Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2003 Page 61 of about 717 results (0.336 seconds)

Feb 27 2003 (HC)

K. Krishna Reddy Vs. A.P. State Police Housing Corporation Ltd. and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-27-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT680

..... conclusion that mala fides can be attributed to the decision taken by the tender committee, consisting of group of experts, who are technically qualified and that the 3rd respondent had acted in a way to favour the 4th respondent. it is also equally not comprehendible as to how the relationship of being classmates between the 2nd and 3rd respondents can vitiate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (HC)

M. Jayarami Reddy and anr. Vs. Siddavaram Salamma and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD899; 2003(3)ALT114

..... collector may refer such dispute to the decision of the court. the first respondent herein has not taken any steps either to refer the matter under section 18 read with section 30 of the act or filed any suit for declaration of title of the land in question, but simply made an objection before the collector and the special deputy collector ..... that the first respondent has failed to prove her right, title and possession and therefore, there is no necessity to refer the issue to the civil court under section 30 of the act. the said order has not been questioned in any of the proceedings i.e., in any of the civil proceedings. without questioning the said order, the ..... , she raised a dispute with regard to the payment of the compensation after the award was passed and rightly she made an objection to refer the matterunder section 30 of the act and the claim of the first respondent was enquired pursuant to the directions of this court and the same was rejected by the second respondent, but the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (HC)

Kakinada China Apparao [Died] Per L.R. and Kakinada B. Gurunadha Rao V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Reported in : AIR2003AP454; 2003(5)ALT375

..... of banking regulation act. in the decision referred (2) supra, a division bench of this court held that there can be no presumption that the charging of compound interest is ..... fanciful manner.'12. in the decision referred (3) supra, this court while dealing with order 34 rule 11 cpc and section 21-a of the banking regulation act 1949 held that the present section 21-a of the banking regulation act does not over ride order 34 rule 11 cpc and the courts have discretion and power under order 34 rule 11 cpc ..... to fix the rate of interest from the date of suit till the date of realization notwithstanding the provisions in section 21-a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (HC)

Religious Endowments Department Vs. Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD707; 2003(4)ALT701

..... of the matter and had negatived the relief of the plaintiff. the learned counsel had drawn my attention to different provisions of the hyderabad municipal corporations act, 1955, inclusive of sections 199 and 202, and the learned counsel had placed strong reliance on a decision in official trustee, madras v. madras corporation, air (30) 1943 ..... evidence at all in this regard.10. per contra, t.s. venkata ramana, learned counsel representing the respondent-corporation had drawn my attention to section 685 of the act, and had submitted that the issuance of the notice under the said provision is mandatory and for want of notice, definitely the suit itself is ..... defendant. the trial court, on appreciation of the oral and documentary evidence, held that the demand itself is a mala fide action and no notice under section 685 of the act, 1955 is necessary, and ultimately, had decreed the suit. aggrieved by the same, the visakhapatnam municipal corporation (hereinafter in short referred to as 'the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hyderabad Race Club Charitable Trust

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Reported in : 2003(5)ALT125; (2003)183CTR(AP)454; [2003]262ITR194(AP)

..... property held under the trust that it can be treated as voluntary contribution given by the hyderabad race club to the assessee-trust as contemplated under section 12 of the act, the conduct of the hyderabad race club in respect of this transaction is only a fiduciary for the benefit of the assessee. such voluntary contributions ..... derived from such transactions cannot be called an income from the business. assuming that it is a business as contemplated under section 2(13) of the act, the same is exempted under section 11 of the act. further, the submission that the income shall be treated as an income derived from the property held under the trust cannot ..... receipts did not constitute income from the business.19. in this backdrop of submissions, we may have to examine the very word 'business' as contemplated under section 2(13) of the act. the word 'business' is one, of large and indefinite import. however, it connotes something which occupies the labour and attention of a person for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (HC)

G. Parimala Vs. Rajesh Bhatia

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT419

..... rightly accepted the xerox copy of the said document as secondary evidence. the learned counsel further contended that in view of the amendment brought out to section 115 of civil procedure code under act 46 of 1999, restricting the scope of interference, the order under revision does not warrant any interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction.10. i have ..... , it could not have the effect of disposal of the suit and therefore it cannot be interfered with in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of civil procedure code as amended by act 46 of 1999 which came into force with effect from 1-7-2002.14. for the aforesaid reasons, there is no merit in the ..... reason to interfere with the finding of fact recorded by the learned trial judge. it is well settled that this court while exercising revisional jurisdiction will not act as a court of appeal so as to reappreciate the evidence on record for recording independent findings on questions of fact.11. the learned counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (HC)

G. Jawaharlal Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Rural Electrificatio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD147; 2003(3)ALT594

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was initially appointed as Economic Analyst in the Rural Electrification Corporation Limited, New Delhi, 1st respondent (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation'), in the year 1978. Thereafter he was promoted as Assistant Director in the year 1981 and further promoted as Deputy Director in June, l986.2. In June 1996, a Director was appointed on contract basis for a period of two years. During that time, through orders dated 4-1-1996, he kept the petitioner in additional charge of administration and general services. This assignment involved supervision of general administration and personnel matters. The petitioner was also made member of the Purchasing Committee and number of purchases of various items had to be made; Furnishing materials, such as, sofa and curtain clothes were few such items.3. In 1996, the Audit report revealed shortage of certain materials. The petitioner was issued a Memo dated 23-9-1997 by the Deputy Chief (Personn...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (TRI)

N.S.V. Prasad Raju Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

..... of feed could be stored in the shed. as per policy condition no. 13 in case of dispute it should be referred to the arbitrator under the provisions of arbitration act, 1940. the complainant had not submitted any claim for rs. 13,60,933/-. hence there is no deficiency in service. 6. the complainant besides filing his affidavit also filed exs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (HC)

Cit Vs. Hyderabad Race Club Charitable Trust

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN788(AP)

..... receipts did not constitute income from the business.12. in this backdrop of submissions, we may have to examine the very word 'business' as contemplated under section 2(13) of the act. the word 'business' is one of large and indefinite import. however, it connotes something which occupies the labour and attention of a person for the ..... derived from such transactions cannot be called an income from the business. assuming that it is a business as contemplated under section 2(13) of the act, the same is exempted under section 11 of the act. further, the submission that the income shall be treated as an income derived from the property held under the trust cannot ..... the property held under the trust it can be treated as voluntary contribution given by the hyderabad race club to the assessee-trust as contemplated under section 12 of the act. the conduct of the hyderabad race club in respect of this transaction is only a fiduciary for the benefit of the assessee. such voluntary contributions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Tatipamula Laxminarayana and ors. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD(Cri)620; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)286; 2003CriLJ2747

..... and 1982 referred to above. the appellants are alleged to have contravened these control orders. section 7 of the act provides for punishment for contravention of the said control orders.8. the basis of allegation by the prosecution against the accused is that one constable from ..... and distribution) order 1982 (for short the 1982 order') read with conditions 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the license, punishable under sections 7 and 9 of the essential commodities act, 1955 (for short 'the act'). the trial court, through its judgment dated 12-9-1996, found guilty and convicted them of the said offences. for the contravention of ..... not call for any interference.7. the contraventions alleged against the accused are the one under the essential commodities act. the state government had issued various control orders in exercise of its power under section 3 of the act. two such orders, which have a bearing on the trade in rice, are the control orders of 1984 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //