Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: chennai Page 18 of about 17,128 results (0.968 seconds)

C.V. Karunakaran Vs. the Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009(171)LC254(Madras); 2010(249)ELT324(Mad)

..... export promotion schemes;(n) offences under the act;(o) the provisions of allied acts including the foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 1992 (22 of 1992), the central excise act, 1944 (1 of 1944), foreign exchange management act, 2000 (42 of 1999), the indian explosives act, 1884 (4 of 1884), the arms act, 1959 (54 of 1959), the narcotics ..... of the same, preamble in customs house agents licensing regulations, 2004, is extracted hereunder:in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 146 of the customs act, 1962 (52 of 1962), and in supersession of the customs house agents licensing regulations, 1984, except as respect things done or ..... the following regulations.23. as stated in paragraph 11 above, these regulations to issue customs house agents licence are framed under section 146(2) of the customs act, 1962. section 159a of the customs act, 1962, also deals with the effect of amendment, etc., on rules, regulations, notifications or orders, which reads as .....

Dr. Fredrick John and Another Vs. A. Rajagam @ Velusamy, Sivaganga and ...

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

..... obstetrical catastrophes, as seen from the book principles of internal medicine by harrison, where we find disseminated intravascular coagulation [dic] can be either an explosive and life-threatening bleeding disorder or a relatively mild or subclinical disorder. although there is a long list of diseases complicated by dic, it is ..... have not applied the reasonable skill and professional standard. all the above allegations are only general accusation, and not with reference any specific incidents, or act, pointing out, how and at what point of time, the standard medical care available for treating the patient was deviated or offended, thereby, causing problems ..... skill required in giving care to the patient and they never shirked their responsibility while rendering service, and therefore there is no question of negligent act or deficiency in service. the claim of the complainants, for compensation is based upon untenable allegations. the other allegations in the complaint are denied as .....

Nallappa Gopalswamy and R.V. Prasanna Venkatesan S. Ganapathy Vs. Stat ...

Court : Chennai

..... would be the report of the director of finger print bureau which may be read as evidence. the government examiner would not be a person whose report can be acted upon under section 293 cr.p.c. evenso, this lapse of the prosecution would not aid the first accused/appellant in c.a. no. 43/2004 given the overwhelming evidence against him ..... is conversant with the facts of the case and can satisfactorily depose in court on his behalf.(4) this section applies to the following government scientific experts, namely, (a) any chemical examiner or assistant chemical examiner to government;(b) the chief controller of explosives;](c) the director of the finger print bureau;(d) the director, haffkeive institute, bombay;(e) the director[deputy .....

Rajamanickam, Vs. the District Collector and District Magistrate, I/C ...

Court : Chennai

..... case in crime no. 470 of 2009 registered by guduvanchery police station for the offences under sections 147, 148, 324, 302 of the indian penal code read with sections 3 and 5 of indian explosive substances act, 1908 and section 3(i) of tnppdl act and on scrutiny of the materials available, the detaining authority, after recording its subjective satisfaction that ..... case in crime no. 470 of 2009 registered by guduvanchery police station for the offences under sections 147, 148, 324, 302 of the indian penal code read with sections 3 and 5 of indian explosive substances act, 1908 and section 3(i) of tnppdl act and the detenu in h.c.p. no. 1811 of 2010 is involved in one adverse ..... case in crime no.470 of 2009 registered by guduvanchery police station for the offences under sections 147, 148, 324, 302 of the indian penal code read with sections 3 and 5 of indian explosive substances act, 1908 and section 3(i) of tnppdl act, the detenu in h.c.p. no.1810 of 2010 is involved in one adverse case .....

Baskaran. Vs. the Inspector of Police, and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... released on bail directly from the hospital in crime no. 48 of 2010 on the file of the munneerpallam police station registered for offences under section 25(1)(1-b) @ 27(1) arms act 5(a) of explosive substance act r/w.120(b)ipc even without being produced before the learned magistrate, this court finds that the petitioner did bear several injuries as ..... central prison, puzhal was also arrested on 26.02.2010 in connection with munneerpallam police station crime no. 48 of 2010 under section 25(1)(1-b)(a) and 27(1) arms act 1959 and section 5(a) of explosive substances act 1908 and recorded his confession statements on 07.03.2010 at 8.00 hours.5. it is further submitted that in the course .....

R.Murugamalai. Vs. Union of IndiA.

Court : Chennai

..... underwent by him. thiru.a.b.nagier stated that he was arrested for madurai tirumalai naicker mahal bomb case in the year 1937 and he was convicted under sections 4a and 4b of explosives act for six years. it is also stated that on 23.10.1942, he was again imprisoned under rule 26(5) of defence of india rules and he was .....

S.Kalaivani. Vs. the State Rep. By: Secretary to the Government, and a ...

Court : Chennai

..... recommendations made by the sponsoring authority that the detenu is involved in three adverse cases namely (1) mamallapuram ps cr.no.192/2009 under sections 147, 148, 120(b), 302 ipc r/w 3 & 4 of indian explosive substances act; (2) chunambedu ps cr.no.59/2010 under sections 147, 148, 341 and 302 ipc and (3) chunambedu ps cr.no.60/2010 under ..... sections 147, 148, 294(b), 394, 307 ipc r/w 3 of indian explosive substances act and also in one ground case registered by chunambedu ps cr.no ..... .154/2010 under sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 394, 307 ipc r/w 4 of indian explosive substances act, 1908 for an occurrence that took place on 17 .....

M/S.Sathya Foundations Private, and ors. Vs. Indbank Housing Limited, ...

Court : Chennai

..... and if such pleas urged and tactics adopted by the defaulters solely with a view to delay the recovery process are encouraged, it would lead not only to docket explosion but also to financial crunch in the country. for all the above reasons, there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed ..... of finance, department of economic affairs, banking division has issued a notification prescribing fee to be paid for preferring an appeal against the measures under section 13(4) of the sarfaesi act.5. thereafter, the first respondent once again issued a notification dated 23.9.2007 informing the public that the alleged secured interest created in favour ..... to undermine and defame the goodwill of the petitioners. therefore, the petitioners filed w.p.no.10318 of 2006, challenging the notice issued under section 13(2) of the sarfaesi act. the said writ petition was dismissed by a division bench of this court on 13.12.2006, following the judgment of the honourable apex court .....

Management of Cambodia Mills Vs. the Presiding Officer and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... to natural calamity, and in the case of a mine, such lay-off is due also to fire, flood, excess of inflammable gas or explosion). (2) an application for permission under sub-section (1) shall be made by the employer in the prescribed manner stating clearly the reasons for the intended lay-off and a copy of ..... to obtain permission from the government. also, when the clause 11 of the standing order (certified by the joint commissioner of labour under the industrial employment standing orders act) empowers the petitioners/ management/mills to declare lay-off, then there is no necessity for the petitioners/mills to obtain permission from the government.30. this court ..... declare lay-off, this court is of the view that for commencement or continuance of lay-off, permission through an application as per sub-section (1) of section 25m of the industrial disputes act, lay-off will have to be made by the petitioners/mills within the specified period, but in the instant cases on hand, the petitioners .....

Hari And Company Vs. St. Antony's Traders And Anr.

Court : Chennai

..... any other suit. the arrest of the vessel while in indian waters by an order of the high court concerned, as defined under the merchant shipping act, 1958 [section 3(15)] attracts the jurisdiction of the competent court to proceed with the trial, as in the case of any other suit, as an action ..... of madras is one of them. there has been no legislation affecting the admiralty jurisdiction in india after 1860. section 106 of the government of india act, 1915, section 223 of the government of india act, 1935 and article 225 of the constitution preserved their status and madras high court continues to be a court of ..... claims; or (b) the radioactive properties or a combination of radioactive properties with toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of nuclear fuel or of radioactive products or waste."24. colonial courts of admiralty act, 1890, colonial courts of admiralty (india) act, 1891, international convention for unification of certain rules relating to maritime liens and mortgages at .....