Array ( [0] => [1] => ..... corpus petition filed by the petitioner for quashing the order of detention dated 10.10.2002 passed by the district magistrate, nayagarh under sub-section (2) of section 3 of the national security act, 1980 (for short 'act, 1980)'.2. the brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this writ application are that the petitioner had been arrested and ..... 354, 307, 302, 109, 139, ipc/25/27 arms act and khandapara p.s. case no. 63 dated 11.9.2002 under sections 341, 294, 353, 506, 307, 34, ipc/25/27 arms act. while he was in custody, the impugned order of detention dated ..... was in intermediary judicial custody in dasapalla sub- jail in connection with khandapara p.s. case no. 123 dated 1.12.2001 under sections 147, 148, 323, 326, ..... [2] => ..... filed by the petitioner for quashing the order of detention dated 9.5. 2002 passed by the district magistrate, kendrapara under sub- section (2) of section 3 of the national security act, 1980 (for short, 'the act 1980').2. the brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this writ petition are that the petitioner was arrested in connection ..... to their heals in the cover of darkness. on the report of iic kendrapara p.s. case no. 30. dt. 6.2.2002, under section 399/402 ipc/25(a)/27 arms act was registered and investigated into. on completion of investigation, charge sheet was placed against you and 8 others. the case is subjudice:the above incidents clearly ..... with kendrapara p.s. case no. 30 of 2002 on 6.2.2002. the offences alleged against the petitioner were under sections 399/402, i.p.c./25 (a)/27 arms act. the petitioner was thereafter forwarded to the jail custody. while the petitioner was in jail custody in choudwar jail, the impugned order of detention ..... [3] => ..... . it is the settled principle of law that if the point of limitation is not raised before the lower court, the same can be agitated in appeal. section 3 of the limitation act lays down that a suit or a proceeding instituted after the expiry period of limitation 'shall be dismissed although limitation has not been set as a defence'. the ..... , it appears that the main thrust of the arguments of the appellant is, whether the suits are simple money suits or mortgage suits. article 47 of the indian limitation act provides for three years for a simple money suit which is to be counted from the date of failure to pay the amount, but article 62 of the said ..... section is mandatory and has to be strictly followed. the court has no choice in the matter. in this connection it is noted that the principle laid down by ..... [4] => ..... committee has a right to give his independent, unbiased and considered opinion in respect of each candidate appearing before the committee. normally, it would not be considered a bona fide act on the part of a member of the selection committee to say after the selection is over and he has signed the proceedings, that he 'overlooked' certain qualifications in respect ..... [5] => ..... to that extent the law made by the state legislature shall not be enforceable. therefore, on a comparison of section 115, c.p.c. after the aforesaid amendment in the year 1999 and the orissa amendment act of section 115 which has been made in the year 1991, this court finds that though the orissa amendment is enforceable ..... already done or suffered, or any jurisdiction already exercised, and any proceeding instituted or commenced in the high court under section 115 of the code of civil procedure, 5 of 1908, prior to the commencement of this act shall, notwithstanding such amendment, continue to be heard and decided by such court.' 6. it be borne in ..... ) has taken effect, and without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of section 6 of the general clauses act, 1897.-- (a) to (h) .. ..(i) the provisions of section 115 of the principal act, as amended by section 12 of this act, shall not apply to or affect any proceeding for revision which had been finally disposed of.(j) to (v) .. .. ..... [6] => [7] => ..... party in possession of the property on the assertion of a valid right.9. for the reasons indicated above, this court finds no merit in the application under section 115. cpc nor in the application filed today so as to interfere with the impugned orders or to grant temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiffs to restrain ..... 2. plaintiffs in title suit no. 688/678 of 2001/1999 of the court of civil judge (jr. division), bhubaneswar have filed this civil revision petition under section 115, cpc challenging to legality and correctness of the order passed on 29.6.2002 by the said civil judge and the confirming order passed by learned addl. ..... appellant. apart from that, in the above context, the revisional court can also exercise jurisdiction under section 115(1), cpc if the court finds that the court below having jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute and while so adjudicating such dispute acted illegally or with material irregularity. in the case at hand, this court does not find any such ..... [8] => [9] => ..... a balance between the two and not sacrificing one at the altar of the other. therefore, it may be proper to consider whether proviso (b) to section 115 of the code introduced by act 104 of 1976 should not be restored.8. i allow the revision. the order of the court below is set aside. the application for amendment will stand ..... that the order of the court below requires to be interfered with.7. before parting with this case, i may observe that proviso (b) to section 115 of the civil procedure code introduced by amending act 104 of 1976 served a salutary purpose. it enabled the revisional court to interfere with an order if the order challenged, if allowed to stand, was ..... on by the learned counsel is more in point. therein, the effect of the amendment has been discussed. a literal reading of the proviso to section 115 of the code as it reads after amending act 22 of 2002, and the indication available by the dropping of clause (b) of the proviso to the effect that interference was possible in ..... ) Explosives Act 1884 Section 4 Definitions - Sortby Old - Court Orissa - Year 2003 - Page 2 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: orissa Year: 2003 Page 2 of about 137 results (0.193 seconds)

