Array ( [0] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [1] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [2] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [3] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [4] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [5] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [6] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [7] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [8] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [9] => ..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate ..... [10] => ..... 58 the word lease , as inclusively defined in section 2(16)(c) of the stamp act, 1899, was construed as covering a transaction, for the purposes of the stamp act, which may not, otherwise, amount to lease , as defined in section 105 of the transfer of property act, 1882. in state of bombay v. hospital ..... or unwelcome , would necessarily involve an element of psychoanalysis of the purported victim.66. free consent, or welcome , can constitute a defence, however, only where the act itself is not proscribed by the law. generally speaking, sexual intercourse, between adults, is legally permissible. where, therefore, it is alleged that such intercourse amounts to ..... to the social, political or economic needs of our developing nation fostering secular values, breaking the barriers of casteism, linguism, religious bigotry and should act as an instrument of social change. education kindles its flames for pursuit of excellence, enables and ennobles the young mind to sharpen his or her intellect ..... [11] => ..... was given under section 16, thus rendering payment under those lcs by the foreign bank proper. as regards lc151 the only lc as regards which stc/millennium claim to have rejected the documents, two ..... later than the close of the fifth banking day following the day of presentation.22. thus, in case the payment under the lc is to be injuncted, a notice under section 16 is mandatory, within the terms of that article. in this case, as regards lcs 150, 154 and 159, the documents were accepted by allahabad bank, and no notice ..... g.s.sistani hon'ble ms. justice sangita dhingra sehgal g.s.sistani, j.1. this is an appeal under section 96 read with order xli of the code of civil procedure, 1908 read with section 10 of the delhi high court act, 1966 filed by the appellant impugning the judgment dated 20.01.2017 by which a single judge of this court ..... [12] => ..... kumar mishra, advocates. ..... respondent coram: hon'ble ms. justice jyoti singh jyoti singh, j.1. the present petition has been filed under section 9 of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 ( act ) seeking a direction to the respondent to pay/deposit an amount of rs. 3,37,73,19,434.10/- which constitutes 90% of the ..... the plaintiff's chances of establishing his right, there cannot be any rational basis for withholding the injunction." 49. in exercise of powers under section 9 of the act, several benches of this court have passed mandatory interlocutory directions directing payments to be made to the petitioners. relevant portions are as under: a. ..... certain the contract of construction was awarded to some other person. the petitioner invoked the arbitration clause. he also sought interim relief under section 41 of the old act restraining the respondent from dispossessing the petitioner from the work site and from directly and indirectly interfering with the awarded work. this relief ..... [13] => ..... the arbitration clause was not incorporated by reference in the contract between the respondent and the appellant.88. the supreme court, on an interpretation of section 7(5) of the act of 1996, has summarized its scope and intent in the following manner:-" 24 (i) an arbitration clause in another document, would get incorporated into ..... letter dated december 06, 2000 seeking reference to the disputes to the arbitration. as the respondent failed to comply, the appellant filed an application under section 11 of the act. according to the appellant, clause 67.3 of the general conditions of the contract forming part of the contract between the public works department and the ..... benefit of deferment granted earlier. the ca continues to govern the parties and is binding.50. once, the dispute in question is not arbitrable, a petition section 9 of the act of 1996 is not maintainable.51. mr. sethi also submitted, with the application dated march 25, 2014 petitioner in order to assess the claim (amount ..... [14] => ..... as a deadly weapon. the court found that such a knife was not capable of producing death or serious bodily injury and therefore, set aside the conviction under section 398 of the ipc. in sukhvinder singh v. state (supra), this court had referred to various earlier decisions wherein the issue whether a knife could be ..... and afterwards. and thus, the prosecution had successfully established its case against the accused. consequently, the accused (appellant herein) was found guilty of the offences under sections 392/397/4of the ipc and was sentenced accordingly. the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has assailed the 7. impugned judgment on the ground that the trial ..... out of a judgement dated 31.05.2017 passed by the learned asj, (north-east), karkardooma courts, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offences under sections 397/392/4of the indian penal code, 1860 (hereafter ipc ). by an order dated 08.06.2017, the appellant has been sentenced to seven years of rigorous ..... [15] => ..... to the petitioner, requiring the petitioner to show cause as to why (i) the assessable value of the aforesaid imported goods, as declared, be not rejected under section 14 of the customs act, read with rule 12 of the customs valuation (determination of price of imported goods) rules, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the customs valuation rules ), and be ..... not re-determined as 21,57,64,703/-, under section 14 of the customs act read with rules 3 and 9 of the customs valuation rules, (ii) differential customs duty of 79,21,701/-, evaded/short paid in respect of the goods ..... imported under the bills of entry covered by the show cause notice, be not demanded and recovered from the petitioner under section 28 of the customs act, along with interest, w.p.(c) 6495/2019 page 4 of 14 7. (iii) the amount of 26 lakhs, paid during investigation, be not appropriated ..... [16] => ..... board. for ready reference, paras 71 to 73 of the judgment of the supreme court may be reproduced thus: 71. it is useful to refer section 12 of the act which deals with the powers of central government to enforce recommendations of the wage board. it reads as under: 12. powers of central government recommendations ..... parties don't want to add anymore. the matter is concluded. 23. the competent authority adjudicated the aforesaid application, of the union, preferred under section 17(1) of the working journalists act, vide orders dated 21st july, 2015 and 19th august, 2015 , which form the subject matter of challenge in these writ petitions. apropos the ..... to each workman, on whose behalf the application was preferred, was annexed thereto, and it was, accordingly, prayed that proceedings be initiated, under section 17(1) of the working journalists act, against the petitioner and that, in the event of refusal or default, by the petitioner, to disburse wages in terms of the majithia wage ..... [17] => ..... board. for ready reference, paras 71 to 73 of the judgment of the supreme court may be reproduced thus: 71. it is useful to refer section 12 of the act which deals with the powers of central government to enforce recommendations of the wage board. it reads as under: 12. powers of central government recommendations ..... parties don't want to add anymore. the matter is concluded. 23. the competent authority adjudicated the aforesaid application, of the union, preferred under section 17(1) of the working journalists act, vide orders dated 21st july, 2015 and 19th august, 2015 , which form the subject matter of challenge in these writ petitions. apropos the ..... to each workman, on whose behalf the application was preferred, was annexed thereto, and it was, accordingly, prayed that proceedings be initiated, under section 17(1) of the working journalists act, against the petitioner and that, in the event of refusal or default, by the petitioner, to disburse wages in terms of the majithia wage ..... [18] => ..... bank drafts, would certainly come within the sweep of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence. that would come within the meaning of section 3 and punishable under section 4 of the act.41. section 3 of the pmla defines the offence of money laundering as, "whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly ..... the commission of scheduled offence and is continuing to be committed even now. fir registered by the cbi (predicate offence), inter-alia, is also under section 8 of the pc act, which had always been scheduled offence i.e. even prior to 01.06.2009. the actions of money laundering as a matter of fact have ..... learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record and the material in sealed cover as well.33. the endeavour under the amendment act, 2013, vis-a-vis sections 5 & 8 is to enable attachment proceedings against the persons who are accused of a scheduled offence; persons who have been accused of money laundering ..... [19] => ..... coram: hon'ble mr. justice v. kameswar rao v. kameswar rao, j.(oral) 1. these petitions have been filed by the petitioners under section 9 and section 34 of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996. section 9 petitions being o.m.p.(i) 7/2019, o.m.p.(i) 8/2019 and o.m.p.(i) 9/2019. the common prayers ..... compensation and had accordingly made a claim before the arbitrator, based in saharanpur being dm saharanpur appointed by the central government under sub-section 5 of section 3(g) of the act of 1956. as stated above, the arbitrator dismissed the claims made by the petitioners herein.5. the plea of the learned counsel for the ..... widening of the national highway no.73; the acquiring body being the national highway authority of india, dehradun. after the acquisition, the competent authority under section 3(g) of the act of 1956 determined the amount payable as compensation to the petitioners / landowners. it appears that the petitioners were not satisfied with the amount paid as ..... ) Explosives Act 1884 Section 4 Definitions - Sortby Recent - Court Delhi - Page 4 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Page 4 of about 19,101 results (0.096 seconds)

Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Brahm Singh vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Shiv Charan & Ors. Vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Shambir & Ors vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Ram Bali vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Jokhu vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Uday Pal Singh vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Ram Nath vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Ram Naresh & Ors vs.state (Delhi Admn.)

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Sheetal Prasad & Ors vs.state of Delhi.

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 28 2018 (HC)

Ajudhia Parsad & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... officials forcing the crl.a1521996 & connected page 12 of 79 mob to flee away to block no.13, the police officials having made seizures of fire-arms, ammunition, explosive material etc. and taking certain persons (mostly sikhs) into custody.13. the third case fir no.425/1984 was registered at the instance of the acp of the ..... or to register the cases and consequently he (the sho), motorcycle rider (munshi ram) and si jugti ram having committed offences punishable under sections 217 and 211 ipc and section 60 of delhi police act,1978.14. the last in the series of the aforementioned cases would be the fir no.426/1984, the rukka (ex. pw8/a-b ..... been made out for invocation of the rule of vicarious liability under section 149 ipc vis-a-vis the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substances to destroy the houses, shops or places of worship, punishable under section 436 ipc. though the statements of various witnesses under section 161 cr. pc which have been referred to earlier did indicate .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //