Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 11,949 results (0.129 seconds)

United India Fire and General Insurance Co. Vs. Azeerunnisa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... will become statutory and binding on all the insurers to the extent mentioned in the section. 8. our attention was invited to the indian motor tariffs issued by the tariff advisory committee in 1973 thereunder regulating the terms and conditions as also ..... is satisfied that such insurer generally issues policies only to a restricted class of the public or under a restricted category of risks.' 7. sub-section (2) of that section speaks of fixing, amending or modifying any rates, advantages, terms or conditions relating to any risk thus, the rates fixed by the advisory committee ..... ) also covers loss of or damage to vehicle caused by accidental external means like fire, external explosion, self-ignition, lightning, burglary, house breaking (theft of accessories is not covered unless such motor vehicle is stolen at the same time), malicious act and whilst in transit by road, rail, inland waterways, lift or elevator. the rates are .....

Balappa Mallappa Dambal Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1981Kant251; 1981(2)KarLJ174

..... fertilizers enumerated comes within the scope and meaning of that item. by the use of the word components the legislature has brought within that entry all chemical explosives and combustibles which are used in preparing fire-works and allied products. when the petitioner is not a licensee to store fire-works and its components or ..... could be levied on fertilizers only if they are subject to such levy of octroi in terms of item 43 of class ix of the second schedule to the act.3. though the state has entered appearance, it is not the contesting respondent therefore, the learned government pleader appearing for the state has made no serious attempt ..... the state of karnataka, 1st respondent herein accorded sanction to the 2nd respondent-chinked town municipal council to levy octroi on goods specified in second schedule to the act. the petitioner deals in different chemical fertilizers enumerated above and has been subjected to levy of octroi duty on sodium nitrate at 2 per cent ad valorem, the .....

United India Fire and General Insurance Co. Vs. Azeerunnisa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1982Kant187; [1983]54CompCas399(Kar); ILR1981KAR1549; 1982(1)KarLJ91

..... the supreme court that it is open to the insurance company to settle the terms of the contract and to cover liability more extensively than is contemplated under section 95 of the motor vehicles act, 1939 vide : air1971sc1624 . hence it would be necessary to resolve the dispute by looking into the terms of the policy. ini the instant cases, the policy is ..... under item no. (ii) also covers loss of or damage to vehicle caused by accidental external means fire, external explosion, self-ignition, lightning, burglary, housebreaking (theft of accessories is not covered unless such motor vehicle is stolen at the same time) malicious act and whilst in transit by road, rail, inland waterways, lift or elevator. the rates are tariffied.' thus it becomes .....

Management of theatre Sanjaya Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1984KAR539; (1984)IILLJ400Kant

..... , which gave unfettered discretion to the minister to refer or not to refer a complaint to the committee appointed by him to go into certain questions under the said section of that act came up for consideration. the supreme court quoted with approval the speech of lord upjohn as follows : my lords, i believe that the introduction of the adjective ' ..... i.c. 910, andhra pradesh high court in sri krishna jute mills v. government of andhra pradesh [1977-ii l.l.j. 363], the allahabad high court in indian explosive ltd's case (supra), the travancore-cochin high court in nagalinga nadar sons v. a.t.h.l.c.w.u. a.i.r. 1951 travancore-cochin 203, have all ..... the rent tribunal after a hearing of the contentions on either side and was not made by the local authority. a division bench of the allahabad high court in indian explosive ltd. (fertiliser division) panki, kanpur v. state of uttar pradesh and others (supra) referred to this case and two other cases viz, norwest holst ltd. v. secretary of .....

Srinivasa Traders and ors. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Chintamani Circ ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR1179; [1985]58STC343(Kar)

..... proof of authority, consent, lawful excuse, etc., upon the defendant. instances of this have already been cited. further examples are the explosive substances act, 1883, s. 4; coinage offences act, 1936, ss.6(1), 7(1), 8, 9, 10; food and drugs act, 1955, ss. 6, 115. it is now usual to find a provision, as to statutory offences, that where a body ..... the benefit of any exemption under the statute is alone on the assessee. i do not think that such a construction can be placed on sub-section (2) of section 6-a. sub-section (2) of section 6-a clearly states that in the absence of any acceptable evidence adduced on behalf of the dealer who is liable to pay tax on the ..... ) only provides for the mode of proof and the consequences flowing from such failure only. from this it follows that we cannot hold that section 6-a(2) of the act contravenes section 15 of the c.s.t. act. we are, therefore, of the view that the ratio in bhavani cotton mills limited's case : [1967]3scr577 does not really bear on .....

T.S. Kotagi Vs. Tahsildar, Gadag and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1985Kant265

..... debt in this context has the effect of wiping out the debt. the dictionary meaning of 'discharge' is -'to free from or relieve of a charge of any kind (burden, explosive, electricity, liability, accusation etc) : to be free : to acquit : to dismiss: to fire (as a gun) : to take the superincumbent weight from : to set down or ..... articles as collateral security. the right to sue, on the debt, assumes that he is in a position to redeliver the goods on payment of debt. the section does not contemplate any notice prior to the institution of the suit. the pledgee can also bring a suit to sell the goods pledged. however a suit to ..... of debtors, namely -1. landless agricultural labourer;2. small farmer; and3. man belonging to weaker section of people.the tahsildar has treated him as a person belonging to 'weaker section of people', the term as defined in the act requires 'weaker sections of the people means persons not being small farmers or landless agricultural labourers, whose annual income from .....

The Cashew Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1803; [1986]63STC90(Kar)

..... unless the parliament in unambiguous terms makes the provision retrospective and takes away the rights vested in or the liabilities incurred by the parties. section 2(ab) inserted by the amending act - act 103 of 1976, which has given a new and restricted meaning to the expression 'customs frontiers of india' is only prospective and is ..... ]2scr619 . 20. but the cases before us are distinguishable both on facts and the questions that arose for consideration in khosla's case : [1966]3scr352 and indian explosives limited's case : 1985(22)elt331(sc) . the licence in these cases before us was issued in the name of the corporation with an express condition that the ..... with the foreign suppliers by the corporation and not by the contract of sale by the corporation with the allottees. khosla's case : [1966]3scr352 and indian explosives ltd.'s case : 1985(22)elt331(sc) are therefore distinguishable and are of no assistance to the corporation. 21. the question whether an assessee was not liable .....

P. Keshava Adiga Vs. Additional District Magistrate

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1987Kant246; 1987(1)KarLJ129

..... small place of 20 x 20 meters in about 1/5th of an acre of land and therefore would not pose a fire hazard. similarly, the deputy chief controller of explosives, madras, has himself to inspect the premises to satisfy himself over that question, particularly its location on the sea. its in that connection he has granted the 'no objection certificate ..... the petroleum rules.5. what has been granted is only 'no objection certificate' in regard to the site. the licence is to be granted by the deputy chief controller of explosives in regard to the outlet. that has not taken place. i therefore do not think that it is a fit case in which this court should interfere merely on the ..... . 226 the setting up of a new rice-mill by another even if such setting up be in contravention of s. 8(3)(c) of the rice milling industry (regulation) act, 1958.6. having regard to this position in law, this petition is not maintainable and therefore it is rejected.7. petition dismissed. .....

irappa @ Veerappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR3793; 1987(3)KarLJ536

..... at all then at most the possession of y was on behalf of k. hence y could not be convicted under section 19(f) nor k under section 21.'the learned authors sri gaur and sri saxena in law of arms and explosives, 4th edition, has stated at page 66, as-'in my judgment possession aft a test or an element of a ..... according to him, the carrying of the gun by the accused and the sudden going off of the bullet from that gun amounted to a rash or negligent act within the meaning of section 304a ipc. the question whether the accused's conduct amounted to culpable rashness or negligence depends directly on the question as to what is the amount of care ..... with cartridges or bullets. therefore, it cannot be said that the accused held the gun with any rashness or negligence and the circumstances do not show that he did any act without proper care and caution. therefore, the material on record does not also indicate that the accused was guilty of rashness or negligence in the matter. therefore, even the .....

Assam Bengal Roadways Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1988Kant157; 1987(3)KarLJ172

..... the consignor or the consignee;(g) natural deterioration or wastage in bulk or weight due to inherent defect, quality or vice of the goods;(h) latent defects.(i) fire, explosion or any 'unforeseen risk;provided that even where such 1oss, destruction, damage, deterioration or non delivery is' proved to have arisen from any one or, more of the aforesaid ..... the carrier, his servants or agents.'the impact of s. 9 is quite clear. it relieves the plaintiff from proving the negligence or the criminal act, referred in section 8. sections 8 and 9 are to be read together. if so read, the burden of showing that the loss or damage that was caused to the property, was not owing ..... respect of, these non-scheduled goods can 'be limited by the common carrier by entering into a special contract with the owner of those goods.9. section 8 overrides the earlier provisions (sections 1 to 7). it declares that the common carrier shall be liable to the owner for loss of or damage to any property delivered to it to .....