Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 2003 Page 3 of about 334 results (0.113 seconds)

Feb 06 2003 (SC)

State of Madhya Pradesh and anr. Vs. Bhola @ Bhairon Prasad Raghuvansh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-2003

Reported in : AIR2003SC1191; JT2003(1)SC594; 2003(2)MPHT377; 2003MPLJ37(SC); 2003(1)SCALE689; (2003)3SCC1; [2003]1SCR906; 2003(2)LC828(SC)

..... chapters v-a, vi and vii and section 216-a, 224 and 225 (if it is a case of an escape from a jail), 231, 232, ..... rule prohibits release of specified classes of offenders in relation to the offences for which they are convicted and thus defeats the very object of the act.23. section 9(4) which enables framing rules to classify the offenders impliedly permits their classification not merely on the basis of their antecedents and their conduct in ..... prisoners shall not be released under act:- (a) those convicted of offences under the madhya barat vagrants, habitual offenders and criminals (restrictions and settlement) act, 1952, or any law in force in any region of the state corresponding to the said act, or the explosive substances act, 1908 or under the following chapters or sections of the indian penal code, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2003 (SC)

Yusuf @ Babu Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-23-2003

Reported in : JT2003(3)SC585; 2003(4)SCALE428

..... to 5 years' rl with fine of rs. 500/- each; in default a simple imprisonment for 3 months was awarded. they were also sentenced under section 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 and were sentenced to rl for a period of 2 years with fine of rs. 500/-; with default clause to suffer further imprisonment for 3 ..... above were the occupants of that van. they did not have any licence to carry the said explosives, hence, the van with the explosives was seized and the accusedpersons were taken into custody. a case under sections 4 to 6 of the explosive substances act, 1908 was registered in fir no. 195/90. subsequently it came to the knowledge of ..... investigating agency that the place where the explosive material was sized, was a notified area declared under section 2(1)(f) of the tada act, hence, the provisions of the said act were also invoked. after completing the investigation, a chargesheet was filed against the appellant and the tada .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2003 (SC)

Ramakant Dattatraya Deshpande Vs. Dadu Bhagoji Patil (D) Through Lrs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2003

Reported in : AIR2004SC1324; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)231; 2003(10)SCALE941; (2004)1SCC460; 2004(2)LC1084(SC)

..... the high court, therefore, was not justified in annulling all those orders of original, appellate and revisional authorities and setting aside the orders dropping proceedings under section 32g of the act. it is submitted that the tenant had lost his right to purchase land by paying price to the landlord and, in fact, no such right was ..... through his natural guardian, terminated the tenancy of the tenant on the ground of continuous defaults in payment of rent. he thereafter instituted proceedings under section 29(2) of the act and obtained possession of the lands. when the tenant tried to interfere with the possession of the landlord, a civil suit was filed in the court ..... , we do not consider it necessary to go into the purely academic question as to whether in case of a minor landlord, 'tillers' day' under section 32 of the act gets postponed or not and whether such a minor landlord during his minority, after 'tillers' day' can terminate the tenancy for default in payment of rent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2003 (SC)

Sushil Murmu Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2003

Reported in : AIR2004SC394; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)275; 2004(1)BLJR195; 2004CriLJ658; [2005(3)JCR193(SC)]; JT2003(10)SC340; 2003(10)SCALE670; (2004)2SCC338

..... others involved in the crime and similarly situated have received the benefit of life imprisonment or if the offence is only constructive, being under section 302, read with section 149, or again the accused has acted suddenly under another's instigation without premeditation, perhaps the court may humanely opt for life, even like where a just cause or real ..... punishment other than death, the reason why sentence of death was not passed had to be stated in the judgment. after the amendment of section 367(5) of the old code by act 26 of 1955, position is clear that the normal penalty is imprisonment for life. it can be awarded in the presence of extenuating circumstances ..... and the reactions and choose the appropriate sentence to be imposed.6. it should be borne in mind that before the amendment of section 367(5) of the old code, by the criminal procedure code (amendment) act, 1955 (26 of 1955) which came into force on 1.1.1956, on a conviction for an offence punishable with death, if .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2003 (SC)

Mohammed Haroon Ansari and anr. Vs. the District Collector, Ranga Redd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2003

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC471(SC); 2004(2)CTC234; 2003(10)SCALE693; (2004)1SCC491

..... of it. however, as a precautionary measure, the intensity of blasting must be kept at the minimum by fixing the limit of number holes, depth of hole and quantity of explosive per blasting. (5) there is no impact on osmansagar lake due to blasting beyond 1 km radius.' 4. however, the high court, after noticing various aspects attributed to in the ..... vibrations for the nature of blasting done at the quarries was such that it was below the lowest detectable limit of the instrument (0.51 mm/sec) and hence below the permissible limit (10 mm/sec for dominant frequency 25 hz) for the objects of historic importance and sensitive structures. therefore, the glsr is not likely to be affected by blasting at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2003 (SC)

The Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society V ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-2003

Reported in : AIR2004SC448; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)108; [2004]118CompCas253(SC); (2004)1CompLJ339(SC); 2004(2)MhLj581; (2004)2MLJ94(SC); 2004MPLJ242(SC); 2003(10)SCALE635; (2004)1SCC305; 2004(1

..... one where the question to be considered is as, to the exclusion of jurisdiction of civil court in view of the provisions of section 90 read with section 156 of the act. provisions of 1986 act, as already made clear above, apply in addition to the other provisions available under ether enactments. it follows that the remedies available ..... by any court in respect of anything which is done or intended to be done by or under this act.' 8. section 3 of the 1986 act reads:-'section 3. act not in derogation of any other law - the provisions of this act shall be in addition to and not in, derogation of the provisions of any other law for the ..... appellant and dismissed the appeals filed by the respondents. the state commission held that complaints filed by the respondents were themselves not maintainable having regard to section 90 of the act. hence, the state commission did not deal with the other contentions.4. aggrieved by the order of the state commission, the respondents approached the national .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2003 (SC)

Uma Devi Nambiar and ors. Vs. T.C. Sidhan (Dead)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-2003

Reported in : AIR2004SC1772; 2004(1)BLJR583; (SCSuppl)2004(2)CHN56; 2004(2)CTC287; [2004(3)JCR208(SC)]; JT2003(10)SC470; 2004(2)KLT75(SC); (2004)3MLJ7(SC); 2003(10)SCALE624; (2004)2SCC32

..... not ordinarily differ from that of proving any other document except as to the special requirement of attestation prescribed in the case of a will by section 63. succession act. the onus of proving the will is on the propounder and in the absence of suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of the will, proof of ..... clause. this is regulated by the well-known maxim 'cum duo inter se pugantia reperiuntur in testamentary ultimum ratumestest'. this principle is also contained in section 88 of the act which together with its illustrations, provides as under:'88. the last of two inconsistent clauses prevails. - where two clauses of gifts in a will are ..... k.k. venugopal, learned senior counsel the judgments of the district court, kozhikode and the high court suffer from irreparable infirmities. in the proceeding under section 192 of the act, there was no scope for adjudicating the genuineness of the will, on the face of several orders passed by various courts including high court of kerala .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2003 (FN)

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-10-2003

..... requirements for persons who fund electioneering communications. bcra s use of this new term is not, however, limited to the disclosure context: a later section of the act (bcra 203, which amends feca 316(b)(2)) restricts corporations and labor unions funding of electioneering communications. plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the new ..... to account for the particular associational burdens imposed by 323(a) when applying the appropriate level of scrutiny. footnote 44 the fact that the post-1990 explosion in soft-money spending on federal electioneering was accompanied by a series of efforts in congress to clamp down on such uses of soft money (culminating ..... in this litigation and congress strong interest in preventing circumvention of otherwise valid contribution limits. the proliferation of sham issue ads has driven the soft-money explosion. parties have sought out every possible way to fund and produce these ads with soft money: they have labored to bring them under the fec s .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2003 (SC)

State of H.P. Vs. M.P. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-09-2003

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)283; 2004(1)BLJR429; JT2003(10)SC32; 2003(10)SCALE522; (2004)2SCC349

..... it is not every offence committed by a public servant while engaged in the performance of his official duty, which is entitled to the protection of section 197(1), an act constituting an offence, directly and reasonably connected with his official duty will require sanction for prosecution and the said provision.'use of the expression, 'official duty ..... and also amrik singh's case (supra) that it is not every offence committed by a public servant which requires sanction for prosecution under section 197 of the code, nor even every act done by him while he is actually engaged in the performance of his official duties. following the above legal position it was held in harihar ..... . v. h.s. kochar : 1979crilj1367 it was held : 'the words, any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty' employed in section 197(1) of the code, are capable of a narrow as well as a wide interpretation. if these words are construed too narrowly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2003 (SC)

Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and anr. Vs. Municipal Corporation, Gre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-09-2003

Reported in : AIR2004SC416; JT2003(10)SC1; 2004(3)MhLj437; 2003(10)SCALE56; (2004)1SCC625; 2004(1)LC676(SC)

..... trading. the general public has a stake in showing how and why the hawking trade should be regulated. the power conferred upon the commissioner by section 313-a of the act to grant licences to hawkers is in the nature of a discretion coupled with a duty. it is therefore essential that the said power should be ..... case (supra). in that case, the municipal commissioner had suggested framing of a scheme on the following terms: ' as per the provision of the section 61(o) of the bombay municipal corporation act, the removal of obstruction and projections in or upon streets, bridges and other public places is an obligatory duty of the corporation. the hawkers together ..... adulterated or unhygienic food could be sold. this court held that hawkers had to comply with the municipal licensing regulations and the provisions of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954. this court lastly extended the business hours from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. this court then laid down fallowing modalities: '(a) as far .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //