Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Year: 2006 Page 20 of about 411 results (0.102 seconds)

Jul 19 2006 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Ispat Alloys Ltd. (Balasore

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-19-2006

..... were fabricated, were distinct marketable commodities, the existence of which was brought about by the process of manufacture as defined istate.,in section 2(f) of the act. these were not simply members, such as, angles etc. with holes or cut to a different size, but the process was undertaken to bring ..... was to be viewed in the background of the exemption notification issued in respect of goods manufactured otherwise than in a "factory" as defined in section 2(m) of the factories act and the tariff item 68 of the first schedule which was omitted. it was held in paragraph 12 that, all the parts of structures which ..... 73.08 of the excise tariff. (ii) the structures or parts thereof mentioned in the parenthesis of heading 73.08 illustrating parts of structures namely, bridges and bridges-sections, lock-gates, towers, lattice masts, roofs, roofing frameworks, doors and windows and their frames and thresholds for doors, shutters, balustrades, pillars and columns as well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2006 (TRI)

New Kailash Jewellary House, M.D. Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-18-2006

Reported in : (2006)(110)ECC693

..... firms and that the licences are non est since inception in such a situation. it was, therefore, held that the imports were unauthorized and liable for confiscation under section 111 of the customs act, 1962. for the appellant - m/s m.d.overseas, the commissioner held that it had colluded in the fraud and was liable to pay duty as demanded ..... impugned order. it was, inter-alia, held that the subject goods valued at rs. 11.30 crores imported against 46 gold rep licences were liable for confiscation under section 111(o) of the act. the demand of rs. 54,25,844/-was confirmed against the appellant - m/s new kailash jewellary house and the amount of rs. 11,91,520/- ..... he examined the entries of the books of accounts to find out whether the transactions were reflected in a genuine way. in the statements which were recorded under section 108 of the customs act, there is reference to payment having been made on gold, for example, in the statement of mr. neeraj kapoor, partner of m/s k.k. exports. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2006 (HC)

Shri Kartar Singh and ors. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-18-2006

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4099; 131(2006)DLT643; II(2006)DMC382; 2006(90)DRJ734

..... , and in order to the doing of that thing; orthirdly. intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.8. in hira lal jain (supra), a learned single judge of this court, after examining the provisions of section 107, indicated that a reading thereof would make it clear that the person who instigates another ..... to the doing of that thing; or thirdly, intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9. in mahendra singh v. state of m.p. : 1996crilj894 , the appellant was charged for an offence under section 306 i.p.c. basically based upon the dying declaration of the deceased, ..... which defines 'abetment'. he submitted that the ingredients of section 107 are not made out in the present case as there is no instigation or goading. secondly, there is no allegation of any conspiracy and, thirdly, there is no intentional aiding in the doing of an illegal act. he also submitted that there is no suicide note in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2006 (HC)

Morgan Securities and Credits Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Morepen Laboratories Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR159(Delhi); 132(2006)DLT588; 2006(91)DRJ618

..... the ambit of the action contemplated.15. at this juncture, it would be relevant to note some provisions of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. section 5 of this act limits the extent of judicial intervention and provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, in matters ..... an action is pending adjudication before the court that the court can, if the said conditions precedent are satisfied, reopen the transaction while acting under section 3 of the usurious loans act, 1918. when a decree is passed in such an action, the rights of the parties stand conclusively determined. the stage of adjudicating ..... consent decree and a decree on merits will be considered hereinbelow.16. the next provision of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 which is of significance is section 34 thereof. sub-section (1) of section 34 specifically provides that recourse to courts against an arbitral award may be made only by an application for setting aside .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2006 (HC)

Ge Countrywide Consumer Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Shri Prabhakar Kis ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-2006

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR353(Delhi)

..... the public in the administration of justice.55. thus, we are clearly of the opinion that the contemners are guilty of criminal contempt as defined under section 2(c) of the act.67. before parting with this case, we may add:judiciary is the bed rock and handmaid of orderly life and civilised society. if the people ..... does not have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present petition.26. the petitioner has also concealed the fact of having filed a petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 at mumbai. this certainly amounts to concealment of a material fact in the circumstances noticed above. the entire conduct of the petitioner in ..... of this court at delhi, the petitioner had filed an arbitration petition no. 529/2004 before the high court of judicature at bombay under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 in respect of the disputes and differences which are the subject matter of the present case. in this petition also reliance was placed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2006 (HC)

Ashok Bhattacharya Vs. State Through Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-2006

Reported in : 2007CriLJ214; 131(2006)DLT581; 2006(90)DRJ299; 2007(3)SLJ475(Delhi)

..... and vest in the central government from the appointed day. the appointed day being 21.1.1984. similar is the purport of the provisions of section 5.4. section 12(1) of the said act also clearly indicates that every person who has been, immediately before the appointed day, i.e. before 28.1.1984, employed by the company ..... the said units. he was admittedly, employed at calcutta which is not specified in section 2(e) of the said act. thereforee, it cannot be construed that he became an employee of the central government. the impugned order is clearly erroneous. the petitioner cannot be considered ..... only those employees of ganesh flour mills co. ltd. who were employed in connection with the specified units collectively known as ganesh flour mills described in section 2(e) of the said act who became employees of the central government. the present petitioner was employed by ganesh flour mills co. ltd. but not in connection with any of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2006 (HC)

O.S. Pasricha and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-2006

Reported in : 2007CriLJ861

..... induced fraudulently or dishonestly to deliver any property to any person. the second class of acts set forth in the section is the doing or omitting to do anything which the person deceived would not do or omit to do if he ..... have lodged counter claims and, thereforee, the complaint even prima facie does not disclose any offence allegedly committed by the petitioners under section 420 ipc. the summoning orders as well as the impugned order dated 3.4.2003 are hereby quashed and the complaint of the ..... 4 scc 168, the supreme court held as under:14. on a reading of the section it is manifest that in the definition there are set forth two separate classes of acts which the person deceived may be induced to do. in the first place he may be ..... were not so deceived. in the first class of cases the inducing must be fraudulent or dishonest. in the second class of acts, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2006 (TRI)

Acit Vs. Shri O.P. Chawla

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-14-2006

..... eastern newspaper society v. cit 119 itr 996, and s.narayanappa v. cit 63 itr 219 which were all decided with reference to either section 34 of the 1922 act or section 147 of the new act as it stood before the amendment, in order to hold that the meaning of the expression "reason to believe" continues to be the same ..... 256 itr 1 (del.) (fb), cit v. foramer framer and jindal photo films ltd. v. dcit , referred at bar, the assessments were completed under section 143 (3) of the act after examination of the issue and verification of relevant material and documents on record. thus there was an application of mind and opinion was formed for accepting the ..... by the assessing officer then question of change of opinion would not arise. i, therefore, hold that processing of return of income so done under section 143 (1) of the act purportedly without application of mind would itself confer jurisdiction upon the assessing officer to reopen the proceedings.7. it is to be noted that substantial changes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2006 (TRI)

Silicon Graphics Systems India Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-14-2006

Reported in : (2006)103TTJ(Delhi)220

..... had considered this plea of the assessee. in this regard our attention was invited to the assessment order for asst. yr. 1996-97 passed under section 250 and section 143(3) of the it act dt. 24th nov., 2000, available at pp. 138 to 140 of the paper book.4.14 we have carefully considered the entire material on ..... nature of the activity necessarily involved some other result. it was held that it is not in the nature of entertainment expenditure within the meaning of section 37(2b) of the it act.4.27 the hon'ble kerala high court in the case of cit v. aluminium industries ltd. (supra), has also justified such expenditure as business ..... entertainment expenditure. in this regard he has also submitted a written argument, a portion of which is as under: under the specific provision of explanation to section 37(2) of the act as applicable for the subject assessment year (reference p. 10 of supplementary paper book no. iii) entertainment expenditure does not include expenditure on food or beverages .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2006 (HC)

P.C. Khanna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-13-2006

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ684

..... above narration of factual matrix of the case it is clear that the land stands acquired vide notification dated 10.5.06 issued under section 4 of the act. the provisions of section 31(3) of the act do not give any indefeasible legal right to any person to claim land in lieu of compensation payable for acquisition of his land. ..... lease hold, a tenant or permissive use for a specified purpose. these are merely illustrative examples and the expression cannot be explained exhaustively in a judgment. section 31(4) of the act vests vide powers in the collector to enter into any arrangement with any person interested in the land and competent to contract. wider the power vested, greater ..... to the acquisition of his land. on this premise the petitioner submits that petitioner has a legal right for allotment of land for land in terms of. section 31(3) of the act, particularly when the respondents have already entered into an exchange deed, land for land, in favour of m/s jindal pipes ltd. and had even .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //