Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 7 of about 11,949 results (0.086 seconds)

Shivasubramanyam Vs. State Through Chamarajanagar East Police Station

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1998; 2002(3)KarLJ280

..... of the material made available to me it cannot be said that prima facie petitioner has contravened the provisions of the act. section 9 is not at all available under the explosive substances act. at this stage it is not possible for this court to hold with the materials made available and the subsequent investigation ..... said that a case is made out. petitioner is charged under sections 3, 5, 6 and 9 of explosive substances act. section 3 provides for punishment for causing explosion likely to endanger life or property. section 5 provides for punishment for making or possessing explosives under suspicious circumstances. section 6 provide for punishment for abettors. a prima facie reading ..... in crime no. 192 of 2001 for the offences punishable under sections 114, 212 and 216-a read with section 34 of the indian penal code and under sections 3, 15 and 27 of arms act, 1969 and sections 3, 5, 6 and 9 of the explosive substances act, 1908.4. petitioner was unsuccessful in the bail petition filed .....

B.A. Srinivasa Guptha and ors. Vs. State by Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2002CriLJ4540; ILR2002KAR3185; 2003(2)KarLJ445

..... vicinity of the town hall for which fir was lodged and crime no. 353 of 1994 under sections 143, 147, 148, 332, 353, 324 and 307 read with section 149 of the ipc, section 3(2)(e) of the pdpp act and sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act, was registered; and (ii) in the vicinity of the police station, kuthuparamba in respect of which fir ..... was filed and crime no. 354 of 1994 of kuthuparamba police station under sections 143, 147, 148, 307 and 427 read .....

Mohammed Azamathulla Alias Azzu and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka by Til ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2661; ILR2003KAR1541

..... around the courts for over years to find their cases expeditiously disposed of. the compelling situation activated and prompted the concerned authorities to act swiftly to find out a solution to the problem of docket explosion. in the said context, with a noble object and social purpose under a special scheme, the fast courts have been created. the ..... alone render judgment is not an absolute rule without exception. the code of criminal procedure under different justifiable circumstances permits a departure from its compliance. the provisions of section 407 cr.p.c., empowers this court to transfer the case from one court to another for different reasons and if it is expedient in the ends of ..... in crl.no.929/-01, set aside the order of transfer and restored to the file of ix addl. sessions judge, for disposal on the ground that under section 409 cr.p.c., the sessions judge has no power to transfer the part heard cases from the file of one sessions court to another. subsequently, the impugned .....

H.V. Narayana Rao Vs. A.R. Ravi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004ACJ271

..... prove that the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident was guilty of rash and negligent driving.17. a claim for compensation, whether under section 140 or under section 166 of the act, shall be made by an application. the application shall be in such form and shall contain such particulars as may be prescribed. the form of ..... in each case. the tort of negligence is spread over more and more areas of tortious liability, keeping in tune with the hazards brought about by the automobile explosions and ever-increasing casualties and human pain and suffering arising out of road accidents.27. in the tort of negligence, breach of 'duty' is the chief ingredient ..... stated in column no. 22 and column no. 8 if we consider them conjointly. be that as it may, after the claimant instituted claim petition under section 166 of the act, the respondents fully understanding that the claimant has laid a claim for compensation against them attributing negligence on the part of the respondent no. 1 in .....

Sulochana and ors. Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(2004)ACC534; 2005ACJ849; ILR2003KAR4911

..... passengers travelling in the same. a claim petition for payment of compensation was originally filed by the widow, minor, children and the parents of the deceased under section 166 of the motor vehicles act before the tribunal at bangalore. the said petition was subsequently amended so as to make a claim for compensation on no fault basis in terms of ..... as a result of the over turning of the tanker, the petrol contained in it started leaking and got collected nearby. few hours after the initial accident, an explosion took place in the petrol tanker resulting in a fire causing burn injuries to a number of persons who had gathered there to collect petrol that was leaking from the ..... to the conclusion that even when the tanker in question had turned turtle and could not be moved unless it was once again put back on wheels yet the explosion resulting in injuries to the people who had gathered to collect petrol was an accident arising out of the use of the vehicle. the following passages from the .....

i. Varalakshmi and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corpor ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005ACJ384; ILR2004KAR815

..... should be a causal connection not necessarily a direct and immediate one between the use of the vehicle and the accident causing death or injuries to the claimants. an explosion that takes place hours after the vehicle has turned turtle or a case where the passengers in autorickshaw commit a crime by looting and killing the driver have thus ..... nearby. the court also rejected the contention that after the collision since the tanker had turned turtle, it had ceased to be a motor vehicle so that any explosion on account of the petrol leaking from the tanker could not be said to be an accident arising out of the use of such a vehicle. the petrol tanker ..... the supreme court in minu b. mehta v. balakrishna ramachandra nayan 1977 acj 118 holds the field making proof of fault essential in cases of fault under section 166 of the motor vehicles act. in kaushnuma begum's case supra, the apex court has no doubt borrowed and applied the rule of strict liability as propounded in rylanda v. fletcher .....

Mvr Gas Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2006]144STC446(Kar)

..... term 'manufacture of gas' in the gas cylinders rules, 1981 and the definition of 'manufacture' in the indian explosives act, 1884 were not considered by the authority.5.1 the explosives act, 1884 was enacted to regulate the manufacture, possession, use, sale, transport, import and export of explosives. section 17 enables the central government to declare any substance which appears to it to be specially dangerous to life ..... and property, by reason either of its explosive properties or of any process in the manufacture thereof being liable to .....

Sridhar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4813; 2004(7)KarLJ518

..... entitled to look into a mahazar for refreshing his memory.2. in the trial of the petitioner for offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 307 read with 120b ipc and sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act, rw. 6-narayanappa, former police inspector, banasawadi police station, bangalore city, was examined on 29.11.2002 to ..... of the same had been recognised by him, so that he is sure of the correctness of the facts stated therein. therefore, conditions required under section 159 of the evidence act to permit this witness to refresh his memory by referring to the contents of the mahazar had not been satisfied and the learned sessions judge was not ..... is not entitled to look into the mahazar prepared not under his supervision, but under the supervision of some other police officer. he read out section 159 of the evidence act and submitted that the said witness being neither signatory to the mahazar nor the person who wrote the mahazar, he has no right to refresh his .....

Chikkusappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ64

..... manner in the mining or quarrying operations carried on by the petitioners, except to the extent of compliance with the other applicable laws such as explosives act, 1884 or mining act provided for and accordingly issued the directions.42. it is in this context, this court also opined - 'that in the present state of law ..... in the present cases, before issue of mineral dispatch permits and if the applicant had not so obtained the permission contemplated under sub-section (2) of section 95 of the act, mineral dispatch permit will be issued only after the applicant obtains such permission.39. the petitioners have sought for quashing of these endorsement ..... agricultural activity amounting to diversion from agricultural purpose; that therefore such activity when it amounts to diversion clearly attracts the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 95 of the act and if a statutory authority while considering the application filed under rule 42 of the mineral concession rules on being made aware of .....

The State by the Psi of Bhatkal Town Police Station Vs. Karim M. S/O M ...

Court : Karnataka

..... , therefore the prosecution has successfully proved the guilt of possession of the country bombs by all the accused persons. the accused are convicted under section 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 r/w section 34 ipc. the accused are sentenced to r.i. for a period of two years each and to pay a fine of rs. 20,000/- each in default to ..... investigation, the charge sheet is filed. the trial court finds that there were five inmates and only 3 bombs were found hence comes to the conclusion that conscious possession of explosives by the accused is not proved and acquitted them.4. the evidence of p.w.1 the panch witness and the evidence of pws. 2 to 5 who were the ..... k. sreedhar rao, j.1. a.1 to a.5 were charged for offence under section 5 of the explosive substances act 1908. the facts of the prosecution disclose that on 10-11-1997 at 7-30 p.m. a1 is the driver of the jeep bearing no. kl-11/c-5925, .....