Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 1989 Page 10 of about 183 results (0.103 seconds)

Jun 26 1989 (FN)

H.J. Inc. Vs. Nw Bell Tel. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-26-1989

..... least two racketeering predicates committed within a 10-year period are necessary to establish a rico page 492 u. s. 230 pattern, but implies that two acts may not be sufficient. section 1961(5) thus assumes that there is something to a pattern beyond merely the number of predicates involved. in normal usage, the word "pattern" ..... whatever "pattern" might mean in rico, it assuredly does not mean that, "[w]here congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same act, it is generally presumed that congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion." russello v. united states, 464 u. s. 16 , 464 u ..... c. 3575(e), which defined the term "pattern of conduct which was criminal" used in a different title of the same act, and instructed them that "[t]his language may be useful in interpreting other sections of the act," 473 u.s. at 473 u. s. 496 , n. 14. thus enlightened, the district courts and courts of appeals .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1989 (SC)

Sundarjas Kanyalal Bhathija and Others Vs. the Collector, Thane, Mahar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-13-1989

Reported in : AIR1990SC261; AIR1991SC1893; (1990)92BOMLR13; [1990]68CompCas20(SC); 1989(25)LC129(SC); [1990]183ITR130(SC); JT1989(3)SC57; 1989(2)SCALE7; (1989)3SCC396; [1989]3SCR405; 19

..... their suggestions in that behalf after a notification under sub-section (3) read with sub-section (4) of section (3) of the act is issued. since the popular local self-government is not in existence in any of the municipal councils or even in the newly established ..... issued.x x x in the result, therefore, the rule is made partly absolute and the state government is directed to exercise its power under section 3 sub-section (3) of the act in accordance with law within a period of six months. it is needless to say that the petitioners will be entitled to raise objections and make ..... that the decision taken in that behalf was tentative, i.e. for the time being and it is not all-time permanent decision. under sub-section (3) of section 3 of the act, the state government has power to exclude or include any area specified in the notification issued so far as ambarnath town is concerned, reconsideration of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1989 (SC)

Gurdial Batra Vs. Raj Kumar Jain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-18-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1841; JT1989(3)SC96; (1989)96PLR313; 1989(2)SCALE17; (1989)3SCC441; [1989]3SCR423; 1989(2)LC460(SC)

..... conclusion, the order of eviction was reversed.6. letting of a premises can broadly be for residential or commercial purpose. the restriction which is statutorily provided in section 13(2)(ii)(b) of the act is obviously one to protect the interests of the landlord and is intended to restrict the use of the landlord's premises taken by the tenant under ..... even without structural alteration. the concept of injury to the premises which forms the foundation of clause (o) is the main basis for providing clause (o) in section 13(2)(ii) of the act as a ground for the tenant's eviction. the privy council in u po naing v. burma oil co. air 1929 pc 108 adopted the same consideration. the ..... . along with the repair business, sale of televisions was temporarily carried on. we do not think this constituted a change of user within the meaning of section 13(2)(ii)(b) of the act so as to give a cause of action to the landlord to seek eviction of the tenant.9. the appeal is allowed and the order of eviction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1989 (SC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. North Telumer Colliary and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-19-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1728; (1989)3CompLJ80(SC); JT1989(3)SC125; 1989(2)SCALE54; (1989)3SCC411; [1989]3SCR455; 1989(2)LC479(SC)

..... of the erstwhile owner lying in the hands of the commissioner of payment would include the interest which has been paid to the commissioner under section 18(5). similarly section 24 of the coal act says that unsecured creditors will be paid out of the money credited to the account of coal mine. moneys credited to the account of coal ..... a coal mine do not include the money accrued by way of interest. there is no basis for this interpretation. the plain reading of section 26 read with section 18(5) of the coal act makes it clear that moneys paid to the commissioner in relation to a coal mine are to be used for satisfying the debts and liabilities. ..... meeting the liabilities of all the secured and unsecured creditors, he shall disburse such balance to the owner of such coal mine.5. relevant provisions of the coal act are reproduced hereinafter.section 3 acquisition of rights of owners in respect of coal mines. (1) on the appointed day, the right, title and interest of the owners in relation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1989 (SC)

State of U.P. Vs. Jodha Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-19-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1822; 1989CriLJ2113; 1989(3)Crimes7(SC); JT1989(3)SC112; 1989(2)SCALE19; (1989)3SCC465

..... accused had deliberately attacked the decased and pw-1 with an intention to kill them. on the other hand it is a case which would fall under exception 4 to section 300 i.p.c. the high court has failed to notice this position because of its obsession over minor details in the case.20. on the question whether all ..... several injuries, if jairam singh and his sons were the aggressors and if only a-2 and a-3 were present at the scene they could not have by their acts of self-defence alone caused the death of two persons and also caused injuries to pw-1. another significant factor is that the two deceased and pw-1 had ..... learned counsel appearing for the accused disputed the statement of the appellant's counsel and contended that the prosecution case suffers from many infirmities and therefore the high court had acted correctly in setting aside the convictions and acquitting the accused.11. on a careful consideration of the relevant materials and the arguments of the counsel for the state and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 1989 (SC)

