Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 8 of about 205 results (0.383 seconds)

Jan 07 2008 (TRI)

Virender Singh S/O Dharam Pal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... vide order dated 16.05.2007 (annexure a-1).this is the order which has been called in question by the applicant in the present application filed under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985.2. brief facts, as set out in the application, reveal that the applicant was born on 09.09.1977 and attained majority on 09.09. ..... 1995.he was still a minor when he was involved in criminal case pertaining to fir no. 323/95 under section 308/34 ipc police station, najafgarh, new delhi. it ..... said in the impugned order, that the applicant was involved in a heinous crime. that apart, we are surprised to see that how section 308 of ipc would make it a case of heinous crime. section 308 of ipc deals with attempt to commit culpable homicide not amounting to murder and the maximum sentence prescribed for the said offence is seven .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 2008 (TRI)

Smt. Vandana Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... become disabled to undergo the physical test. it was in those circumstances that section 24 of delhi police act was explained and it was observed that the provision is enacted to meet a totally different situation. it does not mean that a police officer shall ..... his home on a motor-cycle after finishing his duties. he claimed that he should be deemed to have suffered injuries while on duty as per section 24 of delhi police act and should be given the same benefit which such of the persons in delhi police are given who have suffered injuries while performing official duties and had ..... vide order dated 28.3.2007 setting aside the non-speaking order dated 10.5.2006 by directing the respondents to consider her case keeping in view section 24 of delhi police act and to pass a reasoned order within a period of two months (page-30).pursuant to aforesaid directions respondents passed a detailed order on 19.6. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2008 (TRI)

Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Ias S/O Shri Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through th ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... to bombay and to delhi in response to the letter of second respondent dated 21.5.1996. as the claim possibly might be barred to be adjudicated under section 21 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, a miscellaneous application has been filed for condonation of delay (ma 1127/2006).2. we had heard the applicant in person. mr. gautam godara, who had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2008 (TRI)

Gulshan Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Raj Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... comes within tribunal's jurisdiction but appellate order has been passed by mtnl. admittedly, mtnl does not come within our jurisdiction as no notification under section 14(2) of administrative tribunals act, 1985 has been issued to bring it within the purview of this tribunal, therefore, in normal course, we could not have decided the case ..... mtnl due to showing of excess consumption of diesel is rs. 18,52,107/2=9,26,053. thus, by his above acts, the said shri gulshan kumar committed grave misconduct, failed to maintain absolute integrity and acted in a manner unbecoming of a government servant, thereby contravening rule 3 (1) (i) & (iii) of the ccs ( ..... gave the scope for misappropriation of government money on account of diesel consumption. thus by his above acts, the said shri gulshan kumar committed grave misconduct, failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty and acted in a manner unbecoming of a government servant, and failed to ensure the integrity and devotion to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2008 (TRI)

Pradeep Kumar S/O Shyam Bihari Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. pradeep kumar, the applicant herein, as per the case set up by him in the present original application filed under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, was appointed as a tabla player/attendant/helper to the music teacher with respondent no. 5 on 1.10.1980. he claims to be a class iv employee. on ..... a tabla player/attendant to the music teacher. government of nct of delhi, directorate of education is said to have issued circular no. de/22/6/6/87/pfc/1815-1884 on 22.3.2000, by which the post of the applicant is duly covered. it is his further case that he has completed far more than three years service and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2008 (TRI)

K.K. Kaushik S/O J.R. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... be framed. the said so is thus stated to be against the rules beyond competence of the authorities, as not admissible under either the provisions of section 19 or section 27 of the act of 1978.5. pursuant to notice issued by this tribunal, respondents have entered appearance and by filing counter reply, contested the cause of the applicant. ..... , production of letter dated 17.11.1968 and its non applicability and/or lack of jurisdiction to deal and deny hra, may be of no consequence.section 19 of the act of 1978 deals with framing of regulations for administration of the police. subject to orders of the administrator, the commissioner of police may make regulations not ..... of the learned counsel that prescription of consequences touching the right of applicant to get hra could not be made by virtue of provisions contained in section 27 of the 1978 act.11. in view of our observations as made above, there would be no need to elaborately discuss the judicial precedents relied upon by the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2008 (TRI)

Vijender Kumar S/O Late G.C. Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. vijender kumar, head clerk in the office of respondents, the applicant herein, has filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, seeking to set aside order dated 23.5.2007 (annexure a-i), whereby, as per the case set up by the applicant, ineligible candidate, namely, shri ram singh, arrayed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2008 (TRI)

Shri Ram Kishan the General Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through, the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... .11.1992 given in ta 570/1996 wherein it was held that cghs is an industry within the meaning of section 2(j) of industrial disputes act. it was also held therein that section 2(c) of industrial disputes (amendment) act, 1982 has not yet been brought into force. this judgment is reported to have been upheld as slp was dismissed ..... the issue, reliance placed by applicants on any judgment given by the tribunal is of no value specially when amendment has been carried out in sub section (j) of section 2 of industrial disputes act, which is evident from the book of g.m. kothari on industrial law fifth edition 2000. in the explanation to sub ..... central government heath scheme employees association informing him as follows: i am also directed to state that section 2 (j) (ii) (b) (2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 stipulates that hospitals and dispensaries are out of the purview of the industrial disputes act, 1947, and hence the notice served by you for agitational programme is not valid.11. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2008 (TRI)

Smt. Santoshi Devi W/O Ex. Const Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... which dismissed on 20.4.2006. it is not the case of the respondents that the present oa is beyond the period of limitation prescribed under section 21 of the administrative tribunals act, from the date of rejection of representation. that apart, as a matter of abundant caution, the applicant has filed ma no. 437/2007 seeking ..... the course of arguments on behalf of the respondents. it is stated that the present application is barred by limitation as per provisions contained in section 21 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. the pleaded and uncontroverted facts reveal that during pendency of the de novo enquiry commenced pursuant to orders passed by this tribunal in oa ..... though under protest. inspr. b. s. rana was appointed as enquiry officer on 15.11.1996 to conduct the enquiry from the defence stage. he, however, acted as a prosecutor when he cross examined the defence witnesses. be that as it may, the enquiry officer found mohinder singh as innocent.he mentioned in his report that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2008 (TRI)

P.D. Sharma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... of natural justice, necessity thereof may be taken away by a statute either expressly or by necessary implication. a declaration contained in a notification issued under section 6 of the act need not contain any reason but such a notification must precede the decision of the appropriate government. when a decision is required to be taken after ..... collector's report and both the parts must be strictly complied with. (vi) ideally, reasons are required to be assigned while passing an order under section 5-a of the act but even if the same is not required to be assigned, reasons for order must exist on the record.the main question that fell for consideration ..... while defending the judgment of the high court, the counsel representing the respondent-land owner, besides others, raised the following points: (iv) section 5-a of the act being the heart of the act gives the citizen to avail of the only opportunity to make submissions both on the public purpose and the suitability of the acquisition in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //