Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-05-2003
Reported in : 2004(1)ALD754
..... value is between rs.50,000/- to rs.1,00,000/-if the value exceeds rs.1,00,000/-4.instrtution andendowments published under section 6la) of the act which are managed by theexecutive officers in the rank of oepul commissioners and regl. jointcommissioners and fall under the purview of the provision ..... value is between rs.50,000/- to rs.1,00,000/-if the valuee xceeds rs.1,00,000/-3.institution andendowmentspublished under section g(a} of the act other than the institutionsmanaged by the exective officers in the rank of deputy commissioner andregional joint commissioners and mutts whose annual income is ..... the annual rentals thereon shall be specified in the table below:tablesl. no.classification of theinstitution or endowmentassistant commissionerdeputycommissionerregl. jt.commissioneraddl.commissionercommissioner1.institution endowmentspublishedunder section 6(c] of the act & mutts whoso annual income is belowrs.50,000/-lease value not exceedingrs. 15,000/-if the value is between rs.15,000/- .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-03-2003
Reported in : 2003(2)ALD888; 2003(3)ALT205
..... from 160-140 and this court passed an order, restoring the intake. by his refusing to act upon it and deferring the further action till the 2nd respondent clarifies it, the 3rd respondent had virtually subordinated the order of this court to the instructions of ..... the 2nd respondent. the 3rd respondent, who was holding the position of convenor on behalf of all the universities, acted in an irresponsible, callous and indifferent manner. he tried to justify his acts and omissions by taking a plea that he was not a party to thewrit petition and that the admissions were closed long back ..... the purport of it and wanted further instructions or information from the 2nd respondent. in a way, he refused to act upon the orders of this court unless he heard from the 2nd respondent. this act of the 3rd respondent cannot be countenanced. he was very much aware that the intake of the petitioner-college was reduced .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-03-2003
Reported in : 2003(3)ALT324
..... that the impugned notice dated 23-9-2002 of the 2nd respondent for moving the 'no confidence motion is not in accordance with the provisions as required under section 46 (3) of the act. admittedly, the notice dated 23-9-2002 was served on the petitioner only on 24-9-2002 fixing the date of 'no confidence motion' on 8-10-2002 ..... -2002 of the 2nd respondent proposing to conduct a meeting of the municipal council, jangaon, warangal district on 8-10-2002 as against the provisions of the a.p. municipalities act, 1965, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to conduct the meeting of municipal council, jangaon scheduled to be held on 8-10-2002 or any other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-03-2003
Reported in : 2003(2)ALT661; (2003)IILLJ1149AP
..... information collected, tabulated and prepared by the said department. hence, the respondent cannot be called to be an industry within the meaning of section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act. the function of enumeration of census work is purely a sovereign function and the tribunal has rightly t relied upon the judgment of ..... tribunal-cum-labour court passed its award considering two important aspects:(i) that the census department was not an industry within the meaning of section 2(j) of industrial disputes act; and(ii) the dispute is raised after a delay of fourteen years.8. insofar as the first aspect is concerned, the labour court ..... 240 days. all of a sudden the regional joint director, census operations, khammam region prevented him from attending to duties violating the provisions of section 25f of the industrial disputes act and neither the petitioner was paid notice pay nor retrenchment compensation, though worked continuously for a period of 240 days. after termination of his .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-02-2003
Reported in : 2003(2)ALD577; 2003(4)ALT29
..... of certiorari or prohibition and for consequential reliefs. 3. the petitioner contends that unless and until the notification under clause (d) of sub-section (3) of section 1 of the act is issued in respect of watches, it was not competent for the first respondent to initiate any proceedings or prosecute the petitioner for the alleged ..... not come within the definition of packaged commodities and subsequently no notification as regards watches was issued as required under clause (d) of sub-section (3) of section 1 of the act. the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner was not accepted and ultimately the first respondent passed an order dated 4-2-1993, ..... .9. since there did not exist any notification particularly as on the date on which the inspection was made covering the watches issued under section 1(3)(d) of the act, the proceedings initiated against the petitioner by the first respondent are without jurisdiction and without any lawful authority. the same are accordingly quashed. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-02-2003
Reported in : 2003(4)ALT87; III(2003)BC289; [2003]115CompCas66(AP)
..... the apex court was pleased to hold that the said alteration is a material alteration. the above two judgments are not rendered interpreting the provision in section 87 of negotiable instruments act. except these two decisions, no other decision is relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant. as already pointed out, these two decisions do ..... earlier decisions of this court. this court in a decision reported in venkata subbayya v. viswanatham, 1971 (2) alt 244 interpreting the provision in section 87 of negotiable instruments act held that any alteration in a receipt is not an alteration made in a negotiable instrument and it is an alteration made in a document called receipt ..... . this court further held that the suit pro-note cannot be regarded as having been materially altered or even altered to attract the provisions of section 87 of the act simply because payment endorsement is found to be spurious, when no reliance was placed upon it by the plaintiff for saving the suit from the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-02-2003
Reported in : 2003(2)ALD93; 2003(6)ALT730
orderp.s. narayana, j. 1. the revision petitioner filed the civil revision petition under section 115 of the code of civil procedure questioning the order of the junior civil judge, prathipadu in e.a.s.r.no. 3014 of 2001 in e.p.no. 45 .....
Tag this Judgment!