Court : Chennai
..... ground case [ie] uthanappalli police station cr.no.143/2012, u/s.147, 148, 341, 120[b], 307, 302 ipc r/w 24[1][b] arms act and 5 of explosive substance act, before appropriate courts. if he comes out on bail, he will indulge in further activities, which will be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order............." a reading of ..... ground case [ie] uthanappalli police station cr.no.143/2012, u/s.147, 148, 341, 120[b], 307, 302 ipc r/w 24[1][b] arms act and 5 of explosive substance act, before appropriate courts. if he comes out on bail, he will indulge in further activities, which will be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order............." hcp.no. ..... ground case [ie] uthanappalli police station cr.no.143/2012, u/s.147, 148, 341, 120[b], 307, 302 ipc r/w 24[1][b] arms act and 5 of explosive substance act, before appropriate courts. if he comes out on bail, he will indulge in further activities, which will be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order............." hcp.no.2232 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... for the petitioner referred to the order dated 07.11.2007 passed by the learned district collector / district magistrate, villupuram district, ordering enquiry under section 9 of explosives act with regard to the accident.5. learned district collector and district magistrate, villupuram district had appointed sub-divisional executive magistrate / district revenue officer to ..... executive magistrate / district revenue officer in pursuance to the direction issued by the learned district collector / district magistrate, under section 9(1)(a) of explosive act.8. no costs. ar to the sub divisional executive magistrate and district revenue officer villupuram ..... passed by the sub-divisional executive magistrate / district revenue officer, whereas the competent authority to cancel the license is the district authority, which is defined under the explosive rules, 1983, as under: "(7-a) "district authority" means- (a) in towns having a commissioner of police, the commissioner or a deputy commissioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... vehicle, but the said connection need not be direct and immediate. the expression "arising out of use of motor vehicle" as mentioned in section 92-a of the 1939 act and section 165 of 1988 act enlarges the field of protection made available to the victims of an accident and is in consonance with the beneficial object underlying the enactment. ..... the findings of the learned single judge against which the matter came up before the supreme court. the supreme court dismissed the special leave petition holding that the explosion and fire resulting in injuries and death was due to the accident arising out of the use of the motor vehicle. the findings of the supreme court ..... burn injuries and few of them succumbed to the injuries. the victims filed the claim petitions which were dismissed by the claims tribunal on the ground that the explosion and the fire had no connection with the accident, and was altogether an independent accident. the appeal was allowed by the learned single judge of the high .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... to the rescue of the petitioner. v. rule making power:46. the next contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that under section 5 of the explosives act, 1884, the rule making power vests only with the central government and that therefore, the state government is not competent to lay rules.47. the above ..... only generalists and not specialists; (iv) the impugned amendment has not been laid before the state legislature as mandated by section 115 of the factories act, 1948; and (v) that under section 5 of the explosives act, 1884, the rule making power vests only with the central government and hence the state government is not competent to lay the ..... such an extent as to be likely to explode on ignition.23. though the expression "explosives" is not defined in the factories act, 1948, it is defined in section 4 (d) of the explosives act, 1884. this act was already in force, when the factories act, 1948 was enacted. therefore, the normal meaning to be assigned to the expression, is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... to the rescue of the petitioner. v. rule making power:46. the next contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that under section 5 of the explosives act, 1884, the rule making power vests only with the central government and that therefore, the state government is not competent to lay rules.47. the above ..... only generalists and not specialists; (iv) the impugned amendment has not been laid before the state legislature as mandated by section 115 of the factories act, 1948; and (v) that under section 5 of the explosives act, 1884, the rule making power vests only with the central government and hence the state government is not competent to lay the ..... such an extent as to be likely to explode on ignition.23. though the expression "explosives" is not defined in the factories act, 1948, it is defined in section 4 (d) of the explosives act, 1884. this act was already in force, when the factories act, 1948 was enacted. therefore, the normal meaning to be assigned to the expression, is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... that this court has also held in similar circumstances that when the members of the petitioner union and the respondent management had already reached a settlement under section 18(1) of the act and agreed that all the employees would get a minimum bonus and also ex-gratia amount, subsequently it is not open to the management to go ..... : mr.r.rajaram for respondent : mr.m.a.abdulwahab o r d e r this writ petition was filed by k.mallikesan, convener of tamil nadu industrial explosive ltd., employees progressive union (affiliated to lpf), vellore challenging the correctness of the impugned order passed by the respondent-general manager (works), tamil nadu industrial ..... explosive ltd., tel post, vellor 059. in vz; gj/16/04/2005 dated 16.02.2005 by which the respondent sought to recover the advance amount of rs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... negative. hence, the petition is allowed quashing fir in crime no.17 of 2010 of talupula police station, anantapur district relating to offence under section 9b of the explosives act, 1884.7. this court, with the assistance of the learned counsel for the petitioner has assessed the present value of the property at rs.1 lakh ..... ammonium nitrate are advised to initiate necessary action for compliance of ammonium nitrate rules. non-compliance of ammonium nitrate rules will attract strict action under the explosives act, 1884 and ammonium nitrate rules, 2012. action taken report may be submitte to this office.4. hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that ..... than 45% of an by weight including emulsions, suspensions, melts or gols (with or without inorganic nitrates) shall be deemed to be an explosive within the meaning of explosives act, 1884. copy of the said notification is made available in the peso's website under news events for the information of all concerned. copy of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... guilty under a charge of section 4(b) of explosive substances act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years; he was also fund ..... 212, 302, 307, 353, 449, 465 and 471 ipc, sections 3, 4(b), 5 and 6 of the explosive substances act, section 3 read with 25(1-b)(a) of the arms act and section 3(i) and 4 of the tamil nadu property (prevention of damage and loss) act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 13 years; for another charge ..... imprisonment for three years; he was also found guilty under a charge of section 307 ipc (three counts) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years; he was also found guilty under a charge of section 3 of the explosive substances act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for nine years; he was also found .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... .2009, petitioners' son irulaiya travelled as a passenger in the state owned transport corporation bus. three persons thrown petrol bombs into the bus. in the bomb explosion, respondents' son was seriously wounded and subsequently, on 23.5.2009 he breathed his last at the hospital. in his counter, the fifth appellant/inspector of ..... the government hospital. in connection with this untoward incident, the police registered a case in crime no.216 of 2009 under section 3(1) of tnppdl act. on 23.5.2009, irulaiya succumbed to the injuries. thus, sections 323, 324 and 302 ipc were also added. in the course of investigation, siruthai selvam @ selvakumar, jeyaraj and ..... granted compensation.12. the notable decisions on this aspect of law are rudul sah vs. state of bihar [1983 (3) scr508: air1983sc1086; sebastian m. homgray vs. union of india [1884 (1) scc339:1984. (1) scr904: air1984sc571 sebastian m. hongray vs. union of india [1984 (3) scc82:1984. (3) scr544: air1984sc1026; bhim singh vs. state of j .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... of declaration declaring the proceeding of the first respondent in tender noice no.90/fs/2013 dated 5.9.2013, is illegal and contrary to the provision of explosives act, 1884 and explosives rules, 2008 and the judgment of this court in w.p.no.38180/2005 dated 29.9.2006. w.p.no.26447/2013 filed under article 226 of ..... the petitioners' association will definitely be blamed and from the safety angle also, and putting up of shops selling food items and garments, is in gross violation of explosives act and rules framed thereunder and in the event of any mishap, no adequate escape route is available. 18.lastly, it is the submission of the learned senior counsel ..... and the common counter affidavit filed in all the writ petitions, and would submit that the impugned tender notification is in full compliance of the provisions of the explosives act and the rules framed thereunder and also the judgment of this court passed in w.p.no.38180/2005. it is further submitted by the learned additional advocate .....
Tag this Judgment!