Array ( [0] => ..... operative banks not to go for fresh recruitment to any post without the approval of the competent authority. he further submitted that section 33-a read with section 123-a of the orissa co-operative societies act, 1962 conferred power on the government to issue such instructions and circulars prohibiting the co-operative societies to make any appointment. ..... others (supra) the supreme court held that the power of review available to the administrative tribunal is the same as has been given to a court under section 114 read with order 47, cpc and is not absolute and is hedged in by the restrictions indicated in order 47, cpc. the restrictions on power of ..... department in annexure-1 series to the review petition are statutory instructions issued by the government in exercise of its power under sections 33-a and 123-a of the orissa co-operative societies act and appointment of smt. basanti swain, the writ petitioner contrary to the said statutory instructions/circulars were illegal and hence, no ..... [1] => ..... and decided in favour of the informant with reasons and, therefore, there is no justification for this court to reconsider the same question again in exercise of the powers under section 482, cr. p.c.4. shri mohanty, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that a bare reading of the f.i.r. and the statements of the ..... dowry at the above places. accordingly, on the basis of such allegations the case was registered for commission of offences under sections 498-a, 406 and 34 of the penal code read with section 4 of the dowry prohibition act. on completion of investigation, charge-sheet was submitted for commission of the offences mentioned above and in the impugned order charge ..... learned j.m.f.c., baripada in g.r. case no. 214 of 1999 framing charge for commission of offences under sections 498-a, 406 and 34 of the penal code read with sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act.2. petitioner no. 1 is the husband of the informant, puja shaw. the f.i.r. has been lodged on ..... [2] => ..... civil revision petition.3. petitioner is the respondent and the opposite party is the applicant in title suit no. 750 of 2001 instituted for the relief under section 9 of the hindu marriage act, 1955. that suit has been instituted and pending in the court of civil judge (senior division), balasore. inter se relationship between the petitioner and the ..... the petitioner is a young woman aged 25 years and she is to be accompanied by a child aged about two years. notwithstanding the fact that section 19 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 allows the option to the applicant to institute the suit at any of the three places enumerated therein and the court at balasore has the local ..... jurisdiction to decide the issue but at the same time section 24 of the code authorises the court to pass order of transfer of the suit appeal ..... [3] => ..... such deed of conveyances were created in favour of mir kefayat his name found place in the r.o.r. in ext.3 which suggest that such sale deeds were acted upon accordingly the name of the purchaser was recorded in the r.o.r. the purchaser mir kefayat again sold the property to dhuma under the sale deed dated 29 ..... [4] => ..... the facts of the present; case are different than that of the decision referred to above, the principle laid down by the apex court while interpreting section 20-a of the act fully apply to the present case. there being no other evidence available on record at this stage except the statement of the co-accused. i am ..... availability of evidence to show that the adulteration had taken place at the hands of the manufacturer. in support of his contention, the learned counsel referred to section 20-a of the act and also relied upon a decision of the apex court in the case of m/s. omprakash shivprakash v. k.i. kuriakose and ors. reported in ..... . after the learned magistrate took cognizance of the said offence, an application was filed by the petitioner for reconsideration of the order taking cognizance referring to section 20-a of the act.3. shri pujari, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the learned magistrate could not have taken cognizance of the offence so far as ..... [5] => ..... order dated 23.7.2002 passed by the learned 1st additional sessions judge, berhampur in s.c. no. 26 of 1999 rejecting the petition filed by the accused-petitioner under section 311 of the code of criminal procedure to summon the revenue inspector, kelua for the purpose of production of village settlement map. r.o.r. etc.2. from the impugned ..... is the i.o. was examined, cross-examined and evidence from the side of the prosecution was closed. on , the said date a petition was filed by the petitioner under section 311 of the code of criminal procedure to summon the revenue inspector, kelua to cause production of the village settlement map of village gothagam, khatian and r.o.r. of ..... [6] => pradip mohanty, j.1. this appeal is one under section 173(1) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') against the order dated 19.9.1996 passed by the 3rd motor accidents claims tribunal, balasore, in m.a.c.t. case no. 38/106 (c) of 1996/94.2. ..... [7] => ..... 2 commenced the aforesaid civil proceeding no. 262 of 1996 in the court of learned judge, family court, cuttack by a petition under section 22 of the indian divorce act, 1869 read with section 7 of the family courts act, 1984 for a decree of divorce against petitioner no. 1 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.3. admittedly, the parties belong ..... . 2) were born who are now grown-up. the son is married and is carrying on business. opposite party no. 2 in his petition under section 22 of the indian divorce act, 1869 alleged that petitioner no. 1 with the help of their major son and daughter tried to kick him out.of the house. she started misbehaving with ..... the present case is a case covered under the principal act. the principal act has come to be amended by the indian divorce (amendment) act, 2001 (act 51 of 2001) which has come into force with effect from 3.10.2001 by virtue of which sections 17 and 20 of the principal act stand amended dispensing with the provision of confirmation of the ..... [8] => ..... se dispute, ends of justice and equity demands that an opportunity should be given to the petitioner to examine some of the witnesses in exercise of the power conferred under section 311 cr.p.c. but then, after hearing the counsel. i am satisfied that the courts below have not committed any irregularity in rejecting the petition . filed by ..... thus, the word 'shall' in the second clause is mandatory and imperative in nature and character and the word 'may' in the first clause, is directory. in short, under section 311 of the code, the power of the court to examine a witness for a just decision of the case, cannot be curtailed in any manner or beyond any state ..... 'may' and 'shall' in the same provision which means the legislature did not leave it to the discretion of the court to intrepret both the expressions. reading of the section would lead to a conclusion that at any stage of inquiry, trial or other proceeding if the court so requires, it 'may summon' any person as witness or examine any ..... [9] => ..... s.c. 536 (vencil pusparaj v. state of rajasthan). the law is well settled that in order to bring an accused under the purview of section 34 i.p.c. he must have acted in concert or there was existence of pre-arranged plan to commit murder of the deceased in order that common intention on the part of the accused ..... that of appellant sauki. we are fully convinced that case of appellant gangadhar is not at all different from that of appellant sauki. as such, act of gangadhar can be brought within the purview of section 34 of the indian penal code for having common intention withappellant sauki in stabbing the deceased. as such, the contention of the appellants, counsel having ..... . to him. appellant sauki stands in a different footing from that of appellant gangadhar. in such a view of the matter he has urged that act of appellant gangadhar cannot be brought within hie purview of section 34 of indian penal code.21. relying on 1988 (1) o.l.r. 626 (tunu puturi and ors. v. state of orissa) appellants ..... ) Explosives Act 1884 Section 4 Definitions - Sortby Old - Court Orissa - Year 2003 - Page 5 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: orissa Year: 2003 Page 5 of about 137 results (0.407 seconds)

