Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 1989 Page 5 of about 183 results (0.081 seconds)

Mar 28 1989 (SC)

Kothandran Spg. Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-28-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1331; [1989]66CompCas1(SC); (1989)2CompLJ41(SC); JT1989(2)SC19; 1989(1)SCALE722; (1989)2SCC481; [1989]2SCR127; 1989(2)LC114(SC)

..... undertakings whose management was to be taken over and possession was, therefore, taken by respondent no. 2 in terms of the provisions of section 4(1) thereof. the ordinance was replaced by act 72 of 1972 which received presidential assent on 23.12.1972 but was deemed to be in force from 31.10.1972. the ..... 2) every sick textile undertaking which stands vested in the central government by virtue of sub-section (1) shall, immediately after it has so vested, stand transferred to, and vested in, the national textile corporation.the first schedule to the act against entry 96 shows the petitioner's mills. there is a legislative determination that petitioner no ..... in the central government under the sick textile undertakings (taking over of management) act, 1972. it is not disputed that management of petitioner no. 1 had been taken over under the 1972 act and petitioner no. 1, therefore, came within the definition.5. section 3 provides:3(1) on the appointed day, every sick textile undertaking and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1989 (SC)

Jaloba Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-1989

Reported in : 1989Supp(2)SCC197

..... is on the face of it untenable in the light of sections 6 and 9 of the act. section 6 lays down that if in any area notified by the state government under the act a person contravenes any provision or rule made under the arms act, the explosives act, the explosive substances act and the inflammable substances act then he is liable to enhanced punishment as provided for in ..... the section. section 9 lays down that notwithstanding anything contained in the code, every offence punishable under the act or any rule made thereunder shall be triable only by the designated court within whose local .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1989 (SC)

Bansidhar and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1614; JT1989(2)SC518; 1989(1)SCALE1091; (1989)2SCC557; [1989]2SCR152; 1989(2)LC295(SC); 2(1989)WLN(Rev)90

..... law to any case, not already finally concluded thereunder, as impermissible in law as unreasonable in its consequences if permitted. it was urged that section 3 of the 1973 act was a clinching indicator in this behalf when it provided that the provisions of the later law 'shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained ..... the provisions of the new enactment would have to be looked into not for the purpose of ascertaining whether the consequences envisaged by section 6 of the general clauses act ensued or not ..sec. 6 would indeed be attracted unless the new legislation manifests a contrary intention but only for the purpose of determining whether the ..... even if there is simultaneous enactment unless a contrary intention can be gathered from the new enactment. of course, the consequences laid down in section 6 of the act will apply only when a statute or regulation having the force of a statute is actually repealed....addressing itself to the question whether, having regard .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1989 (SC)

Smt. Lata Kamat Vs. Vilas

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1477; [1989]2ITR48(SC); JT1989(3)SC48; 1989MPLJ372(SC); 1989(1)SCALE867; (1989)2SCC613; [1989]2SCR137; 1989(2)LC192(SC)

..... for divorce' whereas in the present case, the marriage was not dissolved by decree of divorce. the marriage was declared as nullity under sections 11 and 12 of the act. sections 11 and 12 of the act, according to the learned counsel, talk of annulment of marriage 'by decree of nullity and it was contended that it is because of ..... of the court given in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction.(2) orders made by the court in any proceeding under this act, under section 25 or section 26 shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (3) be appealable if they are not interim orders, and every such appeal shall lie to the court to which appeals ordinarily ..... instituted a petition on 7th march, 1984 for a declaration that the marriage of the respondent with the appellant wife was a nullity under sub-section (1) sub-clause (d) of section 12 of the act on the ground that appellant, the wife at the time of marriage with the respondent was pregnant by some one other than the respondent. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1989 (SC)

Shakuntalabai and anr. Vs. L.V. Kulkarni and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1359; JT1989(1)SC607; 1989(1)SCALE737; (1989)2SCC526; [1989]2SCR70

..... method. uzagar singh v. mst. jeo : air1959sc1041 , laid down that the ordinary rule is that a custom, general or otherwise, has to be proved under section 57 of the evidence act. however, nothing need be proved of which the courts can take judicial notice. when a custom has been judicially recognised by the court then it passes into ..... the law of the land as proof of it becomes unnecessary under section 57(1) of the evidence act. 'in regard to marriage', says sir gooroodas banerjee, 'the ordinary hindu law does not, and cannot, form the common rule for all sects alike ..... custom of udiki form of marriage in panchamasale subject of lingayat community. i belong to panchamamasale subject there is also a custom for dissolution of marriage in our section. the dissolution of my marriage with gurulingappa was effected by my declaration in the presence of elders, that i did not require gurulingappa as my husband and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1989 (SC)

Builders Association of India and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1371; 1989(2)ARBLR356(SC); (1989)2CompLJ1(SC); JT1989(2)SC47; 1989(1)SCALE770; (1989)2SCC645; [1989]2SCR320; [1989]73STC370(SC)

..... of article 366, the sales tax law of a state which provides for levy of sales tax thereon will have to comply with the restrictions mentioned in section 15 of the central sales tax act, 1956. clause (b) is an additional provision which empowers parliament to impose any additional restrictions or conditions in regard to the levy of sales tax on ..... the contract for the purpose of executing a works contract cannot be treated as a part of the taxable turnover. the restrictions and conditions contained in section 15 of the central sales-tax act, 1956, on the power of the states to levy lax on the sale of declared goods apply equally and fully to transfer of properly in goods ..... suffered sales tax at an earlier point in the state and whether on such goods the tax which was being levied exceeded the limit prescribed by section 15 of the central sales tax act, 1956, they did not also take into consideration whether the sale of the goods in question had been exempted under the sales tax laws of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1989 (SC)

Kali Prasad Agarwall and ors. Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1531; JT1989(3)SC170; 1989(1)SCALE852; 1989Supp(1)SCC628; [1989]2SCR283; 1989(2)LC218(SC)

..... suit and we, therefore, refrain from expressing any opinion on the first question. on the second question, the relevant provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 (the act) may now be noted.section 2(h) defines 'mines' to mean any excavation where any operation for the purpose of searching for or obtaining minerals has been or is being carried ..... of the said mine, namely, stacking of the coal and effecting local sale thereof. it is, therefore, a mine as defined under section 2(h)(h)(vi) of the act.15. under section 3 of the act, the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to the coal mines stand transferred to and shall vest absolutely in the ..... of the view that a lease granted to the plaintiffs in the instant case was an encumbrance and it was annihilated with the issuance of the notification under section 3 of the act. the submission urged on behalf of the appellants, therefore, in this behalf must be accepted. the lease of the plaintiffs having come to an end .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1989 (SC)

Jammu and Kashmir State Forest Corporation Vs. Abdul Karim Wani and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1498; JT1989(3)SC99; 1989(1)SCALE933; (1989)2SCC701; [1989]2SCR380; 1989(2)LC262(SC)

..... wholly without jurisdiction. for this reference may be made to section 41 of the arbitration act which provides that for the purpose of and in relation to arbitration proceedings, the court has such powers to pass interim orders for detention, preservation, interim ..... the high court is bad.19. the second challenge to the order of the high court was that the order so far as it directed under section 20 of the arbitration act that the petitioner be allowed to do the remaining work of the extraction of timber of standing marked trees in compartment no. 59 marwah, was ..... in this case it was contended on behalf of the appellant-corporation that the corporation could not be compelled by the process of an application under section 20 of the arbitration act to grant additional work to the contractor. on the other hand, the contractor had pleaded that where the achievement of the contractor in respect of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1989 (FN)

Mississippi Choctaw Indians Vs. Holyfield

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-03-1989

..... 393 f.supp. 719 (wd mich.1973) (discussing custom of extended family and tribe assuming responsibility for care of orphaned children). [ footnote 5 ] section 1911(a) reads in full: "an indian tribe shall have jurisdiction exclusive as to any state over any child custody proceeding involving an indian child who ..... and family service programs." house report, at 8 (footnote omitted). see also 124 cong.rec. 38102 (1978) (remarks of rep. udall) ("[the act] clarifies the allocation of jurisdiction over indian child custody proceedings between indian tribes and the states. more importantly, it establishes minimum federal standards and procedural ..... parental rights termination proceedings, and that this practice caused serious problems for the children, their parents, and their tribes, congress enacted the indian child welfare act of 1978 (icwa), which, inter alia, gives tribal courts exclusive jurisdiction over custody proceedings involving an indian child "who resides or is domiciled within" .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1989 (SC)

Aslam Ahmed Zahire Ahmed Shaik Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1403; [1990]67CompCas335(SC); 1989CriLJ1447; 1989(2)Crimes111(SC); 1989(22)ECC308; 1989(42)ELT330(SC); JT1989(2)SC34; 1989(1)SCALE840; (1989)3SCC277; [1989]2SCR415

..... against him by the joint secretary, ministry of finance (department of revenue). government of india, new delhi under section 3(1) of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 (hereinafter referred as the 'act') with a view to preventing the appellant from indulging in activities prejudicial to the augmentation of country's foreign ..... with the earlier return of the detaining authority. the explanation given in the subsequent return recites that the representation forwarded by the detenu was received in the cofeposa section of ministry of finance on june 27, 1988 and that after receiving the comments from the sponsoring authority on 11.7.88 the said file was > ..... was on tour and on his return the representation was forwarded to the finance minister on 17-7.88 and the file was received back in cofeposa section on 19.7.88 and the order of rejection was communicated to the detenu who received it on 26th july 1988. this explanation has been accepted by .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //