Court : Delhi
..... s finding to the contrary is plainly erroneous. section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act 117. to begin with, the court wishes to draw a distinction between section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act. while section 3(2)(iii) deals with the offence of committing mischief by fire or any explosive substance with both the intention and knowledge that ..... to a member of a scheduled caste, section 3(2)(iv) adds a ..... such act would cause damage to any property belonging .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... s finding to the contrary is plainly erroneous. section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act 117. to begin with, the court wishes to draw a distinction between section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act. while section 3(2)(iii) deals with the offence of committing mischief by fire or any explosive substance with both the intention and knowledge that ..... to a member of a scheduled caste, section 3(2)(iv) adds a ..... such act would cause damage to any property belonging .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... s finding to the contrary is plainly erroneous. section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act 117. to begin with, the court wishes to draw a distinction between section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act. while section 3(2)(iii) deals with the offence of committing mischief by fire or any explosive substance with both the intention and knowledge that ..... to a member of a scheduled caste, section 3(2)(iv) adds a ..... such act would cause damage to any property belonging .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... s finding to the contrary is plainly erroneous. section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act 117. to begin with, the court wishes to draw a distinction between section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act. while section 3(2)(iii) deals with the offence of committing mischief by fire or any explosive substance with both the intention and knowledge that ..... to a member of a scheduled caste, section 3(2)(iv) adds a ..... such act would cause damage to any property belonging .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... s finding to the contrary is plainly erroneous. section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act 117. to begin with, the court wishes to draw a distinction between section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act. while section 3(2)(iii) deals with the offence of committing mischief by fire or any explosive substance with both the intention and knowledge that ..... to a member of a scheduled caste, section 3(2)(iv) adds a ..... such act would cause damage to any property belonging .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... s finding to the contrary is plainly erroneous. section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act 117. to begin with, the court wishes to draw a distinction between section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act. while section 3(2)(iii) deals with the offence of committing mischief by fire or any explosive substance with both the intention and knowledge that ..... to a member of a scheduled caste, section 3(2)(iv) adds a ..... such act would cause damage to any property belonging .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... s finding to the contrary is plainly erroneous. section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act 117. to begin with, the court wishes to draw a distinction between section 3(2)(iii) and (iv) poa act. while section 3(2)(iii) deals with the offence of committing mischief by fire or any explosive substance with both the intention and knowledge that ..... to a member of a scheduled caste, section 3(2)(iv) adds a ..... such act would cause damage to any property belonging .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... : reported at 1994 supp judgment judgment reported the 36. associated builders v. dda, (2015) 3 scc49 may justifiably be christened as the high watermark in the law relating to section 34 of the act, and any attempt to paraphrase the decision is fraught with the risk of mutilation. the decision is, almost entirely, definitively authoritative, and brooks no ambiguity or anomaly. nonetheless ..... ) or contamination by radioactivity from any nuclear fuel, or from any nuclear waste from the combustion of nuclear fuel, radioactive other toxic or hazardous properties of any explosive nuclear assembly or nuclear components thereof; explosive (iv) pressure waves caused by aircraft or other aerial devices travelling at sonic or supersonic speeds; (v) riot, commotion or disorder, unless solely restricted to the employees .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the petitioner fasih mahmood seeks regular bail under section 439 cr.p.c. in case fir no.54/2011 registered under sections 471/489b/489c/120b ipc; sections 16/18/unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967, (in short uapa ); section 25 arms act and sections 3,4,5 explosive substances act at ps special cell, lodhi colony. status ..... report is on record.2. i have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file.... petitioner s counsel urged that the petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2012. at present, he is facing trial only for commission of offence punishable under section ..... serious allegations against him allegedly being member of an unlawful organization i.e. indian majahideen in india charged for commission of offences punishable under section 20 of the uapa.9. 10. of the case. the bail application is dismissed. observation in the order shall have no impact on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... have been avoided if the affected party had taken reasonable care of complied with prudent utility practices: its obligations under a) act of god, including, but not limited to lightning, drought, fire and explosion (to the extent originating from a source external to the site), earthquake, volcanic eruption, landslide, flood, cyclone, typhoon or ..... date ought to be granted on the ground of what is claimed to be a force majeure event. the expression force majeure has been defined under section 11.3.1 of the agreement, which reads as under:-" 11.3.1. a force majeure means any event or circumstances or combination of ..... vibhu bakhru % order0803.2018 vibhu bakhru, j1 the petitioner (parampujya solar energy private limited hereafter psepl ) has filed the present petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter the act ), inter alia, praying as under:-" a. grant injunction restraining the respondent no.2, its servants, agents, representatives and any other person .....
Tag this Judgment!