Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: us supreme court Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 70 results (0.371 seconds)

Maryland Vs. Pringle

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that the probable-cause standard is a practical, nontechnical conception that deals with the factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act. illinois v. gates, 462 u. s. 213 , 231 (1983) (quoting brinegar, supra, at 175 176); see, e.g. , ornelas v. united states, 517 u. s. 690 , 695 (1996); united states .....

The Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society V ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC448; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)108; [2004]118CompCas253(SC); (2004)1CompLJ339(SC); 2004(2)MhLj581; (2004)2MLJ94(SC); 2004MPLJ242(SC); 2003(10)SCALE635; (2004)1SCC305; 2004(1

..... one where the question to be considered is as, to the exclusion of jurisdiction of civil court in view of the provisions of section 90 read with section 156 of the act. provisions of 1986 act, as already made clear above, apply in addition to the other provisions available under ether enactments. it follows that the remedies available ..... by any court in respect of anything which is done or intended to be done by or under this act.' 8. section 3 of the 1986 act reads:-'section 3. act not in derogation of any other law - the provisions of this act shall be in addition to and not in, derogation of the provisions of any other law for the ..... appellant and dismissed the appeals filed by the respondents. the state commission held that complaints filed by the respondents were themselves not maintainable having regard to section 90 of the act. hence, the state commission did not deal with the other contentions.4. aggrieved by the order of the state commission, the respondents approached the national .....

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

..... requirements for persons who fund electioneering communications. bcra s use of this new term is not, however, limited to the disclosure context: a later section of the act (bcra 203, which amends feca 316(b)(2)) restricts corporations and labor unions funding of electioneering communications. plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the new ..... to account for the particular associational burdens imposed by 323(a) when applying the appropriate level of scrutiny. footnote 44 the fact that the post-1990 explosion in soft-money spending on federal electioneering was accompanied by a series of efforts in congress to clamp down on such uses of soft money (culminating ..... in this litigation and congress strong interest in preventing circumvention of otherwise valid contribution limits. the proliferation of sham issue ads has driven the soft-money explosion. parties have sought out every possible way to fund and produce these ads with soft money: they have labored to bring them under the fec s .....

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(10)SC485; 2003(10)SCALE202; (2004)11SCC26

..... trade. no doubt conditions restrictive of freedom of trade among the states will frequently involve a discrimination; but that is not essential or decisive. an act may contravene section 92 though it operates in restriction both of intra-state and of inter-state trade.'149. however, in india part xiii of the constitution relates both ..... but it would depend upon the nature of the mischief which is sought to be remedied. for the aforementioned purpose dealing in liquor, trading in dangerous goods as explosives, trafficking in women, toutism, essential commodities and realisation of tax have been placed in the same category. [see har shankar v. dy excise commer. of taxation ..... impermissible.81. a subsidiary question which arises for consideration is as to whether the state of punjab, having regard to section 33a of the punjab act, could levy such duty. in sub-section (1) of section 33a provision has been made permitting the state to continue to levy any duty which it had lawfully been levying .....

Liverpool and London S.P. and I Asson. Ltd. Vs. M.V. Sea Success I and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(9)SC218; 2003(10)SCALE1; (2004)9SCC512

..... incorporating 'goods or materials wherever supplied to a ship for her operation or maintenance' as a maritime claim. having regard to the provisions contained in section 6 of admiralty court act, 1840 and section 5 of admiralty court act, 1861 it was held:'in other words, what is now called a claim in respect of goods or materials supplied to a ship for her ..... england was, however, extended to cover matters in respect of which there was no maritime lien, i.e., necessaries supplied to a foreign ship. in terms of section 6 of the admiralty act, 1861, the high court of admiralty was empowered to assume jurisdiction over foreign ships in respect of claims to cargo carried into any port in england or wales ..... of an insurance policy; 'unless the ship is benefited the ship should not pay.' in re petition of insurance co. of pennsylvanis, 22. f.109, 116 (n.d.n.y.1884), aff'd sub non. insurance co. of pennsylvania v. the proceeds of the sale of the barge waubauschene, 24 f. 559 (c.c.n.d.n.y.1885). it .....

Barnhart Vs. Thomas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... c. 1382c(a)(3)(b). for simplicity s sake, we will refer only to the title ii provisions, but our analysis applies equally to title xvi. section 423(d)(2)(a) establishes two requirements for disability. first, an individual s physical or mental impairment must render him unable to do his previous work. ..... (o connor, j., concurring) ( to be sure the secretary faces an administrative task of staggering proportions in applying the disability benefits provisions of the social security act. perfection in processing millions of such claims annually is impossible ). it is true that, under the ssa s interpretation, a worker with severely limited capacity who has ..... the united states court of appeals for the third circuit [november 12, 2003] justice scalia delivered the opinion of the court. under the social security act, the social security administration (ssa) is authorized to pay disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income to persons who have a disability. a person qualifies .....

S. Samuel, M.D., Harrisons Malayalam and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC218; JT2003(8)SC413; (2004)1SCC256; [2003]134STC610(SC)

..... .4. on june 20, 1972 the central government issued a notification for making a delegation of power in favour of the state governments the notification reads as under:-essential commodities act section 3(a) clauses (a) to (f), (h) (i) and (j) -central government's power to make orders in respect of and in relation to foodstuffs - ..... foodstuffs, meaning thereby that the said notification delegated the powers by the central government to the state governments in regard to certain clauses of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the e.c. act but only in relation to 'foodstuffs'. in the notifications dated june 20, 1972 and june 9, 1978 the specified matters in relation to ..... order, 1977 (g.o. ms.no. 180, food, dated 20th august, 1977) xxxxx xxxxx now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by section 3 of the essential commodities act, 1955 (central act 10 of 1955 read with the government of india, ministry of agriculture (department of food) order no. gsr.316(e), dated the 20th june, 1972 .....

Sarva Shramik Sangh Vs. Indian Smelting and Refining Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC269; [2004(101)FLR635]; JT2003(8)SC243; (2003)IIILLJ1156SC; (2004)1MLJ87(SC); (2003)10SCC455; 2004(86)SLJ64(SC); 2004(1)LC483(SC)

..... of the labour court, to decide complains relating to unfair labour practices described in item 1 of schedule iv and to try offences punishable under, this act.'21. section 28 reads thus:'28. procedure for dealing with complaints relating to unfair labour practices: -(1) where any person has engaged in or is engaging ..... employee concerned was indisputably an employee of the establishment and subsequently it is so disputed, such a question is an incidental question arising under section 32 of the act. even the case pleaded by the respondent union itself is that the appellant establishment had never recognized the workmen mentioned in exhibit 'a' as ..... whether the concept of automatic absorption of contract labour in the establishment of the principal employer on issuance of the abolition notification, is implied in section 10 of the clra act; andb. whether on a contractor engaging contract labour in connection with the work entrusted to him by a principal employer, the relationship of master .....

Durga Prasad Gupta Vs. the State of Rajasthan Through C.B.i.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 97(2004)CLT489(SC); JT2003(Suppl1)SC586; 2003(8)SCALE107; (2003)12SCC257; 2004(1)LC62(SC)

..... 1. appellant was found guilty of offences punishable under section 5 of terrorist and disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987 (in short the 'tada act'), sections 4 and 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 (in short the 'explosive act') and section 9b of explosives act, 1884 (in short the 'act') read with rule 115 of the explosives rules, 1983 (in short the 'rules'). 2. ..... with sections 3(1), 5 and 6 of tada act, sections 3, 4 and 5 and 6 of the explosives act and section 9b of the act and section 3(3) and 6 of tada act, sections 4 and 5 and 6 of explosive act and section 9b of the act. accused krishna gopal soni has committed offence punishable under section 9b of the act.15. ..... him and he was falsely implicated.16. learned trial judge found the accused guilty for offences punishable under section 5 of the tada act, sections 4 and 5 of the explosive act and section 9b of the act, after considering the evidence. he was sentenced to undergo five years imprisonment and to pay a fine of .....

Vivek Gupta Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)1012; JT2003(Suppl1)SC614; 2003(8)SCALE100; (2003)8SCC628; 2004(1)LC140(SC)

..... transaction, or persons accused of different offence committed in the course of the same transaction may be charged and tried together. applying the provisions of sections 3 and 4 of the act and sections 220 and 223 of the code of criminal procedure it must be held that the appellant and his co-accused may be tried by the special ..... judge while the remaining conspirators who are also charged of the same offence will be tried by another court, because they are not charged of any offence specified in section 3 of the act.16. reliance was placed by the respondent on the judgment in union of india v. i.c. lala : : [1973]3scr818 but counsel for the appellant ..... under the i.p.c.5. to appreciate the force of the rival submissions, it is necessary to notice the relevant provisions of the act and the code of criminal procedure. section 3 and section 4 of the act read as follows :-'3. power to appoint special judges.- (1) the central government or the state government may, by notification in the .....