Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-04-1989
Reported in : 41(1990)DLT212
..... case the lt. governor is not exercising any appellate powers. in any case, the lt. governor can effectively exercise his statutory powers. under section 4 of the police act, either himself or through another police officer, but no one else.(36) it was also submitted by shri malik that the effect of issuing ..... of control. direction or supervision, then the said power shall be exercisable by that superior officer subject to the superintendence of the administrator. section 64 of the delhi police act stipulates that superior police officer may himself perform duties which are imposed on a subordinate officer.. a superior officer, if exercises any duties ..... police under the provisions of criminal procedure code. is not subject to any superintendence.the power of superintendence is, in our opinion, expressly contained in section 4 of the delhi police act. which reads as follows :4.the superintendence of the delhi police throughout delhi shall vest in, and be exercisable by the administrator and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-04-1989
Reported in : AIR1989SC2259; 1989(2)ARBLR444(SC); 69(1990)CLT476(SC); JT1989(4)SC86; 1989(2)SCALE756; (1989)4SCC578; [1989]SuppSCR366; [1989]Supp1SCR366
..... of the proceedings'. by reason of the inclusive definition of 'court' in section 2(a) of the act is applicable to arbitration. the question, therefore, is as to when the proceeding before an arbitrator is deemed to commence. it has not been ..... .1. this appeal by special leave by the state of orissa is directed against the judgment of the orissa high court rejecting its appeal under section 39 of the arbitration act the respondent executed certain work under a written agreement with the appellant and a dispute arose thereunder which was referred to arbitration. the arbitrator made ..... ltd. : [1989]1scr318 .6. before proceeding further it will be helpful to examine the language of section 3 of the interest act, 1978 which states that in cases where the conditions mentioned in clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (1) are satisfied the court may allow interest for the past period terminating on 'the date of institution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Oct-04-1989
Reported in : AIR1990P& H305
..... the landlord had not applied for enhancement of the compensation but the tenant had. the delhi high court enhanced the rate of compensation and gave benefit of the amending act of 1984 and apportioned the compensation as stated above. it was observed as under (at p. 172 of air) :--'now, the question arises how the compensation ..... to agricultural land measuring 49 acres. 1 kanal. 15 marias situated in the revenue estate of sirsa which was acquired under the provisions of the land acquisition act. the tenant was allowed one-fourth of the compensation. the district judge hadignored the case of the tenants on the ground that they were lessees and not tenants ..... april 26. 1976. he referred the dispute of apportionment of the amount of compensation between the landlord and the tenant under s. 30 of the land acquisition act to the civil court. the president tribunal improvement trust, hissar announced his judgment on september 29,1987 allowing one-eighth of the compensation of the land measuring 307 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Oct-04-1989
Reported in : AIR1990P& H144; (1990)97PLR78
..... to the persons concerned under the regulations promulgated by the chandigarh administration on december 29, 1979, in exercise of the powers conferred by s. 74 of the haryana housing board act, 1971, as extended to the union territory of chandigarh, and with the previous sanction of the administrator. in chapter iii are the regulations which provide the procedure for disposal of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-04-1989
Reported in : 1991CriLJ2293
..... the result to the vendor from whom the sample has been taken and also to the person, whose name, address and other particulars have been disclosed under section 14-a of the act, within 10 days from the receipt of the report from the public analyst).'rule 9-a further amended in july, 1984 and word 'immediately' was substituted ..... passed by sri r.s. pandey ivth additional sessions judge, rae bareli whereby he had maintained the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under sections 7, 16 of the prevention of food adulteration act.2. the prosecution case is that on 23-2-1981 at about 12 o'clock sri ram shanker food inspector visited the shop of the ..... 2 k.p. srivastava. the judicial magistrate, special court, rae bareli by his order dated 26-11-1981 convicted the applicant under sections 7/16 of the prevention of food adulteration act (hereinafter referred to as the act) and sentenced him to 6 months' rigorous imprisonment and further awarded a fine of rs. 1000/-.4. aggrieved by the said order .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-04-1989
Reported in : AIR1991HP29
..... rejecting the similar prayer was also challenged. obviously, the defendants supported the trial court order and pressed into service the provisions of section 40 of the himachal pradesh consolidation of holdings act, 1953.7. after hearing the parties, the appellate court accepted the appeal and set aside the order of the trial court. ..... more submission raised by shri h. m. sharma, learned counsel for the appellants. it is stated that the proceedings under the himachal pradesh consolidation of holdings act, 1953 had been over before the filing of the present suit. therefore, the suit was maintainable. i see substance in this submission. consolidation proceedings remain in ..... has been envisaged nor can the same be inferred being totally foreign to the object and implementation of the consolidation of holdings scheme. even otherwise, official acts are presumed to have been done in the manner prescribed and that very presumption is applicable to the present case. therefore, the assertion of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-04-1989
Reported in : I(1990)ACC11; 1990ACJ461; AIR1990Delhi121; 1990(18)DRJ123
..... judgment of the tribunal itself. in para no. 16 of the judgment on page 7 the tribunal has held on the basis of the statement of rw-1 mohd. hussain section officer, office of the controller general of defense accounts, new delhi, where the deceased was employed as deputy controller general and getting a gross salary of rs. 1,326.50 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-04-1989
Reported in : ILR1989Delhi523
..... judgment of the tribunal itself. in para no.16 of the judgment on page 7 the tribunal has held on the basis of the statement of rw-1 mohd. hussain section officer, office of the controller general of defense accounts, new delhi, were the accused was employed as deputy controller general and getting a gross sale of rs. 1,326.50 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-04-1989
Reported in : 1989(2)SCALE791; (1989)4SCC640a
..... the assistance of the court, and to prove by evidence which is in law admissible that the goods transported by him fell within the order issued under section 157(3) of the act. the rules framed by the government relating to the procedure to be followed in giving effect to the exemptions on april 15, 1939, do not ..... from the judgment and order of the division bench of the high court of karnataka dated 24th march, 1988.3. there was a notification under section 98(2) of the city of bangalore municipal corporation act, 1949 dated 4th march, 1975 levying octroi, inter alia, on food drinks (including milk food) brought into the municipal limits of bangalore for ..... '. the appellant then applied to the municipality for refund of the amount paid pursuant to the exemption. granted by the government of india under the u.p. municipalities act, 1916. the respondent declined to refund the amount. in an action against the respondent, the trial court decreed the claim. the high court affirmed the order of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-03-1989
Reported in : 40(1990)DLT97; 1990(18)DRJ129; 1990(26)ECC317
..... that they be released on bail. even then in the later case, namely ; nimeon sangma and others (supra) in cases of graver offences viz those under sections 302 and 395 i pc, the supreme court did not order release but gave time bound directions for expeditious trial.(8) the case of kadra pehadiya and others v ..... clearly indicate as to whether articles allegedly recovered from the possession of the petitioner fall within the definition of heroin or morphine within the contemplation of the aforesaid act and further that the petitioner has been suffering from ill health during the period of his custody in jail. it is, thereforee, prayed that the petitioner be ..... santosh duggal, j.(1) the petitioner in this bail petition is accused of offences registered under sections 8, 19, 21 and 29 of the narcotics drugs and psychotropic substance act (for short the 'act'}, section 120 of the indian penal code. the allegations against him are that he was found in possession of 10 grams of smack, 18 ampules of .....
Tag this Judgment!