Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: kolkata Year: 2006 Page 10 of about 160 results (0.233 seconds)

Shila Roy Choudhury and ors. Vs. Nimai Charan Rakshit

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN7

..... an agreement to the contrary, such tenancy would be regarded as one from year to year or from month to month in accordance with the provisions of section 116 of the said act.12. in the cases of ganga butt murarka (supra) the supreme court of india observes that of course, there is no prohibition against a landlord ..... ors. v. himatlal jamnadas dani and ors. reported in : [1972]2scr890 , the supreme court of india while explaining the scope of section 116 of the transfer of property act observes that what the section contemplates is that on one side there should be an offer of taking a new lease evidenced by the lessee or sub-lessee remaining in ..... chandra das and ors. reported in : [1961]3scr813 and bhuneshwar prasad and anr. v. united commercial bank and ors. reported in : air2000sc2796 .10. section 116 of the transfer of property act, 1882, runs as under:116. effect of holding over.-if a lessee or under-lessee of property remains in possession thereof after the determination of the lease .....

Anil Lakra and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4467

..... withheld and genesis of the entire prosecution case was withered away due to non-production of general diary and papers of military hospital. adverse presumption under section 114(g) of the evidence act should be drawn against prosecution for non-production of general diary which was the real fir.38. we are not at all convinced with the ..... submission of mr. bagchi that adverse presumption under section 114(g) of the evidence act should be drawn against the prosecution for withholding the general diary which was the real fir and which was the best evidence. the submission of mr ..... identity of all the appellants were well established and it was proved beyond all reasonable doubts that all the appellants in concert of their act forcibly took away the victim from telipara bridge and committed offence under section 376(2)(g) of the i.p.c. the decision in kanan v. state of kerala reported in 1979 scc (cri) .....

Basir Sk., Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN111

..... directly from the victim himself, the learned judge made no mistake either in fact or in law in convicting the appellants under section 302/34 of the ipc and under section 9b(1)(b) of the indian explosives act.16. we have heard and considered submissions of both mr. basu and mr. sengupta and we have also examined the ..... and finding a strong prima facie case against all the five appellants, charge-sheet was submitted against all of them under section 302/34 of the ipc and also under section 9b(1)(b) of the indian explosives act.5. the learned additional sessions judge after framing charges against the appellants on the basis of police papers explained the charges ..... /34 of the ipc and sk. basir and manjur ali were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year each for the offence under section 9b(1)(b) of the indian explosives act.7. mr. basu, appearing in support of the appeal has seriously challenged the conviction order as well as the consequential order of sentence as recorded .....

Sk. Umed Ali Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2005(4)CHN124

..... entire prosecution case is based on circumstantial evidence. there was no direct evidence of murder of sahida bibi by the appellant. the examination of the appellant under section 313 of the code of criminal procedure (hereinafter called the code) was not done properly and all the circumstances that transpired in evidence of the witnesses were ..... suspicion on the voluntary character of the confession. the extra-judicial confession made by the appellant in this case was voluntary and accordingly it can be accepted and acted upon.25. we are also not convinced with the submission of mr. acharya that except the alleged confession there was no material to connect the appellant in ..... appellant. the appellant developed illicit relation with jahanara bibi over which there was dispute in the family and as sahida, the deceased, used to protest against such act of the appellant, the appellant umed used to assault her. p.w. 1 learnt these matters from the deceased as he stated in his evidence. on the .....

The State of West Bengal Vs. Mr. Tarique Akhtar Alias Raja and

Court : Kolkata

..... of the opposite party no. 2, so the local police started a separate case being mango (azadnagar) p.s. case no. 38 dated 01/2/2006 under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substance act. the opposite party no. 2 was also shown arrested in connection with bowbazar p.s. case and the articles were also shown to have been seized in ..... justified. as the matter involves transfer of a case from one state to another state, so the learned chief judicial magistrate, jamshedpur was not authorized to pass such order under section 186(b) cr.p.c. which runs as under:high court to decide, in case of doubt, district where enquiry or trial shall take place: * * * * * * * *(b) if the courts are .....

