview of section 294 of the indian penal code without cogent and conclusive evidence to establish annoyance caused to others.12. we now turn to the second ..... concerned authorities.11. therefore, we answer the first limb of the question raised in this reference in the negative and state that act per se indecent and obscene would not warrant prosecution under section 294 of the indian penal code in absence of express evidence of annoyance by any of the persons who attended such show. ..... of the indian penal code. however, in our considered view, the law enforcement machinery has ample power to proceed under different laws, for instance, section 110 of the bombay police act, 1951, or for that matter, rules for licensing and controlling places of public amusement (other than cinema) and performances for public amusement including melas .....

K. Balakrishnan Vs. K. Kamalam and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC1257; 2004(2)ALD79(SC); 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)551; 2004(1)ALT51(SC); 2004(2)AWC1462(SC); (SCSuppl)2004(3)CHN81; 2004(1)CTC146; 2004(1)CTLJ406(SC); (2004)186CTR(SC)209; J

..... minor donee. consequently, conclusion has to follow that the gift having been duly accepted in law and thus being complete, it was irrevocable under section 126 of the transfer of property act. section 126 prohibits revocation of a validly executed gift except in circumstances mentioned therein. the gift was executed in 1945. it remained in force for about ..... of the gift and its revocability.14. a minor in law suffers from certain specified disabilities. a minor is not competent to enter into a contract. section 11 of the contract act states :-'11. who are competent to contract. - every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to ..... the donor and while he is still capable of giving.if the donee dies before acceptance, the gift is void.'[underlining by the court]16. section 123 of the transfer of property act provides the mode of effecting transfer by gift which reads:-'123. transfer how effected. - for the purpose of making a gift of immovable property .....

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. K. Srinivasulu Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(10)SC226; 2003(10)SCALE1100; (2003)12SCC660

..... the four accused were charged for commission of offence punishable under section 302 read with section 120b ipc. 5. the trial court placed reliance on the evidence of eyewitnesses and held that the accusations were clearly established so far as a-1 and a-2 are concerned. but acting on the statement made by the public prosecutor that there ..... was no definite material against a-3 and a-4, directed their acquittal. all the four were also held not guilty of offence punishable under section 120b ipc.6. the convicted accused persons filed appeal before ..... the real question and it has concluded that since no particular injury could be attributed to any particular witness the proper course should be to alter the conviction to section 326 ipc. this reasoning cannot be justified as either sound logic or on any settled principle of criminal jurisprudence. from the conduct of the accused before and .....

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Prem Chand Sharma

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... /car/jeep shall be considered to be a driving licence for a light motor vehicle as per the definition of a light motor vehicle as contained in section 2(21) of the motor vehicles act, 1988. this commission also expressed the same view in complaint case no. 18 of 1998, inderjit gulati v. united india insurance company, decided on 8.10.1999 .....

Krushna Ganpat Duhijod Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR780; 2004(4)BomCR177; [2004(101)FLR479]; 2004(2)MhLj844

..... the report wherein it is stated that the authorities then incharge of the affairs of respondent no. 2 did not issue chargesheet to the petitioner although he has committed serious act of misconduct. in the submission of mr. pradhan, the contentions of the petitioner stand fully supported and corroborated by the contents of this report and on this count also, the .....

Vee Nissan Electronics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2004(164)ELT3(SC); (2004)10SCC190

ORDER1. This appeal deals with classification of the Rack Series System manufactured by the appellant-Concern. The system manufactured by the appellants consists of the following :-'(a) Turntable(b) Cassette Deck(c) Amplifier(d) Graphic Equalizer(f) Speakers'2. The question is whether the said system falls under old Tariff Item 33F or the residuary item. The old Tariff Item 33F reads as follows :-'Tariff Item 33F - Musical Systems.33F Musical Systems commercially known as stereo or hi-fi systems, namely - (1) Stereo or hi-fi amplifiers(2) Speakers and speaker systems housed in acoustically designed enclosures which are ordinarily used as attachments with stereos or hi-fi systems, or with radios (including transistor sets), turners, radiograms, gramophones (including record players) and tape recorders or players (including cassette recorders or players) having in-built stereo devices.' 3. Thus any musical system which is commercially known as a 'Stereo or hi-fi system' falls within this...

