Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 2006 Page 5 of about 337 results (0.095 seconds)

The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board Vs. Subhash Chand and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1263; JT2006(3)SC393; (2006)IILLJ241SC; 2006(2)SCALE614; (2006)2SCC794; 2006(3)SLJ87(SC)

..... person means his personal legal condition only so far as his personal rights and burdens are concerned. dugganna v. ganeshayya : air1965kant97 , 101. [indian evidence act (1 of 1872), section 41]in the language of jurisprudence status is a condition of membership of a group of which powers and duties are exclusively determined by law and not ..... held that having regard to the nature of termination of services it would not come within the purview of the said definition, the question of applicability of section 25g of the act does not arise.12. in state of u.p. v. neeraj awasthi and ors. : (2006)illj721sc wherein this court upon taking into consideration the ..... with entire wages and thus this court should not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under article 136 of the constitution of india. 'retrenchment' has been defined in section 2(oo) of the act to mean:.2(oo) 'retrenchment' means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a .....

Musaraf HossaIn Khan Vs. Bhagheeratha Engg. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1288; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)653; 2006(2)AWC1749(SC); II(2006)BC515(SC); 2006(3)BomCR98; [2006]130CompCas390(SC); (2006)4CompLJ419(SC); 2006CriLJ1683; 2006(2)CTC57; JT2006

..... failed to make the payment within 15 days of the receipt of the notice.37. for the purpose of proving the aforementioned ingredients of the offence under section 138 of the act, the complainant-appellant was required to prove the facts constituting the cause of action therefore none of which arose within the jurisdiction of the kerala high court ..... petition. in the writ petition it merely wanted some time to make the payment. it is now well known that the object of the provision of section 138 of the act is that for proper and smooth functioning of business transaction in particular, use of cheques as negotiable instruments would primarily depend upon the integrity and honesty of ..... :.hd. considered. cog. is taken. examined the complainant mosaraf hossain on s/a. a prima facie case has been made out against the accused persons under section 138 n.i. act. issue summons upon the acids persons at once. to 3/2/05 for s/r & appear....6. the respondents allegedly received the summons sent to them .....

Maharashtra State Seeds Corpn. Ltd Vs. Haridas and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1480; 2006(4)BomCR834; [2006(109)FLR291]; JT2006(3)SC23; (2006)IILLJ107SC; 2006(2)SCALE584; (2006)3SCC690; 2006(2)SLJ433(SC)

..... law can be rectified by an officer. if the mistake of law has to be established by construing the words of a section to find its proper meaning, then such an error cannot normally be a rectifiable error under section 36. if two views are possible, then obviously the error will not be an error apparent from the record.18 as the ..... enquiry officer had no jurisdiction to recommend any punishment to be imposed on the respondent by the disciplinary authority, he although acted thereupon at the first instance, could have corrected ..... s.b. sinha, j. 1 the appellant herein is a company incorporated and registered under the companies act, 1956. it deals in production and supply of seeds to the farmers. the respondent herein was appointed as an assistant field officer. while he was working at nanded, misconducts committed .....

P. Mani Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1319; 2006CriLJ1629; 2006(3)CTC193; I(2006)DMC471SC; JT2006(2)SC607; 2006(I)OLR(SC)610; 2006(2)SCALE482; (2006)3SCC161

..... and then she bolted the room from inside. as they saw smoke coming out from the room, they rushed towards the same and broke open the door. section 106 of the evidence act to which reference was made by the high court in the aforementioned situation, cannot be said to have any application whatsoever.11. the high court furthermore commented upon ..... the said statements of the investigating officer and other witnesses inter alia on the ground that the burden of proof thereof lies upon the appellant in terms of section 106 of the evidence act as also, in view of the fact that the appellant did not suffer any bum injury.10. we do not agree with the high court. in ..... occurrence from 4.10.98 to 21.10.1998. the learned court opined that it was for the appellant herein to offer some explanation in terms of section 106 of the evidence act as the occurrence took place inside a room and the appellant was present therein. only because the deceased had undergone histectomy operation, the court was of the .....

Municipal Corporation Chandigarh and ors. Etc. Vs. Shantikunj Investme ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1270; 2006(1)CTLJ145(SC); JT2006(3)SC1; 2006(2)SCALE712; (2006)4SCC109

..... to both sets of cases i.e. allotment of commercial sites as well as residential, made by the chandigarh administration and chandigarh municipal corporation. section 2 of the act deals with definition. section 2(b) defines 'amenity' as under:2(b). 'amenity' includes roads, water-supply, street lighting, drainage, sewerage, public building, ..... . but to say that this is a condition precedent, that is not the correct approach in the matter. 'amenity' has been defined under section 2(b) of the act which includes roads, water-supply, street lighting, drainage, sewerage, public building, horticulture, landscaping and any other public utility service provided at chandigarh. ..... contended before us that the word, enjoy immovable property necessarily means that the administration should provide all the basic amenities as appearing under section 2(b) of the act for enjoying that allotment. the expression 'premium' appearing in the present context does not mean that the allot tees/ lessees cannot enjoy .....

Scheidler Vs. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 848 , 854 (2000) (holding that by using the term affecting commerce, congress did not define the crime described in [18 u. s. c.] 844(i) as the explosion of a building whose damage or destruction might affect interstate commerce, and noting that the court must look to other qualifying language in the provision to define the offense). for ..... second question requires an entry of judgment in petitioners favor, we shall not answer the first or third questions. ii we first set forth the hobbs act s text. the relevant statutory section imposes criminal liability on [w]hoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in ..... the reference in the physical violence clause to actions or threats of violence in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section seems to mean acts or threats of violence in furtherance of a plan or purpose to engage in robbery or extortion , for that is the only kind of behavior that .....

Bijoy Kumar Dugar Vs. Bidyadhar Dutta and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : II(2006)ACC36; 2006ACJ1058; AIR2006SC1255; 2006(3)ALT16(SC); 2006(2)AWC1456(SC); 2006(5)BomCR282; [2006]130CompCas325(SC); 2006(3)CTC122; [2006(3)JCR82(SC)]; JT2006(3)SC94; (2006)3SCC242

..... on the amount of compensation by the mact was not maintainable when it had not obtained the right to contest the proceedings on merit under section 170 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').16. as noticed in the earlier part of this judgment, the high court modified the award of the mact to the extent that the ..... (2). the appeal being a product of the statute it is not open to an insurer to take any plea other than those provided under section 149(2) of the act. however, in a situation where there is collusion between the claimant and the insurer or the insured does not contest the claim and further, if the mact does not ..... this court in sadhana lodh v. national insurance co. ltd. and anr. : [2003]1scr567 , dealing with the provisions of sections 173 and 149(2) of the act and the provisions of articles 226 and 227 of the constitution and also section 115 of the code of civil procedure, 1908, this court held that since the insurer has a remedy by filing an .....

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1383; (2006)4CompLJ330(SC); (2006)201CTR(SC)346; [2006]282ITR273(SC); JT2006(3)SC114; 2006(2)SCALE752; (2006)3SCC1; [2006]145STC91(SC); 2006[2]STR161; [2006]152

..... to use goods.24. gannon dunkerly declared that a transaction of sale of goods has to be under a contract i.e. it is consensual.25. section 4 of the telegraph act maintains the integrity of subject-matter of the licence viz, 'establish, maintain or work a telegraph'. therefore, the transaction of service is composite one not ..... casing, coating, tube or pipe enclosing the same, and any appliances and apparatus connected therewith for the purpose of fixing or insulating the same.58. section 4 of the 1885 act gives exclusive privilege in respect of telecommunication and the power to grant licences to the central government. pursuant to such power, licences have been granted to ..... regarding the first of such objections that the writ petitions have become infructuous - it may be true that in relation to the u.p. trade tax act, 1948, the challenge to section 2(h) and 3f which have basically re-produced article 366(29a) has not been pressed by the petitioners. what has been argued however, is for .....

The Commnr of Income Tax, West Bengal Iii Vs. Varas International (P) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2006)204CTR(SC)120; [2006]284ITR80(SC)

..... in holding that the privileged and specified fee as mentioned in rules 2 and 6 of the excise rules cannot be construed as the fee used in section 43b(a) of the income tax act, 1961?3) without prejudice to question no. (1) and (2) above whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and on a ..... were:1) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a correct interpretation of the amendment made by the finance act, 1988 to the section 43b(a) of the income tax act, 1961, which has been explained as clarificatory of legislative intention by the explanatory notes issued by the government, the tribunal was justified in law in ..... amendment of rule-6.7. the respondent/assessment's claim for deduction of the amounts payable was rejected by the i.t.o. on the ground that section 43b of the income tax act, 1961 applied. the assessee preferred an appeal to the commissioner. the commissioner dismissed the appeal holding 'fee payable to the government by whatever name it is .....

N. Khosla Vs. Rajlakshmi (Dead) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1249; 2006(2)ALD119(SC); 2006(2)ARBLR57(SC); 2006(2)AWC1911(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(3)CHN82; 102(2006)CLT76(SC); JT2006(3)SC200; (2006)2MLJ448(SC); 2006(I)OLR(SC)643; (

..... , title and interest in the sons in immovable property, the value of which was more than rupees one hundred only and thus, it compulsorily required registration under section 17 of the act. on this reasoning, the sub-judge declined to make the award as a rule of the court. aggrieved thereby, the two sons of dewan niranjan prasad filed ..... non-est. 7. on 1.8.1979, s/sh. k.j. khosla and n. khosla, the two sons of dewan niranjan prasad filed an application under section 14 of the arbitration act, 1940 for making the award a rule of the court. it appears that on 24.5.1981, notice of the application was issued to the respondents who filed ..... praesenti or in future any right, title or interest of the value of one hundred rupees and upwards to or in immovable property which requires registration under section 17(1)(b) of the registration act, 1908?a. abatement of appeal in respect of deceased smt. rajlakshmi & maintainability of the appeal qua other respondents11. mr. c.a. sundram, learned senior .....