Smt. Sita Devi Haralalka Vs. T.M. and M.C. Private Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2007)1CALLT107(HC)

..... accept it. here, no witness was examined on behalf of the defendant to deny the tender and refusal to rebut the presumption under section 27 of the general clauses act read with section 114 of the evidence act.16. referring to the evidence of mr. sanjoy haralalka, mr. bhattacharya assailed the notice on the ground that it was given under ..... the original plaintiff sita devi claimed to be owner of the disputed premises, no document in this regard has been produced. the 'landlord' within definition of section 2(d) of the act includes any person who, but for a special contract, would be entitled to receive the rent of any premises on his own account. the person contemplated ..... set aside (annexure 'e'). as the defendant failed to pay or deposit the amount within the stipulated period, the substituted plaintiffs filed an application under section 17(3) of the act which was allowed by this court by order dated 11.01.05 and the defence against delivery of possession was struck out (annexure 'f').7. a .....

Arindam Basu and ors. Vs. Amal Kumar Bose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR2006Cal295,2006(4)CHN813

..... ]1scr176 which dealt with the right of a lessor to resume possession by extra judicial method. we have already pointed out that the principle of section 6 of the specific relief act is applicable only to immovable property and cannot have any application to hire-purchase agreement as referred to in the supreme court decisions mentioned above. ..... except by due process of law even by the lawful owner, the person dispossessed of the immovable property can by simply filing a suit under section 6 of the specific relief act within six months from the date of dispossession, get back possession even he had no title to the property, provided, however, that the dispossession ..... that he was deprived of his property without authority of law.17. in the motor vehicles act itself, the possession by the financier in terms of hire-purchase agreement has been recognized as would appear from section 51(5) of the motor vehicles act. a hirer, so long the entire instalments are not fully paid, without taking 'no .....

Jaymac Lasetron P. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2006)206CTR(Cal)532,[2006]286ITR453(Cal)

..... of the deceased to the extent of inheritance of the estate and for that purpose such legal heir and/or legal representative would be deemed assessee under section 159 of the said act of 1961.application of law in the present scenario18. let us now apply the law in these two cases after analysis of the facts. on ..... the said deceased person competent to inherit the property of the deceased.(xv) sri mohan wahi v. cit : a notice of demand on the assessee under section 156 of the act is mandatory before taking any step for recovery under the second schedule. non-service of a notice goes to the root of the validity of the subsequent proceeding ..... a person who has got valid title legally conveyed to him after complying with the requirement of law such as the transfer of property act, the registration act, etc.(viii) tro v. gangadhar viswanath ranade : section 281 declares any transfer within the mischief period void as against the payment of revenue whereas rule 11 empowers the recovery officer to .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. Anurag Properties Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(1)CHN1

..... case where it was held that if there was an instrumentality or agency of the state which assumed the grab of a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act, it did not follow that it thereby cased to be an instrumentality or agency of the state. for the purpose of article 12, the court ..... suffering a decree of rs. 4838.87p. for refund of wharfage, demurrage and transit charges, a plea was taken that such recovery was barred by section 110 of the madras port trust act. the supreme court in exercise of discretion under article 136 of the constitution decided to revoke the special leave earlier granted on the ground that the ..... learned single judge was dealing with a writ application filed by a licensee under the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971 who complained that although in the year 1982, a notice under section 4 of the act was served, the landlord abandoned the said notice and accepted the rental from the writ petitioner but suddenly, in the .....

Sandhya Mondal and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2007)1CALLT116(HC)

..... kumar mitra, j.1. challenge in this writ petition is the intended acquisition of residential plot with building allegedly for public purposes. in the notification preliminary published under section 4 of act (1) of 1894 the purpose was shown as widening of raja s.c. mullick road at calcutta. the claim of the petitioner here is that his land ..... no. 134, raja s.c. mullick road was requisitioned by kmda allegedly for the purpose of widening of raja s.c. mullick road. admittedly, a notice under section 4 of act i of 1894 was served on a minor boy out of the petitioners/owners.11. it appears from the report of the learned special officer, mr. rabi shankar ..... .2000. thus, the state authorities accepted the ownership of the petitioners.35. in paragraph 5 the state authorities say that declaration of acquisition of land under section 6 of the said act has been notified and the petitioners have also a claim of ownership over premises no. 134 raja s.c. mullick road. the state authorities has stated in .....