Navtej Singh Vs. Satish Kumar Khurana and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-20-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1758; JT1989(3)SC122; 1989(2)SCALE47; (1989)3SCC418; 1989(2)LC468(SC); (1990)1UPLBEC9

..... sethi, clerk of sh. d.s. patial, advocate (central hall) tis hazari courts, delhi, may kindly be summoned as witness by the bar council of india, under section 42 of the advocates act, because i apprehend that he may not appear on my request, as before.3. it is also submitted most humbly and respectfully that i may also kindly be ..... keen on examining g.k. sethi, he ought to have moved the disciplinary committee to issue summons to g.k. sethi in exercise of its powers under section 42 of the advocates act to appear before the committee and give evidence in the matter. having failed to do so, the appellant cannot now allege that the disciplinary committee had failed to ..... /- given by him towards the filing of a suit against messrs. roneo vickers (india) ltd. the first respondent's case was that since he had engaged the appellant to act as his advocate in certain earlier legal proceedings, he requested him to file a suit against messrs. roneo vickers (india) ltd. for recovery of a sum of rs. 17 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1989 (SC)

Supreme Court Employees' Welfare Association and Ors. Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-24-1989

Reported in : AIR1990SC334; JT1989(3)SC188; (1989)IILLJ506SC; 1989(2)SCALE107; (1989)4SCC187; [1989]3SCR488; 1990(1)LC40(SC); (1990)3UPLBEC1604

..... to the central government compelling it to bring the provisions of section 3 of the forty-fourth amendment act into force.54. on the basis of the principles of law laid down in the above decisions, it is urged by the learned attorney ..... v. union of india : 1982crilj340 . what happened in that case was that by a notification the central government had brought into force all the sections of the forty-fourth amendment act except section 3. the question before this court was whether this court could issue a writ of mandamus directing the central government to bring into force ..... section 3 of the forty-fourth amendment act. it has been observed by chandrachud, c.j. delivering the majority judgment that a mandamus cannot be issued .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1989 (SC)

State of Orissa and anr. Vs. Dr Asim Kumar Mohanty and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-24-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1801; 69(1990)CLT12(SC); JT1989(3)SC174; 1989(2)SCALE90; (1989)3SCC549; 1989(2)LC664(SC)

Ranganath Misra, J.1. These are two appeals by special leave and are directed against a common judgment of the Orissa High Court dated August 3, 1988, whereby the High Court directed the two respondents and another to be admitted to the two year in service medical post-graduate course for the session 1988-89.2. The Prospectus published by the State Government indicated that the total number of seats were 113 out of which 17 seats were reserved for scheduled castes candidate while 6 were so reserved for scheduled tribe candidates. Paragraph 5.3 of the Prospectus indicated the various classifications and it was stated therein : 'number of general seats to be filled up by in service doctors of Government of Orissa is 69'.3. The note under paragraph 1.2 of the Prospectus defined 'in service doctor' as 'one who is in the employment of the Government of Orissa, Government of Orissa Public Sector Undertakings and other Organisations under the Orissa Government and Government of India. This in...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 1989 (SC)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Narayan Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1789; 1989CriLJ2101; 1989(3)Crimes16(SC); JT1990(3)SC239; 1989(2)SCALE93; (1989)3SCC596; [1989]3SCR549; 1989(2)LC700(SC)

..... nathu lal's case.8. the high court i hereafter proceeded to consider the further amendment effected to section 7 of the act pursuant to the recommendation of the law commission in its 47th report.9. though for the purpose of the two appeals on hand, it would be ..... as an essential condition of the of fence was excluded so that every contravention whether intentional or otherwise was made an offence under section 7 of the act. thus by introducing these words in section 7 by the aforesaid statutory amendment, (he legislature made its intention explicit and nullified the effect of the supreme court dicta in ..... licence and the provisions of the licensing order. consequently, the collector ordered confiscation of 100 tins of groundnut oil from out of the 3971 ins under section 6(1) of the essential commodities act. on the firm preferring an appeal, the appellate authority, viz. additional sessions judge, kaira at nadiad held 'that clause (11) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 1989 (SC)

Mehboob Khan Nawab Khan Pathan Vs. Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC1803; 1989CriLJ2111; (1990)1GLR142(SC); JT1989(3)SC168; 1989(2)SCALE69; (1989)3SCC568

..... concerned in writ petition no. 479/88-three cases registered against the petitioner are referred to have '. been considered for bringing him within the meaning of section 2(c) of the act and those cases are mentioned under serial nos. 2, 3 and 4 of annexure 'd'. it is not in controversy as in the case of writ ..... only two cases, registered against the detenu mehboobkhan are shown to have been considered for holding that the petitioner is a 'dangerous person' within the definition of section 2(c) of the act. these two cases are shown under sl. nos. 2 and 4 of annexure '. 'd', extracted above. it is not in dispute that this writ ..... ahmedabad, the first respondent herein, in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (i) of section 3 of the gujarat prevention of anti-social activities act, 1985-hereinafter referred to as the 'act'-with a view to preventing the petitioners/detenues from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order in the area of ahmedabad city. all .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //