Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2003 Page 36 of about 4,604 results (1.361 seconds)

NagIn Das M. Goradia Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)151

..... not be included in the block period.16. the manner of computation of undisclosed income of the block period has been prescribed under section 158bb of the act. according to sub-section (1) of this section, the undisclosed income of the block period shall be the aggregate of the total income of the previous years falling within the block ..... escaped income as a result of a search conducted before 1st july, 1995, are to be assessed only in the regular assessment, which includes reassessment under section 147 of the act.it thus follows that jurisdiction for a block assessment, notwithstanding a search, cannot lie, where there is no discovery in the strictest meaning of the ..... only the undisclosed income of the block period on the basis of the evidence found and material available as a result of the search conducted under section 132 of the act; and that the powers of regular assessment are kept intact and so are all the appellate, revisional and other powers affecting such regular assessment and .....

Siti Cable Network Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)82TTJ(Mum.)106

..... cable is already part of mms (material management system). the cost of these cables are, therefore, chargeable as repairs and allowable as revenue expenditure under section 31 or under section 37 of it act, 1961. therefore, the loss revenue loss incurred in the normal course of the business. the ao did not accept the submission of the assessee and ..... of goods for business, the destroying abandoning these goods is business decision and loss on that account is business loss or expenses deductible against income under section 37 of the act. take another case of cash loss by theft while cash is asset, is it the loss is not allowed as deduction? the vital point to ..... enforce the cable operators to declare correct number of subscription and, therefore, to pay the channels the correct amount of subscription. the ao issued notice under section 133(6) of it act, 1961, to some of the jv partners of the assessee and they also submitted that they did not have any control over cable operators. it was .....

Fcc Vs. Nextwave Personal Communications Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... s. c. 525(a) states: "protection against discriminatory treatment "(a) except as provided in the perishable agricultural commodities act, 1930, the packers and stockyards act, 1921, and section 1 of the act entitled 'an act making appropriations for the department of agriculture for the fiscal year ending june 30, 1944, and for other purposes,' approved ..... of 11 u. s. c. 525(a) reads as follows: "except as provided in the perishable agricultural commodities act, 1930, the packers and stockyards act, 1921, and section 1 of the act entitled 'an act making appropriations for the department of agriculture for the fiscal year ending june 30, 1944, and for other purposes,' approved ..... .... " 309(j)(4)(a). the fcc decided to award licenses for broadband personal communications services through simultaneous, multipleround auctions. in re implementation of section 309(j) of the communications act-competitive bidding, 9 fcc rcd. 2348, ~~ 54, 68 (1994). in accordance with 309(j) (3)(b) and (4)(a), it .....

Gauri Shankar Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

..... 760 only (in complaint case no. 88(c) of 2002 to the best of the judgment of opposite party no. 2 as per the provisions of section 144 of the act).4. the petitioner has contended that against this order of assessment he has preferred an appeal before the commissioner of income-tax (appeals)-ii, patna, ..... prayed that this criminal prosecution in the aforesaid cases and the entire proceeding against him including the order taking cognizance of the offence under the provisions of section 276c of the act be quashed. along with this for the present, he has prayed that the aforesaid criminal proceedings against him be stayed. in this order i will ..... are not being disposed of.2. five different complaint cases have been lodged against the present petitioner for having committed the offence under section 276c of the income-tax act, 1961 (in short 'the act'). in all these criminal cases the learned special judge, economic offences, patna, had passed an order taking cognizance of the offence under .....

P. Venkataramaiah and ors. Vs. the Station House Officer, Chittamur Po ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(4)ALT494

..... the complaint does not prima facie constitute any offence against the accused and/or that the fir does not disclose commission of any offence. 8. section 20 of the act deals with the acts prohibited in the reserve forest and penalties for trespass or damage in such forest. the said provision, relevant for the purpose, reads as under ..... 10. insofar as the second contention that petitioners stand exonerated of all the contraventions and offences as the second respondent has compounded the offence under section 59(1) of the act is concerned, in my considered opinion, the same though on the face of it appears to be formidable, a closer scrutiny would disclose the ..... fallacy of the contention. section 59 of the act deals with compounding of forest offences, which reads as under. 59. power to compound offences:- (1) any forest officer specially empowered in this behalf by .....

Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation Vs. K.R. Mahalingaiah and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003(3)KarLJ445; (2003)IILLJ766Kant

..... confidence that the workman would truthfully and faithfully carry on his duties and consequently the labour court rightly declined to exercise the power under section 11-a of the industrial disputes act to grant relief with minor penalty'.16. coming to the disciplinary authority taking note of the past records of the petitioner before inflicting ..... punishment of dismissal inflicted by the disciplinary authority is proportionate to the charge proved and whether a case for exercise of discretionary power under section 11-a of the industrial disputes act is made out. in this regard it is useful to refer to few recent judgments of the supreme court on the point.(i ..... pass an order dismissing him from service on 13-8-1994. aggrieved by the said order the respondent filed an application under section 10(4-a) of the industrial disputes act (karnataka amendment) act, 1988 before the iii additional labour court, bangalore, contending that one passenger gave rs. 100 note and purchased ticket and while .....

Md. Sukur Miya and anr. Vs. Singareni Collieries Company Limited and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD335; 2003(3)ALT765

..... a.p. state road transport corporation, who suffered disability while in service. as his services were terminated without providing any alternative employment, as provided under section 47 of the act, the petitioner approached this court and this court accepting the claim of the petitioner, set aside the impugned order of termination passed by the vice- ..... the counter it is also stated that the petitioners have not become disabled due to the accidents while in service and therefore, the provisions of section 47 of the act have no application. it is also stated that the petitioners were engaged in the underground minisg for which medical fitness is absolutely necessary and as ..... declaring the action of the respondents in terminating the services of the petitioners as illegal, without jurisdiction as well as contrary to the provisions of section 47 of the act.4. the above claim of the petitioners is contested by the respondent company by filing a counter. in the counter, it is stated that the .....

Sayed Mumtaz Ali, Deputy Station Manager Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Thr ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(5)BomCR328

V.C. Daga, J.1. Heard. Rule, made returnable forthwith by consent of parties.2. The petitioner in this case, amongst others, had challenged reduction of his basic pay from Rs. 7700/- to Rs. 7300/- by filing original application No. 2089 of 2001 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai ('the Tribunal' in short). The Tribunal, while deciding the case of the petitioner by order dated 21st September, 2001, set aside the recovery directed against the petitioner, but turned down the challenge to the reduction of his basic pay from Rs. 7700/- to Rs. 7300/- without giving any reason. The Tribunal rejected the contention of the petitioner in this behalf by one sentence order saying, 'While upholding the action of the respondents in refixing the applicants pay keeping in view the instructions governing the same, I direct that the recovery of amount of Rs. 53,325/- which represents the amount paid to him for the higher responsibility shouldered during 1978-81 be set aside.' Reading of t...

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ravindra and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4361; 2003(3)MPLJ460

..... to the death as a suicide. the marriage of meera bai took place about 13 years prior to the incident, therefore, presumption under section 113a of the evidence act cannot be drawn.15. the learned trial court properly and objectively considered the evidence to reach a conclusion that the respondents were not ..... has not established beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased meerabai committed suicide and the respondents abetted the commission of suicide.14. before recording conviction under section 306 of indian penal code the court must be satisfied that the accused persons by their conduct created such an inhumane situation or subjected the deceased ..... police station lalbhagh, burhanpur. after inquiry, the dead bodies, were sent for post mortem examination.3. after investigation a challan for the offences punishable under sections 306 and 498a of indian penal code was filed against the respondents before the judicial magistrate first class, burhanpur, wherefrom the case was committed to the .....

Management of Delhi Public School Vs. Presiding Officer and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR152(Jhr)]

..... according to the petitioner, the contract came to an end on 30th march, 1990 and therefore, the case of the petitioner is not covered under section 2(oo) of the act.7. i have examined the findings on this point and the reasons given for that in the award itself. it is found on perusal ofthe award ..... contract, the service of the respondent-workman came to an end and therefore, the termination does not amount to retrenchment as per section 2(oo) of the industrial disputes act and consequently section 25f of the act is not applicable and (iii) the respondent-workman had not worked for 240 days continuously and therefore, the question of applicability ..... to continue. in that circumstances, any termination will not be protected under clause (bb) of section 2(oo) of the act. in that circumstance, the termination will become a retrenchment requiring compliance of section 25f of the act and if without complying section 25f termination has been made, then i do not think that there is any perversity in .....