Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 2006 Page 4 of about 337 results (0.249 seconds)

Gammon India Ltd. Vs. Spl. Chief Secretary and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD103(SC); JT2006(2)SC494; 2006(2)SCALE414; (2006)3SCC354; [2006]145STC1(SC)

..... purchase within the state of ap at concessional rate of tax against form-g under section 5b of the apgst act. in spite of the fact that m/s. gammon india limited, paloncha had effected purchases of cement from local registered dealers at concessional rate of ..... purchase raw materials, consumable, sub-assembly parts and packing materials at concessional rates for use in the manufacture or processing the goods in side the state under section 5b of the apgst act. in terms of g. o. ms. no. 496, rev.(ct-ii) dept., 17.07.2001, the commodity 'cement' was made ineligible to ..... reply to the abovementioned notices, a detailed objection petition was submitted by the appellant, according to which none of the essential conditions prescribed under section 5b(2) of apgs tax act was violated by the appellant.10. the assistant commissioner of commercial taxes after considering the grievance of the appellant confirmed the additional tax and penalty .....

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1325; 127(2006)DLT226; JT2006(2)SC448; 2006(2)SCALE364; (2006)3SCC399

..... the work to which the order relates to be demolished and the expenses of such demolition shall be recoverable from such person as an arrear of tax under this act.section 344 - order of stoppage of buildings or works in certain cases.--(1) where the erection of any building or execution of any work has been commenced or ..... premises. on the other hand, if misuser does not come within the ambit of 'unauthorised development', the power of sealing would be lacking. section 31a of the delhi development act reads as under:section 31a power to seal unauthorised development.--(1) it shall be lawful for the authority or the competent authority, as the case may be, at ..... with immunity and claim any right to use a building for a purpose other than authorised. further, the words 'unless the context otherwise requires' in section 331 of the dmc act are of no consequence for determining the point in issue as the context herein does not provide otherwise for the present purposes. it does not provide that .....

Ceat Ltd. Vs. Anand Abasaheb Hawaldar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1172; 2006(2)BomCR533; [2006(108)FLR1158]; JT2006(2)SC426; (2006)ILLJ1096SC; 2006(3)MhLj551; 2006(2)SCALE352; (2006)3SCC56; 2006(2)SLJ440(SC)

..... employees. under clause (5) of section 3 of the act the expression 'employee' only covers those who are workmen under clause (s) of section 2 of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (in short the 'id act'). the expression 'workman' as defined in clause (s) of section 2 of the id act relates to those who are existing ..... employees. the only addition to existing employees, statutorily provided under section 2(s) refers to dismissed, discharged ..... and retrenched employees and their grievances can be looked into by the forums created under the act. in the instant case, the complainants had resigned from service by voluntary retirement and, .....

Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Sri Rama Krishna Ri ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1445; 2006(2)BomCR517; [2007(1)JCR234(SC)]; JT2006(2)SC516; 2006(1)KLT931(SC); 2006(2)SCALE409; (2006)3SCC74

..... energy of the andhra pradesh state electricity board was filed. the said terms and conditions of supply were notified by the board in exercise of powers conferred by section 49 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948. a prayer was made to grant opportunity to cross examine certain officials of the appellant no. 1-corporation on the basis of whose statements the final ..... statements or reports, may be the cross examination of any person who has prepared the accounts is not necessary. but if any statement or report is made pointing out the act of pilferage, the petitioner shall be entitled to call the said person for cross examination.4. learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the high court's view about the .....

Krishnaswamy S. Pd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2006)201CTR(SC)183; [2006]281ITR305(SC); JT2006(2)SC536; 2006(2)SCALE441; (2006)3SCC286

..... 37-i along with certain documents on 29.10.1987. thereafter, the appropriate authority passed an order dated 18.12.1987 purported to be under section 269ud(1) of the act, for pre-emptive purchase of the said property by the central government at an amount equal to the apparent consideration. it was stated that the reasons ..... cause notice is issued....43. we may clarify that as far as completed transactions are concerned, namely, where after the order for compulsory purchase under section 269ud of the income tax act was made and possession has been taken over, compensation paid to the owner of the property and accepted without protest, we see no reason to ..... reasons in writing and such reasons must be germane to the object for which chapter xx-c was introduced in the income tax act, namely, to counter attempts to evade tax. reading down of section 269ud in the above manner, to uphold its validity, necessitated issue of certain consequential directions. we extract below the relevant portions .....

Arbaugh Vs. Y and H Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a person . 2000e(b).[ footnote 1 ] this employee-numerosity requirement[ footnote 2 ] appears in a section headed definitions, 2000e, which also prescribes the meaning, for title vii purposes, of 12 other terms used in the act.[ footnote 3 ] congress has broadly authorized the federal courts to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over all civil ..... s., at 247.[ footnote 9 ] the basic statutory grants of federal-court subject-matter jurisdiction are contained in 28 u. s. c. 1331 and 1332. section 1331 provides for [f]ederal-question jurisdiction, 1332 for [d]iversity of citizenship jurisdiction. a plaintiff properly invokes 1331 jurisdiction when she pleads a colorable claim ..... vii contains a separate jurisdictional provision, 42 u. s. c. 2000e 6(b), authorizing suits by the government to enjoin pattern or practice discrimination. footnote 5 section 1367(a) states: except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by federal statute, in any civil action of which .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. Laxmi Cattle Feed Industries

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1452; 2006(2)AWC1253(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ185(SC); [2006(3)JCR67(SC)]; JT2006(2)SC552; 2006(2)SCALE468; (2006)2SCC699

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Appellant-Corporation calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissing the First Appeal questioning correctness of the order dated 13.11.1987 of learned Additional District Judge, Delhi who had granted a decree of Rs. 81,442.53 with interest in favour of the respondent who was the plaintiff before the Trial Court. 2. The background facts in a nutshell are as follows:The appellant invited tenders from persons intending to purchase damaged foodgrains, by advertisement dated 9.6.1983. Tender submitted by the respondent was accepted on 22.7.1983. It is to be noted that the respondent was one of the successful bidders. Certain terms of the agreement which shall be indicated in detail stipulated payment of the price and the consequence of failure to do so i.e. levy of storage charges for the stock not lifted and interest. The tendered quantity was 2246 M.T. of damaged foodgrains. Respondent deposited certain amoun...

M.P. Housing Board and anr. Vs. Manoj Shrivastava

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC3499; 101(2006)CLT580(SC); [2006(109)FLR194]; JT2006(3)SC73; (2006)IILLJ119SC; 2006(2)SCALE572; (2006)2SCC702; 2006(2)SLJ464(SC)

..... to the respondent. he thereafter filed an application before the labour court purported to be in terms of section 31(3) read with section 64-a of the madhya pradesh industrial relations act, 1960 (for short 'the 1960 act') praying that he be classified in the permanent category on the ground that he had satisfactorily worked for ..... , which is a 'state' within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution of india, upon compliance of the constitutional requirements as also the provisions of the 1972 act or the rules and regulations framed thereunder.12. in mahendra l. jain and ors. v. indore development authority and ors. : (2005)illj578sc , this court followed ..... obligation shall also be void. if no appointment could be made in terms of the statute, such appointment being not within the purview of the provisions of the act would be void; he cannot be brought within the cadre of permanent employees. the definitions of 'permanent employee' and 'temporary employee' as contained in the rules .....

Punjab State Civil Supplies Corp. Ltd Vs. Sikander Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1438; 102(2006)CLT3(SC); JT2006(3)SC457; (2006)IILLJ14SC; (2006)143PLR206; 2006(2)SCALE670; (2006)3SCC736

..... ) by l.rs. : [1973]3scr364 , the question which arose for consideration was as to whether a director having regard to the provisions of section 235 of the companies act, committed acts of misfeasance. the said decision ex facie has no application in the present case. therein, this court was concerned with a case where the director was ..... and mala fide orders and proceedings and also by fabricating official records. such a suit for damages is certainly not within the province of section 14.20. thus, tortious acts, being not the ones which could be subject matter of departmental proceedings or negligence under a contract of employment, cannot give rise to a ..... trust vis-&agrve;-vis the shareholders of the company. in that case all the directors were found to have committed acts of fraud. the court took recourse to the provisions of section 45h of the companies act wherein special provisions for assessing damages against delinquent directors have been laid down. 24. reliance has also been placed .....

Standard Chartered Bank and ors. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1301; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)614; II(2006)BC391(SC); 2006(3)BomCR621; (2006)2CALLT42(SC); [2006]130CompCas341(SC); 127(2006)DLT747(SC); 2006(197)ELT18(SC); JT2006(3)SC421; (2006)4SCC278

..... for decision. on the whole, we are satisfied that there is no justification in accepting the argument that unless an adjudication proceeding under section 51 of the act is completed, a prosecution under section 56 of fera cannot be initiated. both proceedings can simultaneously be launched and can simultaneously be pursued.22. counsel submitted that the ..... precede the making of a complaint in writing to the concerned court for prosecuting the offender. the absence of a similar proviso to section 56 or to section 51 of the present act, is also a clear indication that the legislature intended to treat the two proceedings as independent of each other. obviously, the legislature ..... those aspects in these appeals. suffice it to say, that the arguments on this score are of no avail while considering the constitutional challenge to section 68 of the act as being violative of articles 14 and 21 of the constitution. we reject the contention, leaving it to the concerned appellant to raise that plea .....