Court : Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on : Feb-16-1989
Reported in : AIR1989J& K75
..... challenged it is said that he is appointed by virtue of sro 275 dated 7th may, 1987 for purposes of clauses (2) and (3) of section 284 of the municipal act. it is sought to be conveyed that respondent no. 1 can function only for collection of tax and its expenditure.77. reasons for his appointment is ..... of tangmarg/gulmarg. the appointment of respondent no. 2 is restricted to the functions which are to be discharged by him under subsections 2 and 3 of section 284 of the municipal act. the respondent no. 2 has therefore no authority to interfere with the petitioners building or prevent him from raising the construction, (d) respondent no. 2 ..... -2-1977 came into being. the then minister housing and urban development department had constituted a committee in exercise of powers vested in him under section 10 of the town planning act of 1963. this committee was to be headed by chief engineer gulmarg project organisation. chief executive officer gulmarg project organisation was one of the six .....
Tag this Judgment!