Cascade Systems Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Customs

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(91)ECC586; 2004(165)ELT400(Kar)

..... the recovery proceedings in respect of demands which are the subject matter of appeal till the application filed by the petitioner under the proviso to section 35f of the act is finally disposed of.12. all these judgments and the circulars referred to above deal with pending stay proceedings. they do not directly deal ..... ,950.00 is not to be demanded from him as the goods imported are populated circuit boards classifiable under chapter heading 8473.30 of the customs tariff act. petitioner requested the additional commissioner to adjourn personal hearing from 23.10.2001 to the first week of november 2001. however, the additional commissioner, ignoring the ..... had imported processors (integrated circuits) and got them cleared by customs duty as applicable to integrated circuits falling under chapter heading 8542.19 of the customs act. additional commissioner of customs, bangalore issued a notice dated 11.1.1999 asking the petitioner to show cause as to why customs duty amounting to 3,42 .....

Gyan Chand JaIn Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Reported in : (2004)84TTJ(Jodh.)337

..... , the resultant assessed income was at a loss of rs. 96,776 (sic). the ao noted that search under section 132 of the act was conducted in october, 1987 at the residence of the assessee and in his statement the assessee stated that the explosives purchased at rs. 1,73,107 on 27th july, 1987 and rs. 1,49,488 on 24th aug ..... the income which he noted at rs. 3,22,587 in the form of unrecorded purchases. the ao, therefore, levied penalty of rs, 1,47,574 under section 271(1)(c) of the it act being 100 per cent of the tax sought to be evaded.4.2 aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the cit(a) and submitted that ..... the assessee that the entries were made on the basis of the payment. it is also seen that the amendment had been made in expln. 4 to section 271(1)(c) by the finance act. (no. 2) w.e.f. 1st april, 2003 and it has been inserted that : "in any case where the amount of income in respect of which particulars .....

Sophisticated Marble and Granite Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(165)ELT353Tri(Mum.)bai

..... level of fine and penalty determined by the tribunal in the earlier orders. it has dismissed customs application no. 27/2002 and other applications of the commissioner under section 130a of the act on the ground that determination of fine was a finding of fact. similarly, while allowing the writ petition no. 4124 of 2002 of marmo classic, it has ..... . he also points to instructions in the manual that the fine has to be equal to these norms or the margin of profit whichever is higher.6. section 125(2) of the act provides that the fine for redemption of goods ordered to be confiscated cannot exceed the market price of the goods and excise duty payable thereupon. therefore, any ..... this limit cannot be said to be contrary to law.similarly, the penalty on the importer will not be illegal if it is within the limits specified by section 112 of the act. the margin of profit, which is a contentions issue in this appeal, is only a working rule that the department accepts. the reason for basing fine upon .....

J.M. Narayana and ors. Vs. Corporation of the City of Bangalore, by It ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR60

..... submission that the corporation was under an obligation to levy a tax on buildings or lands or both situated within its limits referred to in the act as property tax. section 110 of the act, argued mrs. patil, deals with general exemptions and inter alia provides that lands which are registered as lands used for the agricultural purpose in the ..... of the suit. as a result of such i inclusion, the taxes applicable within the corporation limits would by operation of law and in particular section 4 sub-section 4 of the municipal corporation act become applicable to the extended area also. even assuming that the land in question was agricultural land before its inclusion in the corporation limits, the ..... the property or rs. 1,000/-whichever was higher. the market value of the property was in turn to be decided in terms of section 7 of the act. he drew our attention to section 7(2)(b) to argue that where the suit land was an entire estate or a definite share of an estate paying annual revenue to .....