Court : Kerala
..... the 02nd day of january, 2014 order petitioner is accused, in crime no.577 of 2013 of the rajapuram police station for the offences punishable under sec.5 of the explosive substances act, is in custody from 06.12.2013 and seeks bail.2. learned public prosecutor has opposed the application. it is submitted that on 06.12.2013 ..... dismissed b.a.no.8435 of 2013 mainly for the reason that the petitioner was not able to produce any document authorising him to conduct quarry and possess explosives. learned counsel has invited my attention to annexure-a1, communication from the district collector, kasaragod to the district police chief of that district. it is also ..... for interrogation, at all reasonable time and places. b.a.no.8741 of 2013 3 (e) petitioner shall not, except with permission from the appropriate authorities, possess explosives or engage in quarrying operation anywhere. (f) petitioner shall not, during the period of this bail get involved in any offence. (g) in case of violation of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... any offence. unless there is a clear conviction, there cannot be any cancellation or suspension of the licence by virtue of the mandate under section 6e of the explosives act, 1884 and hence the writ petition.2. the learned government pleader points out that, ext.p6 is only a show-cause notice and that the ..... ext.p6 notice dated 11.7.2013 issued under the explosives act/rules proposing to cancel the explosive licence issued to the petitioner with reference to the mishap occurred on 3.4.2013 and pendency of crime no.431/2013 registered against the petitioner under section 286, 304 a of ipc. the case of ..... the following:- kks wp(c).no. 31775 of 2013 (v) --------------------------------------- appendix petitioner(s)' exhibits:- ------------------------------------- exhibit p1 : true copy of the license to manufacture explosives in form -20 issued by the1t respondent to the petitioner. exhibit p2 : true copy of the petition dated0804.2013 issued by the4h respondent to the1t respondent seeking .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... nadapuram police station pending as lp no. 88/2007 on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court, nadapuram. the offence alleged against the petitioner is punishable under section 4 of explosive substances act. after investigation, the final report has been filed. there are altogether eight accused in this case. annexure-4 is the copy of the judgment in s.c no ..... involvement of the accused and that no incriminating crl.m.c no.6004 of 2013 2 circumstance was revealed in evidence. the court below did not question the accused under sec. 313 of cr.p.c.2. in the facts and circumstances of the case, the prosecution against the petitioner and other accused is a futile exercise. no purpose will be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... , in crime no. 813 of 2013 of the chakkarakkal police station for the offences punishable under secs.341, 324 and 326 r/w. sec.34 of the penal code and secs. 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act, are in custody from 07.10.2013 and seek bail.2. learned public prosecutor has submitted that on 22.09.2013, the petitioners and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... no.1208 of 2013 of the panthalam police station for the offences punishable under secs.143, 147, 148, 294(b) and 324 read with sec.149 of the indian penal code and sec.3(a) of the explosives substance act, are in custody and seek bail.2. learned counsel has submitted that to some of the other accused involved in the case, this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... no.1208 of 2013 of the panthalam police station for the offences punishable under secs.143, 147, 148, 294(b) and 324 read with sec.149 of the indian penal code and sec.3(a) of the explosives substance act, are in custody and seek bail.2. learned counsel has submitted that to some of the other accused involved in the case, this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... of shoranur police station, palakkad district refiled as l.p.no. 9/2012 on the file of the assistant sessions court, ottapalam. the offence alleged is punishable under section 9b(1) (b) of explosive act 1884. the crl.m.c is filed seeking to quash final report in crime no. 81/2001 and all further proceedings in l.p.no.9/2012 on the ..... there is absolutely nothing on record to connect the accused with the crime and therefore, the accused is entitled to acquittal. all the accused except the petitioner are acquitted under section 232 cr.p.c. annexure a4 is the copy of the judgment. a perusal of annexure a4 indicate that all the prosecution witnesses examined did not support the prosecution case .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... -------------------------------------------- dated this the 26th day of november 2013 order petitioner is accused in crime no.140 of 2013 of the nadapuram police station for the offences punishable under sec.4 of the explosive substance act, apprehends arrest and has filed this application.2. learned public prosecutor has submitted that petitioner was entrusted by the authorities of the tim girls school to prepare the ..... school ground. petitioner kept explosives there without licence. the same was recovered by the police on 21.02.2013.3. learned counsel submits that the allegations are not true and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... -------------------------------------------- dated this the 26th day of november 2013 order petitioner is accused in crime no.140 of 2013 of the nadapuram police station for the offences punishable under sec.4 of the explosive substance act, apprehends arrest and has filed this application.2. learned public prosecutor has submitted that petitioner was entrusted by the authorities of the tim girls school to prepare the ..... school ground. petitioner kept explosives there without licence. the same was recovered by the police on 21.02.2013.3. learned counsel submits that the allegations are not true and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... 2013 of quilandy police station, kozhikode.2. the offences alleged are punishable under section 4(b) and section 5 of the explosive substances act.3. according to the petitioners, the raw materials/chemicals seized does not form explosives and they are nonexplosive ingrediants in the manufacture of fireworks which does not require ..... police station, kozhikode district dated291-2013. annexure2 copy of the1t petitioner's licence from koilandy municipality dated67-2012 for storage and sale of non explosive raw materials for manufacture of fireworks. annexure3 copy of the list showing physical properties of the raw materials. annexure4 copy of the letter dated181 ..... inspector of police, koilandy police station, koilandy kozhikode district-673620. crl.mc.no. 1478 of 2013 () 3. deputy chief controller of explosives office of the deputy chief controller of explosives, kendriya bhavan, kakkanad, ernakulam-682037. r1 & r2 by public prosecutor sri. reji joseph r3 by adv. sri.p.parameswaran nair, .....
Tag this Judgment!