Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: us supreme court Year: 2006 Page 6 of about 69 results (0.294 seconds)

Jai NaraIn Parasrampuria (Dead) and ors. Vs. Pushpa Devi Saraf and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2007)1CompLJ69(SC); 2006(2)CTLJ130(SC); (2006)4MLJ1224(SC); 2006(8)SCALE477; (2006)7SCC756

..... was mandatory, such contract was to be warranted by the terms of the incorporation. the words 'ratified and adopted' have been dropped from the main section and in section 19 of the 1963 act, a proviso has been added that the company has accepted the contract and communicated such acceptance to the other party of the contract. an express ..... occupied or intended to be occupied as a separate dwelling, and(b) any yard, garden, outhouses and appurtenances belonging to it or usually enjoyed with it [housing act, 1996 (c. 52 1996), section 6b(1)]in 'word and phrases, permanent edition, volume 19a, it is stated:the word 'building' necessarily embraces the foundation on which it rests; and the ..... court must decide what is the most appropriate form for the relief to take. the aim is (as sir arthur hobhouse said in plimmer v. mayor of wellington (1884) 9 ac 699 to 'look at the circumstances in each case to decide in what way the equity can be satisfied'. the court approaches this task in a cautious .....

State of Madhya Pradesh and ors. Vs. Yogesh Chandra Dubey and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR332]; JT2006(8)SC595; (2006)IIILLJ1060SC; (2006)4MLJ932(SC); 2006(4)MPHT321; 2006(9)SCALE73; (2006)8SCC67; 2006(3)ShimLC284; 2007(2)SLJ186(SC)

..... means his personal legal condition only so far as his personal rights and burdens are concerned. duggamma v. ganeshayya : air1965kant97 at 101. [indian evidence act (1 of 1872), section 41.]in the language of jurisprudence status is a condition of membership of a group of which powers and duties are exclusively determined by law and not ..... under: (scc p.449, para 22)[we] hold that the workmen of a statutory canteen would be the workmen of the establishment for the purpose of the factories act only and not for all other purposes.see also municipal council, sujanpur v. surinder kumar .8. as the respondents did not hold any post, in our opinion, ..... constitutional obligation shall also be void. if no appointment could be made in terms of the statute, such appointment being not within the purview of the provisions of the act, would be void; he cannot be brought within the cadre of permanent employees. the definitions of 'permanent employee' and 'temporary employee' as contained in the rules must .....

The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Pudukottai, Tamil Nadu Vs. A. P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC51; 2006CriLJ4772; [2007(2)JCR54(SC)]; JT2006(12)SC590; 2007(1)MPHT1; 2007(1)OLR(SC)143; 2006(10)SCALE62; (2006)11SCC473

..... construed as references to the definition of 'owner' in clause (1) of section 2 of the mines act, 1952, which repealed and re-enacted 1923 act. consequently, the references to section 562 of old code in section 19 of the probation act and to section 5(2) of the old act in section 18 of the probation act, respectively have to be inevitably read as references to their corresponding provisions ..... be notification in the official gazette appoint. in state of tamil nadu it came into force in the entire state in the year 1964. section 19 of that act lays down that, subject to the provisions of section 18, section 562 of the criminal procedure code, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as 'old code') shall cease to apply to the states or parts in which the probation .....

Craft Interiors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalor ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(112)ECC616; 2006LC616(SC); 2006(203)ELT529(SC); JT2006(9)SC491; 2006(11)SCALE78; 2006(2)LC1428(SC)

markandey katju, j.1. these appeals have been filed under section 35l(b) of the central excise act, 1944 against the impugned order of the customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the tribunal'), south zone bench, bangalore dated 10.5.2005.heard learned ..... and not furniture, and hence were not subject to the levy of excise duty.in this connection we may refer to chapter sub-heading 9403 of the central excise tariff act, 1985 which reads as under:other furniture and parts thereof 6. learned counsel for the appellants submits that the word 'furniture' means objects which are moveable and are complete before .....

Pandey and Co. Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC465; 2007(1)ALLMR(SC)897; 2006(4)ARBLR192(SC); 2007(1)AWC837(SC); JT2006(10)SC414; 2006(11)SCALE665; (2007)1SCC467; 2007(2)CivilLJ783(SC); 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)1752; 2006AIRSCW5871

..... anr. : air2006sc450 but the same does not take away the effect of the appellate jurisdiction to be exercised by a court under sub-section (2) of section 37 of the 1996 act.section 42 of the 1996 act refers to applications and not to appeals. 14. reliance placed by the learned counsel on guru nanak foundation v. rattan singh and sons ..... words 'under those circumstances. 18. there exists a distinction between an appeal and an application. whereas section 31(4) of the 1940 act or section 42 of the 1996 act provides for an application, sub-section (2) of section 37 of the 1996 act provides for a statutory appeal. a forum of an appellate court must be determined with reference to ..... inasmuch as the word defined is said to mean a certain thing, it is possible for the word to have a somewhat different meaning in different sections of the act depending upon the subject or context. that is why all definitions in statutes generally begin with the qualifying words, similar to the words used in the .....

Srinivasa Rice Mill Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR233]; JT2006(10)SC305; 2006(11)SCALE694; 2006(2)LC1485(SC)

..... the learned employees' insurance court dismissed the applications. aggrieved thereby and dissatisfied therewith, appeals were preferred before the high court purported to be in terms of section 82 of the act. the said appeals, by reason of the impugned order, have been dismissed.3. mr. c. mukund, learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellants would ..... the control of the government whose employees are otherwise in receipt of benefits substantially similar or superior to the benefits provided under this act.'contribution' is defined in section 2(4) of the act to mean 'the sum of money payable to the corporation by the principal employer in respect of an employee and includes any ..... amount payable by or on behalf of the employee in accordance with the provisions of this act. 'factory' is defined under section 2(12) of the act which reads as under:2(12) 'factory' means any premises including the precincts thereof- (a) whereon ten or more persons are .....

Daulat Singh Surana and ors. Vs. First Land Acquisition Collector and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC471; 2007(2)ALD1(SC); 2007(1)AWC524(SC); [2008(2)JCR55(SC)]; JT2007(1)SC24; 2006(11)SCALE482; 2006AIRSCW5879; 2007(1)SCC641

..... rent to which he was entitled in law in appropriate proceedings. the appellant has failed to point out any infirmity as far as notification under section 4 and consequent declaration under section 6 of the act. section 4 of the notification is usually assailed on the ground of public purpose. therefore, we deem it appropriate to enumerate the concept of public ..... and partly at the expense of within the aforesaid ward of the calcutta municipal corporation in the city of calcutta.this declaration is made under the provision of section 6 of act 1 of 1894/read with the said notification, to all whom it may concern.a plan of the land may be inspected in the office of the ..... public purpose at the public expense within the aforesaid ward of the calcutta municipal corporation in the city of calcutta.this notification is made, under the provisions of section 4 of act i of 1894 to all whom it may concern.a plan of the land may be inspected in the office of the first land acquisition officer, calcutta, .....

Ayers Vs. Belmontes

Court : US Supreme Court

..... all of the evidence, the trier of fact shall consider, take into account and be guided by the aggravating and mitigating circumstances referred to in this section, and shall determine whether the penalty shall be death or confinement in state prison for a term of life without the possibility of parole. footnote 2 ..... 142. among those requested were two that specifically instructed the jury to consider respondent s ability to perform constructive work in prison and to live in confinement without acts of violence. see brief for respondent 5, n. 1. those instructions would have been entirely proper indeed, probably mandated under our holding in skipper . but the ..... evidence and comes to the court on federal habeas proceedings, but unlike payton, it was filed before the effective date of the antiterrorism and effective death penalty act of 1996 (aedpa). the ninth circuit distinguished payton on this ground, but erred in finding a reasonable probability that the jury did not consider evidence of .....

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC425; JT2007(1)SC45; 2007(1)KLT76(SC); 2006(12)SCALE338; [2009]91SCL183(SC)

..... s meeting of july 3, 1963 including the revision of the draft minutes were all in accordance with the provisions of the act and the university statutes and therefore the chancellor had no jurisdiction under section 9(4) of the act to annul the decision of the syndicate or the proceedings of the meeting of july 3, 1963. above being the position, ..... validly taken particularly as none present then had raised any protest against the alteration. the decision relied on by mr. jha in in re botherham alum and chemical company 1884 (25) c.d.103 is altogether on a different question and cannot be of any assistance.since the vice-chancellor was right in his understanding that what had been ..... decided at the meeting of may 7, 1963 was not to accept the commission's recommendation and since such refusal to accept meant under section 26(4) that the matter should be sent back to the commission for recommendation, his action in asking the commission to reconsider clearly fell under .....

Hotel and Restaurant Assocn. and anr. Vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC1168; (2007)1CompLJ46(SC); 2006(12)SCALE543; 2007[5]STR161

..... .s. garg v. state of u.p. and ors. : air2006sc2912 . we are, however, sure that trai while exercising its jurisdiction under sub-section (2) of section 11 of trai act shall proceed to exercise its jurisdiction without in any way being influenced by the said observations. it must apply its mind independently. 30. it may be ..... matters enumerated therein. clause (b) thereof empowers it inter alia to fix the terms and conditions of inter-connectivity between the service providers.sub-section (2) of section 11 of trai act contains a non-obstante clause providing that trai may frame from time to time by order (s) notified in the official gazette the rates ..... networks in the country and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. 'cable operator', 'cable service' and 'cable television network' as defined in section 2 of the 1995 act read as under:(aa) 'cable operator' means any person who provides cable service through a cable b1 television network or otherwise controls or is responsible .....