Jan 27 2003 (HC)

Bidesi Bagarty Vs. Jogendra Sahu and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-27-2003

Reported in : 2003(II)OLR42

B.P. Das, J.1. This miscellaneous appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 10.1.2000 and 20.1.2000 respectively passed by the District Judge, Balangir in Title Appeal No. 25 of 1996. While disposing of the said appeal, the appellate Court set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Balangir in Title Suit No. 65 of 1992 and remitted the suit to the trial Court with the following direction :'To frame an additional issue to the effect whether there was partition between Satya and Baji. and whether in such partition part of the suit land measuring Ac. 0.62 decimals corresponding to 1936 settlement plot No. 582 fell to the share of Baji and to decide the said issue by giving opportunities to the defendants to lead further evidence. The plaintiff shall in no circumstance be allowed to participate in the hearing of the fresh issue. After evidence in the new issue is received, the trial Court is to decide the suit afresh on the basis of the ev...

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 29 2003 (HC)

Bishi Keshan Pradhan Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-29-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR324

..... corpus petition filed by the petitioner for quashing the order of detention dated 10.10.2002 passed by the district magistrate, nayagarh under sub-section (2) of section 3 of the national security act, 1980 (for short 'act, 1980)'.2. the brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this writ application are that the petitioner had been arrested and ..... 354, 307, 302, 109, 139, ipc/25/27 arms act and khandapara p.s. case no. 63 dated 11.9.2002 under sections 341, 294, 353, 506, 307, 34, ipc/25/27 arms act. while he was in custody, the impugned order of detention dated ..... was in intermediary judicial custody in dasapalla sub- jail in connection with khandapara p.s. case no. 123 dated 1.12.2001 under sections 147, 148, 323, 326, .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 29 2003 (HC)

Tito Alias Sayed Usman Ali Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-29-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR350

..... filed by the petitioner for quashing the order of detention dated 9.5. 2002 passed by the district magistrate, kendrapara under sub- section (2) of section 3 of the national security act, 1980 (for short, 'the act 1980').2. the brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this writ petition are that the petitioner was arrested in connection ..... to their heals in the cover of darkness. on the report of iic kendrapara p.s. case no. 30. dt. 6.2.2002, under section 399/402 ipc/25(a)/27 arms act was registered and investigated into. on completion of investigation, charge sheet was placed against you and 8 others. the case is subjudice:the above incidents clearly ..... with kendrapara p.s. case no. 30 of 2002 on 6.2.2002. the offences alleged against the petitioner were under sections 399/402, i.p.c./25 (a)/27 arms act. the petitioner was thereafter forwarded to the jail custody. while the petitioner was in jail custody in choudwar jail, the impugned order of detention .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 04 2003 (HC)

A. Papa Rao and ors. Vs. the Jeypore Sugar Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-04-2003

Reported in : AIR2003Ori146

..... . it is the settled principle of law that if the point of limitation is not raised before the lower court, the same can be agitated in appeal. section 3 of the limitation act lays down that a suit or a proceeding instituted after the expiry period of limitation 'shall be dismissed although limitation has not been set as a defence'. the ..... , it appears that the main thrust of the arguments of the appellant is, whether the suits are simple money suits or mortgage suits. article 47 of the indian limitation act provides for three years for a simple money suit which is to be counted from the date of failure to pay the amount, but article 62 of the said ..... section is mandatory and has to be strictly followed. the court has no choice in the matter. in this connection it is noted that the principle laid down by .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 04 2003 (HC)

Miss Samita Dev Sarkar Vs. Utkal University and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-04-2003

Reported in : 95(2003)CLT416

..... committee has a right to give his independent, unbiased and considered opinion in respect of each candidate appearing before the committee. normally, it would not be considered a bona fide act on the part of a member of the selection committee to say after the selection is over and he has signed the proceedings, that he 'overlooked' certain qualifications in respect .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 11 2003 (HC)

Simplex Engineering and Foundary Works Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bhubaneswar P ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-11-2003

Reported in : AIR2003Ori149; 2003(I)OLR508

..... to that extent the law made by the state legislature shall not be enforceable. therefore, on a comparison of section 115, c.p.c. after the aforesaid amendment in the year 1999 and the orissa amendment act of section 115 which has been made in the year 1991, this court finds that though the orissa amendment is enforceable ..... already done or suffered, or any jurisdiction already exercised, and any proceeding instituted or commenced in the high court under section 115 of the code of civil procedure, 5 of 1908, prior to the commencement of this act shall, notwithstanding such amendment, continue to be heard and decided by such court.' 6. it be borne in ..... ) has taken effect, and without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of section 6 of the general clauses act, 1897.-- (a) to (h) .. ..(i) the provisions of section 115 of the principal act, as amended by section 12 of this act, shall not apply to or affect any proceeding for revision which had been finally disposed of.(j) to (v) .. .. .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 19 2003 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Sahoo Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-19-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR410

B. Panigrahi, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner has questioned about the propriety of the order dated 8.8.2000 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No. 571 of 1999 filed by the opp.party No. 3 against the opp.parties 1 and 2 without impleading the petitioner as a party therein whereby the Tribunal directed to consider the application of opp. party No. 3.2. The opp.parties 1 and 2 issued an advertisement/ notification dated 29.7.1999 inviting application for the post of Extra Departmental Sub-Post Master which was designated as GRAMINA DAK SEVA SUB POST MASTER (hereinafter referred to as 'GDSSPM') at Tulasipur, Banki Sub-Post Office under Cuttack Division. The petitioner offered himself to be a candidate from O.B.C. community and claimed to have secured 64% of marks in Board of Secondary Examination. It appears that opp. party No. 3 filed a case before the Central Administrative Tribunal, being O.A. No. 571 of 1999 wherein he claimed that...

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 21 2003 (HC)

Nandakishore Nayak and Two ors. Vs. State of Orissa and Two ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-21-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR473

..... party in possession of the property on the assertion of a valid right.9. for the reasons indicated above, this court finds no merit in the application under section 115. cpc nor in the application filed today so as to interfere with the impugned orders or to grant temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiffs to restrain ..... 2. plaintiffs in title suit no. 688/678 of 2001/1999 of the court of civil judge (jr. division), bhubaneswar have filed this civil revision petition under section 115, cpc challenging to legality and correctness of the order passed on 29.6.2002 by the said civil judge and the confirming order passed by learned addl. ..... appellant. apart from that, in the above context, the revisional court can also exercise jurisdiction under section 115(1), cpc if the court finds that the court below having jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute and while so adjudicating such dispute acted illegally or with material irregularity. in the case at hand, this court does not find any such .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 24 2003 (HC)

Sri Krushna Chandra Sahoo and 3 ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-24-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR361

ORDER1. Heard Mr. M.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K.C. Kar, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for opp. parties 1 to 4.2. The case of the petitioners are that they are all functioning as Sub-wholesalers in kerosene oil in different places under Marsaghai Block, Kendrapara district as per the details given herein below :-----------------------------------------------------'Name of petitioners Place of Business------------------------------------------------------1. Krushna Ch. Sahoo Bhusaranga 2. Debabrata Swain Marsaghai3. Kunal Kumar Swain Silipur4. Bishnu Ch. Routray Gaudagaon'.------------------------------------------------------3. Under the circulars dated 2.6.1975 of the Government of Orissa, Food, Supplies and Consumer Welfare Department (Annexure-1 to the writ petition), dated 5.2.1980 of the Government of Orissa, Food and Civil Supplies Department (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) and dated 22.9.2000 of the Government, of Orissa, Food, Supplies and Consumer W...

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Smt. Basanti Satapathy and Two ors. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Satapathy

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR516

..... a balance between the two and not sacrificing one at the altar of the other. therefore, it may be proper to consider whether proviso (b) to section 115 of the code introduced by act 104 of 1976 should not be restored.8. i allow the revision. the order of the court below is set aside. the application for amendment will stand ..... that the order of the court below requires to be interfered with.7. before parting with this case, i may observe that proviso (b) to section 115 of the civil procedure code introduced by amending act 104 of 1976 served a salutary purpose. it enabled the revisional court to interfere with an order if the order challenged, if allowed to stand, was ..... on by the learned counsel is more in point. therein, the effect of the amendment has been discussed. a literal reading of the proviso to section 115 of the code as it reads after amending act 22 of 2002, and the indication available by the dropping of clause (b) of the proviso to the effect that interference was possible in .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //