Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: kerala Page 6 of about 6,356 results (0.419 seconds)

Feb 18 2014 (HC)

Muhammadali Vs. Sub Inspector of Police

Court : Kerala

..... 18th day of february, 2014 order petitioners are accused 1 and 3 in crime no.100 of 2014 of the balussery police station for the offence punishable under section 4 of the explosives substances act, apprehend arrest and have filed this application 2. learned public prosecutor has opposed the application. it is submitted that on 05.02.2014 the police seized 3 iron .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2014 (HC)

M.K.Mohammed Rawther Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... herein is the 2nd accused in c.c.no.75/2010 before the judicial first class magistrate court, alathur. the prosecution is under sections 5 and 8(1) of the explosives act and also sections 286, 337 and 338 of ipc, on the allegation that at about 6.40 pm on 24.5.2009 at the compound of ..... sreekurumba bhagavathy temple the petitioner herein and the co-accused rashly and negligently, without taking any precautionary measures, dealt with and exploded some fire works in connection with a festival, and the said explosion ..... that the petitioner and others intentionally and voluntarily caused some mischief or caused simple and grievous injuries on the body of different persons by explosion. the allegation is that they did the acts negligently, or without taking the required precautionary measures. whether the petitioner and the crl.m.c no.3866 of 2012 3 other co- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2014 (HC)

Sreejith K Vs. Station House Officer

Court : Kerala

..... of 2013 of the panoor police station for the offences punishable under secs. 143, 147, 148, 454, 427 and 153(a) r/w. sec.149 of the penal code and secs. 3 and 5 of the explosives substances act, are in custody from 03.12.2013, 04.12, 2013 and 05.12.2013 and seek bail.2. learned public prosecutor has opposed the ..... the office of another political party, damaged the building, furniture etc. and burst country bomb. the 13th accused is involved in crime no. 656 of 2012 for the offence under sec.153a of the penal code. b.a no. 929 of 2014 2 3. learned counsel has requested for bail.4. since these petitioners are in custody from 03.12.2013 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2014 (HC)

K.P. Sasidharan Achary Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... february 2014 order petitioner is accused in crime no.16 of 2014 of the kadackal police station for the offences punishable under sec.4 of the explosive act and sec.9(b)(1)(b) of the explosive substance act for alleged possession of 100 kg of ammonium nitrate, apprehends arrest and has filed the application.2. learned public prosecutor ..... from the quarry is ammonium nitrate which is different. according to the learned public prosecutor, ammonium nitrate can be used only for agricultural purposes and not as explosive as per the ammonium nitrate rules.5. it appears that the petitioner has obtained some licences to run the quarry and possess nitrate mixture. that, ammonium ..... quarry being operated by the petitioner, on 03.01.2014 at the relevant time along with 23 tubes containing gum, threads etc. meant to be used as explosive were also recovered.3. learned counsel submits that it is true that the quarry wherefrom ammonium nitrate was (allegedly) seized belong to the petitioner. according to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2014 (HC)

Sheriff A.H Vs. the Assistant Engineer

Court : Kerala

..... in between. the second petitioner has got all the requisite licences from the concerned authority, including the local authority, geology department, pollution control board and the authorities concerned under the explosives act. however, the operation being pursued by the petitioners came to be intercepted as per ext.p10 notice issued by the first respondent. though the petitioners tried to explain the position ..... .p.n.santhosh smt.k.p.geetha mani sri.p.n.appukuttan smt.aswathi appukuttan respondent(s): ---------------------------- 1. the assistant engineer, office of the assistant engineer, p.v.i.p section, no.3/6, irrigation department, perumbavoor, ernakulam dist pin683542. * addl.r2 & 3 impleaded2 state of kerala, represented by the secretary to government, industries department, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram-695001.3. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2014 (HC)

Mustaffa Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... order petitioners are accused nos.6 to 8 in crime no.743 of 2013 of the kolavallur police station. the offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable under sections 3 & 5 of the explosive substances act. this court vide order dated 07.11.2013 granted bail to all the petitioners subject to conditions. condition nos.3 & 5 reads as follows :3. it is ..... to a1 and a2 to make country bombs. consequently, a5 to a8 were also arrayed as accused and further report was filed adding secs.4 and 6 of the explosive substances act.5. the learned public prosecutor submits that the applicants are arraigned as a5 to a8 on the basis of the facts revealed from the investigation after the arrest of a1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2014 (HC)

N.V.Joshy Vs. the District Collector, Ernakulam

Court : Kerala

..... in the concerned building belonging to the fifth respondent and that the said respondent does not have any licence under the relevant provisions of law, particularly the explosives act and such other enactments.4. the version of the petitioner is sought to be resisted by the learned counsel for the fifth respondent pointing out that the ..... ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to immediately stop stocking and selling of any explosives or conducting fire work shop in the shop rooms bearing no.24/834 & 835 of ward no.24 of angamaly kizhakke angadi bhagom of angamaly municipality; iii. ..... appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take immediate action to stop the functioning of the fire work shop and stocking and selling explosive items without licence by the 5th respondent in the shop rooms bearing no.24/834 & 835 of ward no.24 of angamaly kizhakke angadi bhagom of angamaly municipality .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2014 (HC)

Faseela Vs. the Chief Town Planner

Court : Kerala

..... of the explosive license issued by the joint controller of explosives, chennai, along with the plan approved by him. ext.p9: a true copy of the noc dated279/2013 issued by the divisional officer, fire and rescue ..... the panchayath. ext.p5: a true copy of the certificate of registration obtained by the petitioner under kvatact. ext.p6: a true copy of the certificate of registration under cst act ext.p7: a true copy of the receipt dated318/2013 issued by the athavanad panchayath for the application of the petitioner for numbering the building. ext.p8: a true copy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 2014 (HC)

Abdul Latheef Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... are accused in crime no.1638 of 2013 of the pathanamthitta police station for the offences punishable under secs.143, 147, 148, 294(b), 427, 452 and sec.3(a) of the explosive substance act, apprehend arrest and have filed the application.2. learned public prosecutor has opposed the application. it is submitted that on the relevant date and time, petitioners committed mischiefs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2014 (HC)

Naranamoozhi Grama Panchayat Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... /62/m3/2010 dtd. 29/01/2010 and renewal order dtd. 15/03/2011 bearing no.844/2010- 11/2059/m3/2011. ext.r7.(4): licence under explosives act and rules bearing no.e/sc/kl/22/795 (e36869. ext.r7.(5): heavy earth moving machineries license from the director general of mine safety (southern zone) ..... report filed before the district collector, sought to have ext. p2 gsi report to be implemented forthwith. in spite of the enabling provision under the disaster management act, particularly section 30 (2) (3), no positive and effective steps have been taken so far and hence the challenge. the learned counsel appearing for the 6th respondent in w ..... virtue of the unauthorized activities pursued by the sixth respondent, the second respondent is bound to invoke the power and procedure prescribed under section 21(4) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and to seize the vehicles concerned. the callous inaction on the part of the second respondent in dealing with the issue .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //