Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Year: 2006 Page 28 of about 411 results (0.076 seconds)

Bowrings Fine Art Auctioneers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Archaeological Survey of I ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ832

..... be exported by virtue of the sundry provisions of the antiquities and art treasures act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as `the antiquities act').2. section 3 of the antiquities act prohibits the export of `antiquities', which include paintings, as per the definitions in section 2 of the act. section 4 makes the customs act, 1962, applicable to instances where antiquities are sought to be exported. the said statute ..... when the new report is passed, the earlier report will not be given effect to. the cbi and customs authorities are indubitably acting on the basis of the `earlier' report.11. a perusal of section 24 of the antiquities act makes it palpably clear that it is either the director general or any officer not below the rank of director, archaeological survey of .....

Asian Hotels Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)101ITD247(Delhi)

..... such as not to be considered to be current repairs, viz., accumulated repairs etc., the assessee may claim deduction thereof under the provisions of general section 37(1) of the act. however, under no circumstances an expenditure of capital nature incurred by the owner on the building premises used by him for the purpose of business can ..... direction seems to be clear, namely, that the expenditure was capital in nature and, therefore, in any event, would not have been entitled to deduction under section 37 of the act. question no. 3, therefore, is also answered in the affirmative and in favour of the revenue.32. from the various judgments cited in the foregoing paragraphs, ..... such replacement cannot be regarded as current repairs. the replacement may amount to renovation or repairs which may or may not be entitled to deduction under section 37 of the act but such an expense has been rightly held by the tribunal as not being allowable as deduction under the said head 'current repairs'.as to the .....

Jas Rath Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 130(2006)DLT700

..... surrounding areas have already been developed and this fact is sufficiently established by the documentary evidence on record of this file. notifications issued under section 4 of the act for acquiring the land in question was for a purpose 'planned development of delhi'. the exact public purpose as stated was for widening ..... the claimants were also entitled to interest as per the prescribed rates. the claimants were still dis-satisfied and they filed regular first appeals under section 54 of the act. these regular first appeals were partly allowed vide judgment dated 4th september, 2001. all the appeals were disposed of and compensation was enhanced to ..... and additional amount, interest etc in accordance with law. being aggrieved from the award of the collector, the land owners preferred reference petition under section 18 of the act. these reference petitions were disposed of by the learned reference court, which enhanced the compensation and awarded the compensation at the flat rate of rs .....

Shri Madhusudan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(89)DRJ590

..... sought to be acquired. we may also keep in view the further salient fact that all the appellants have filed references for additional compensation under section 18 of the act. shri shanti bhushan, learned senior counsel, was right when he contended that the appellants could not have taken the risk of getting their reference ..... satisfaction depending upon any relevant date available to the state authorities at the time when they issued the impugned notification under section 4(1) of the act and dispensed with section 5-a inquiry by resorting to section 17 sub-section (4) thereof. the first point is, thereforee, answered in the negative, in favor of the appellants and against ..... could pass an order directing that in the emergent process of acquisition of land it will be necessary to dispense with the procedure provided under section 5a of the act. such direction essentially must be based upon proper application of mind. it was a commonly admitted position before us that there could be cases .....

Nandu and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(89)DRJ314

..... certainly the respondents would be entitled to exclude the period during which the proceedings were stayed by this court as contemplated under proviso to section 6(1) of the act. the remaining period out of the period of one year prescribed under law would be available to respondents for issuance of such notification/declaration ..... depending upon any relevant date available to the state authorities at the time when they issued the impugned notification under section 4(1) of the act and dispensed with section 5-a inquiry by resorting to section 17 sub-section (4) thereof. the first point is, thereforee, answered in the negative, in favor of the appellants and ..... desire from proceeding with the acquisition proceedings after issuance of the notification in january 1988 and hearing the objections of the petitioners as required under section 5a of the act. these are the decisions to be made by the respondents. the court is of the view that the entire acquisition proceedings are not vitiated .....

Hbhl-vks (J.V.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(2)ARBLR331(Delhi); 2006(90)DRJ181

..... days from receipt of the request by one party, the chief justice can be moved for appointing an arbitrator either under sub-section (5) or sub-section (6) of section 11 of the act.sub-section (5) of section 11 can be invoked by a party who has requested the other party to appoint an arbitrator and the latter fails to make ..... payment of the amount and settling the dispute. it is pertinent to note that the appellant did not file an application even after the 1st respondent invoked section 9 of the act and filed a petition seeking interim relief. under such circumstances, it cannot be said that there was a failure of the procedure prescribed under the contract. ..... :the above decision has no application to the facts of this case as in the present case, the arbitrator was already appointed before the appellant invoked section 11 of the act. the counsel for the appellant contended that the arbitrator was appointed after a long lapse of time and that too without any previous consultation with the .....

Hari Gokal Jewellers Vs. Satish Kapur

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ837

..... public policy.8. it may be noticed that the objection as to place of sue has to be taken at the first instance in terms of section 21 of the code. in terms of section 20 of the code, the suit shall be instituted in a court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction cause of action wholly or in part ..... suit by an agent against the principal for accounts. negativing the contention that only a principal can sue the agent for rendering proper accounts and not vice versa (as section 213 of the contract act provided that an agent is bound to render proper accounts to his principal on demand without a corresponding provision in the contract ..... supplies corpn. air 1988 mad 9.the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that the learned trial court has exceeded its jurisdiction and in fact has acted in violation of provisions of order 8 is certainly without any merit. the rules and procedure are primarily intended to achieve the twine object underlining the code of civil .....

Raj Kumar Chawla Vs. Lucas Indian Services

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi266; 129(2006)DLT755; 2006(89)DRJ560

..... in the cases of first category and normally should decline in the cases of the later category.7. the term 'admission' in section 70 of the evidence act relates only to admission of a party in the course of the trial of the suit and not to the attestation of a document ..... basement since 12-9-90 and in respect of ground floor since 29-11-85; that the lease deeds dated 12-5-94 were never acted upon and were sham documents; two tenancies existed in respect of the ground floor and two tenancies existed in respect of the basement and plaintiff ..... by the party executing it. the essential feature of admission is that it should be 'concise and deliberate act'. it must not be something which was not intended and was not the intention of the party. pre-requisite to admission are unconditional, unambiguous and ..... swatanter kumar, j. 1. the present appeal under section 96 r/w order 41 rule 2 of the code of civil procedure 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the 'code') is .....

Filmistan Exhibitors Ltd. Vs. N.C.T., Thr. Secy. Labour and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 131(2006)DLT648; [2006(111)FLR661]; (2007)ILLJ50Del; 2007(2)SLJ258(Delhi)

..... the award it does not appear that the workman adduced any evidence whatsoever in support of his contention that he complied with the requirements of section 25-b of the industrial disputes act. apart from examining himself in support of his contention he did not produce or call for any document from the office of the appellant herein ..... this court observed : (siri niwas case, scc p. 199, para 19)19. furthermore a party in order to get benefit of the provisions contained in section 114iii(g) of the evidence act must place some evidence in support of his case. here the respondent failed to do so.26. in hariram this court observed : (scc p. 250, para ..... to this application as well.as the petitioner failed to comply with the demand made by the respondent no. 2, the respondent filed an application under section 7 of the payment of gratuity act, 1972 before the controlling authority on 23rd march, 2001. the material averments in this application were to the following effect:xxxx2. basis of claim .....

Shri Kamlakant Mishra Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... after illegal possession. the only person who could have thrown any light on the presence of confiscated bearing was the driver, who is not traceable.5.2 section 115(2) of customs act, 1962, which deals with confiscation of the conveyance reads as under: (2) any conveyance or animal used as a means of transport in the smuggling ..... not have knowledge of the presence of the bearings having foreign markings, the confiscation of the truck under section 115(2) of the customs act, 1962, is correct.6. as regards the penalty on the appellant under section 112(b) of the customs act, 1962, the appellant has purchased the truck to earn livelihood, by transporting the goods for a charge ..... not have had any knowledge of the illicit goods being transported in truck.7. in view of the above findings, the confiscation of the truck under section 115(2) of the customs act is upheld and penalty on the appellant under section 112(b) of customs act is set aside. the appeal is allowed partly in the above terms.