Mar 28 2003 (HC)

Co-operative Agricultural Rural Development Bank Ltd., Represented Thr ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-28-2003

Reported in : 96(2003)CLT159

..... operative banks not to go for fresh recruitment to any post without the approval of the competent authority. he further submitted that section 33-a read with section 123-a of the orissa co-operative societies act, 1962 conferred power on the government to issue such instructions and circulars prohibiting the co-operative societies to make any appointment. ..... others (supra) the supreme court held that the power of review available to the administrative tribunal is the same as has been given to a court under section 114 read with order 47, cpc and is not absolute and is hedged in by the restrictions indicated in order 47, cpc. the restrictions on power of ..... department in annexure-1 series to the review petition are statutory instructions issued by the government in exercise of its power under sections 33-a and 123-a of the orissa co-operative societies act and appointment of smt. basanti swain, the writ petitioner contrary to the said statutory instructions/circulars were illegal and hence, no .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 04 2003 (HC)

Samir Francis and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-04-2003

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2923; II(2004)DMC159

..... and decided in favour of the informant with reasons and, therefore, there is no justification for this court to reconsider the same question again in exercise of the powers under section 482, cr. p.c.4. shri mohanty, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that a bare reading of the f.i.r. and the statements of the ..... dowry at the above places. accordingly, on the basis of such allegations the case was registered for commission of offences under sections 498-a, 406 and 34 of the penal code read with section 4 of the dowry prohibition act. on completion of investigation, charge-sheet was submitted for commission of the offences mentioned above and in the impugned order charge ..... learned j.m.f.c., baripada in g.r. case no. 214 of 1999 framing charge for commission of offences under sections 498-a, 406 and 34 of the penal code read with sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act.2. petitioner no. 1 is the husband of the informant, puja shaw. the f.i.r. has been lodged on .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 04 2003 (HC)

Smt. Mamata Manjari Sanibigraha Vs. Sri Debendra Prasad Sanibigraha

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-04-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR536

..... civil revision petition.3. petitioner is the respondent and the opposite party is the applicant in title suit no. 750 of 2001 instituted for the relief under section 9 of the hindu marriage act, 1955. that suit has been instituted and pending in the court of civil judge (senior division), balasore. inter se relationship between the petitioner and the ..... the petitioner is a young woman aged 25 years and she is to be accompanied by a child aged about two years. notwithstanding the fact that section 19 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 allows the option to the applicant to institute the suit at any of the three places enumerated therein and the court at balasore has the local ..... jurisdiction to decide the issue but at the same time section 24 of the code authorises the court to pass order of transfer of the suit appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 09 2003 (HC)

Rasid Khan, (Dead) and After Him Khairan Bibi and ors. Vs. Abdul Gaffa ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-09-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR559

..... such deed of conveyances were created in favour of mir kefayat his name found place in the r.o.r. in ext.3 which suggest that such sale deeds were acted upon accordingly the name of the purchaser was recorded in the r.o.r. the purchaser mir kefayat again sold the property to dhuma under the sale deed dated 29 .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 10 2003 (HC)

Lingaraj Oil Industries Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director, Bab ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR550

..... the facts of the present; case are different than that of the decision referred to above, the principle laid down by the apex court while interpreting section 20-a of the act fully apply to the present case. there being no other evidence available on record at this stage except the statement of the co-accused. i am ..... availability of evidence to show that the adulteration had taken place at the hands of the manufacturer. in support of his contention, the learned counsel referred to section 20-a of the act and also relied upon a decision of the apex court in the case of m/s. omprakash shivprakash v. k.i. kuriakose and ors. reported in ..... . after the learned magistrate took cognizance of the said offence, an application was filed by the petitioner for reconsideration of the order taking cognizance referring to section 20-a of the act.3. shri pujari, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the learned magistrate could not have taken cognizance of the offence so far as .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 10 2003 (HC)

Purusottam Pradhan Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR547

..... order dated 23.7.2002 passed by the learned 1st additional sessions judge, berhampur in s.c. no. 26 of 1999 rejecting the petition filed by the accused-petitioner under section 311 of the code of criminal procedure to summon the revenue inspector, kelua for the purpose of production of village settlement map. r.o.r. etc.2. from the impugned ..... is the i.o. was examined, cross-examined and evidence from the side of the prosecution was closed. on , the said date a petition was filed by the petitioner under section 311 of the code of criminal procedure to summon the revenue inspector, kelua to cause production of the village settlement map of village gothagam, khatian and r.o.r. of .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 15 2003 (HC)

Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gayadhar Poi and ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-15-2003

Reported in : 96(2003)CLT37

pradip mohanty, j.1. this appeal is one under section 173(1) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') against the order dated 19.9.1996 passed by the 3rd motor accidents claims tribunal, balasore, in m.a.c.t. case no. 38/106 (c) of 1996/94.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 17 2003 (HC)

Smt. Santa Kumari Das and anr. Vs. the Judge, Family Court and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-17-2003

Reported in : 2003(II)OLR18

..... 2 commenced the aforesaid civil proceeding no. 262 of 1996 in the court of learned judge, family court, cuttack by a petition under section 22 of the indian divorce act, 1869 read with section 7 of the family courts act, 1984 for a decree of divorce against petitioner no. 1 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.3. admittedly, the parties belong ..... . 2) were born who are now grown-up. the son is married and is carrying on business. opposite party no. 2 in his petition under section 22 of the indian divorce act, 1869 alleged that petitioner no. 1 with the help of their major son and daughter tried to kick him out.of the house. she started misbehaving with ..... the present case is a case covered under the principal act. the principal act has come to be amended by the indian divorce (amendment) act, 2001 (act 51 of 2001) which has come into force with effect from 3.10.2001 by virtue of which sections 17 and 20 of the principal act stand amended dispensing with the provision of confirmation of the .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 18 2003 (HC)

Ganesh SwaIn Vs. Sabitri SwaIn Alias Sanju and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-18-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR602

..... se dispute, ends of justice and equity demands that an opportunity should be given to the petitioner to examine some of the witnesses in exercise of the power conferred under section 311 cr.p.c. but then, after hearing the counsel. i am satisfied that the courts below have not committed any irregularity in rejecting the petition . filed by ..... thus, the word 'shall' in the second clause is mandatory and imperative in nature and character and the word 'may' in the first clause, is directory. in short, under section 311 of the code, the power of the court to examine a witness for a just decision of the case, cannot be curtailed in any manner or beyond any state ..... 'may' and 'shall' in the same provision which means the legislature did not leave it to the discretion of the court to intrepret both the expressions. reading of the section would lead to a conclusion that at any stage of inquiry, trial or other proceeding if the court so requires, it 'may summon' any person as witness or examine any .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 21 2003 (HC)

Sauki Pradhan and anr. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-21-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR583

..... s.c. 536 (vencil pusparaj v. state of rajasthan). the law is well settled that in order to bring an accused under the purview of section 34 i.p.c. he must have acted in concert or there was existence of pre-arranged plan to commit murder of the deceased in order that common intention on the part of the accused ..... that of appellant sauki. we are fully convinced that case of appellant gangadhar is not at all different from that of appellant sauki. as such, act of gangadhar can be brought within the purview of section 34 of the indian penal code for having common intention withappellant sauki in stabbing the deceased. as such, the contention of the appellants, counsel having ..... . to him. appellant sauki stands in a different footing from that of appellant gangadhar. in such a view of the matter he has urged that act of appellant gangadhar cannot be brought within hie purview of section 34 of indian penal code.21. relying on 1988 (1) o.l.r. 626 (tunu puturi and ors. v. state of orissa) appellants .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //