Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 2003 Page 27 of about 334 results (0.125 seconds)

Arm Group Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Waldorf Restaurant and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC4106; [2003(3)JCR59(SC)]; JT2003(3)SC450; 2003(3)SCALE499; (2003)6SCC423; [2003]3SCR222

..... eng chick wong was the sub-tenant, became the asset or property of the firm from the year 1954 when the partnership was registered.35. under section 14 of the partnership act 1932, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, property exclusively belonging to a person, on his entering into partnership with others, does not ..... one of initial jurisdiction of the court to entertain the proceedings. thus in this very matter, the obstacle was jurisdictional and the exclusionary operation of section 14 of the limitation act was attracted'.28. we now take up for consideration the hotly contested issue between the parties on the allege claim of the firm to the status ..... the learned single judge therefore came to the conclusion that the firm cannot claim status of a protected tenant directly under the landlord on the provisions of section 13(2) of the act of 1950. for better appreciation of the ratio of the judgment of the learned single judge, its relevant part deserves to be reproduced:'in those .....

The State of Maharashtra and P.C. Singh Vs. Dr. Praful B. Desai and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC2053; 2003(1)ALD(Cri)848; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)118; 2003CriLJ2033; 2003(2)CTC787; JT2003(3)SC382; 2003(2)MhLj868; 2003MPLJ434(SC); RLW2003(2)SC268; 2003(3)SCALE554; (200

..... the respondent on the word 'presence'. one must also take note of the definition of the term 'evidence' as defined in the indian evidence act. section 3 of the indian evidence act reads as follows:'evidence--evidence means and includes--(1) all statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses, in ..... were also cited with approval in the case of state v. s.j. chowdhury : . in this case it was held that the evidence act was an ongoing act and the word 'handwriting' in section 45 of that act was construed to include 'typewriting'. these principles were also applied in the case of sil import usa v. exim aides silk exporters : 1999crilj2276 ..... . in this case the words 'notice in writing', in section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, were construed to include a notice by fax. on the same principle courts have interpret, over a period of time, various terms and phrases. to .....

S.M. Nilajkar and ors. Vs. Telecom, District Manager, Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3553; 2003(3)ALT17(SC); 2003(2)AWC1648(SC); [2003(97)FLR608]; JT2003(3)SC436; (2003)IILLJ359SC; 2003(3)MhLj9; 2003MPLJ529(SC); 2003(3)SCALE533; (2003)4SCC27; [2003

..... because of failure on the part of respondent employer to allege and prove that the termination of employment fell within sub-clause (bb) of clause (oo) of section 2 of the act.17. it was submitted on behalf of the respondent that on account of delay in raising the dispute by the appellants the high court was justified in denying ..... by the workmen cannot be said to be delayed or suffering from lapse particularly when the law does not prescribe any period of limitation for raising a limitation under section 10 of the act. it was, therefore, submitted that the award as given by the tribunal was not liable to be interfered with. on behalf of the employer-respondent, the ..... the workmen (respondents before it) were employed under a project of the telecom department and were, therefore, covered by sub-clause (bb) of clause (oo) of section 2 of the act. it was a clear case of termination of services of the workmen as a result of non-renewal of contract of employment on the expiry of the contract. the .....

Mohd. Aslam @ Bhure Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3413; JT2003(3)SC426; 2003(3)SCALE466; (2003)4SCC1; [2003]3SCR143; (2003)2UPLBEC1806

..... course of the judgement of this court in m.ismail faruqui's case [supra]. if land is transferred to any other body or trust as provided under section 6 of the act at this stage further complications may arise. therefore, status quo will have to be maintained until suits are finally disposed of. we hold that the orders of ..... land, even before the resolution of the dispute pending before the court, it may affect the harmony and tranquility that has prevailed for so long.12. section 6(1) of the act enables the central government to transfer its right, title and interest or any of them in the area or any part thereof to any authority or other ..... in terms of the said opinion. however, the reference made to this court having been returned to the president without any opinion thereto and the provisions of section 4(3) of the act by which the pending proceedings stood abated having been declared to be invalid, the suits and the other proceedings along with the interim orders stood revived. therefore .....

Branch Vs. Smith

Court : US Supreme Court

..... such as this one, a federal court has the power to redistrict only because private parties have alleged a violation of the constitution or the voting rights act. sections 2a(c) and 2c do not create independently enforceable private rights of action themselves. rather, both these provisions address the remedy that a federal court ..... (c) would have been expressly repealed by the following language, present in all but the final version of h. r. 2508: "that section 22 of the act of june 18, 1929, entitled 'an act to provide for the fifteenth and subsequent decennial censuses and to provide for apportionment of representatives' (46 stat. 26), as amended, is amended ..... in any subsequent congress thereafter to more than one representative under an apportionment made pursuant to the provisions of subsection (a) of section 22 of the act of june 18, 1929, entitled 'an act to provide for apportionment of representatives' (46 stat. 26), as amended, there shall be established by law a number of districts .....

Rajni Kumar Vs. Suresh Kumar Malhotra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC1322; 2003(4)ALD82(SC); 2003(4)ALLMR(SC)312; 2003(2)AWC1597(SC); 2003(2)CTC59; [2003(4)JCR213(SC)]; JT2003(3)SC307; (2003)134PLR249; RLW2003(2)SC301; 2003(3)SCALE4

..... matter, we do not find any illegality much less jurisdictional error in the order under challenge to warrant interference of this court. inasmuch as having regard to the provisions of section 34 of the c.p.c. and the facts of the case that the liability does not arise out of a commercial transaction, we are of the view that the .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Technoweld Industries

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2003(155)ELT209(SC); (2003)11SCC798

..... tariff item 72.17 deals with wires. reliance is also placed upon chapter note 1(o) which defines 'wire' as cold-formed products in coils, of any uniform solid cross-section along their whole length, which do not conform to the definition on flat-rolled products.7. this court was also taken through the processes, which are undergone by the manufacturer .....

Karamjit Singh Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC1311; 2003CriLJ2021; [2003(3)JCR33(SC)]; JT2003(3)SC249; 2003(3)SCALE398; (2003)5SCC291; [2003]3SCR25; 2003(2)LC799(SC)

..... 11.1990 and on the basis of the rukka brought by naresh, constable, at 1.30 p.m., she registered a case against the appellant under sections 3 and 4 of the explosive substances act and sections 3, 4 and 5 of the tada as fir no. 298 of 1990. pw3 babu khan, head constable deposed that pw11 pratap singh, inspector ..... the basis of which cognizance was taken by the designated court. the learned additional sessions judge (designated court no. 1), new delhi, framed charges under sections 4 and 5 of the explosive substances act and sections 3 and 5 of tada on 12.5.1993. the prosecution in support of its case examined 14 witnesses and filed some documentary evidence. the appellant ..... naresh and on the basis thereof pw1 shashi bala, who was on duty, registered a case against the appellant being fir no. 298 of 1990 under sections 3 and 4 of the explosive substances act and sections 3, 4 and 5 of tada. the appellant was produced in court on the next day, where he was taken on police remand. the appellant .....

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex., Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2003(88)ECC10; 2003(154)ELT10(SC); (2003)9SCC185

ORDER1. These appeals are against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal dated 23rd February, 1999. 2. Briefly stated the facts are :- The appellants are manufacturers of heavy electrical equipment and machinery which they make as per the specific requirements of customers. The Terms and Conditions of sale to the customer contains a warranty clause which provides for free replacement of defective parts within a period of 12 months to 18 months. At the time of sale the appellants charge 2.5%, of the factory cost, as a 'complaint reserve'. This element is added to the price. It is not disputed that the excise duty is paid on the total amount charged to the customer including this element of 2.5% complaint reserve. At a subsequent stage, on some occasions, parts have to be replaced by the appellants during the warranty period. The question for consideration is whether excise duty is payable on the parts which are replaced during the warranty period. Both...

D.P. Lon Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Customs

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC1399; 2003(86)ECC521; 2003(153)ELT269(SC); JT2003(3)SC258; 2003(3)SCALE378; (2003)5SCC97; [2003]2SCR1125; [2003]132STC525(SC)

..... than the normal constructions of folded yarn.'16. the officers have also recorded the statement of shri vipulbhai vasantlal merchant, partner of the appellant under section 14 of the central excises and salt act, 1944 in which he stated that they are engaged in processing of yarn such as crimping/texturising for which they have got one machine of lohia ..... otherwise than as provided in the central excise rules. thus it is seen that the appellant-unit had contravened the provisions of rule 174 read with section 6 of the central excises and salt act, 1944, rule 173f read with rule 9(1) etc. of the central excise rules, 1944 inasmuch as they engaged themselves in the manufacture of ..... heading no. 56.06 of the central excise tariff and, therefore, the appellant is liable to pay duty in contravention of rule 174 read with section 6 etc. of the central excise and salt act, 1944.20. we do not find any error of law or any perversity in the reasoning adopted by the commissioner or by the tribunal on .....