Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 5 of about 205 results (3.063 seconds)

Shri Suresh Kumar S/O. Shri Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... matter, learned counsel has placed reliance upon the decision of the apex court in kunal singh v. union of india and anr. to contend that provision of section 47 of the act ibid prohibit against dispensing with the services of an employee acquiring a disability during his service and provision for shifting him to some other post in case of consequent ..... in this view of the matter, the decision of the apex court in kunal singh's case (supra), apex court took into consideration the very object of section 47 of the act ibid and ruled that in case the disability is incurred outside or within the employment, one must not be shunted out of the service but he should be ..... allowed the claim of the applicant therein and when it was dealt with by the apex court, the apex court by placing reliance of the section 47 of sub section 2 of the act ibid ruled that once an organization is not exempted, there cannot be a discrimination on account of disability in the matter of career progression.8. in the .....

N. Mohammad, Jag Danics Project Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2007)(3)SLJ1CAT

..... 1992. the aforesaid permission to reconstruct was done on a survey by revenue and pwd authorities. the building plan on application was also approved. on 29.1.1993, under section 159 (9) of andaman and nicobar islands, land revenue and land reforms regulation, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as "regulation 1966"), applicant sought permission to dispose of the house ..... the breach of any of the provisions of sub-rule (2) or sub-rule (4), he shall forthwith report the circumstances to the prescribed authority and shall thereafter act in accordance with such order as may be made by such authority.19. learned senior counsel would also contend that the inquiry officer has not established this and as ..... shall, save in the ordinary course of business with a bank or a public limited company, either himself or through any member of his family or any other person acting on his behalf,- (a) lend or borrow or deposit money, as a principal or an agent, to, or from or with, any person or firm or private .....

Shri G.D. Arora S/O Late Sh. S.D. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... surplus and not the delhi government. what is worse, after declaring them surplus and applying rules of 1990, some of the applicants were demoted, such that section officers were made head clerks and udcs were made ldcs. their previous service also stood forfeited for purposes of seniority and promotion.25. learned counsel for the ..... no jurisdiction in respect of dda.32. taking the totality of facts and circumstances of the case into consideration, we come to the conclusion that the act of the delhi government in declaring the applicants as surplus and thereafter absorbing them as surplus staff was without authority. similarly, absorbing them without taking note ..... re-deployed as a measure of sympathy. the respondents have done their best by accommodating the applicants instead of dispensing with their services. the respondents have acted in a fair manner towards the applicants by protecting their pay as also accepting that their past service would be counted for the purpose of pension .....

Ex-const. Narendar Singh S/O Shri Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... 2005 inflicting penalty of dismissal, as upheld by appellate authority's order dated 11th august, 2005 have been challenged in this application filed under section 19 of a.t. act. applicant also challenges findings of inquiry officer whereunder the charge levelled against him was held to be proved and established beyond any shadow of ..... .8. shri om prakash, learned counsel, relying upon rule 20 of said rules strenuously contended that provisions of code of criminal procedure or indian evidence act are inapplicable in departmental proceedings. even the standard of evidence is different. proving the charge beyond all reasonable doubt, as required in criminal trial, is ..... power and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. but that finding must be based on some evidence. neither the technical rules of evidence act nor of proof of fact or evidence as defined therein, apply to disciplinary proceeding. when the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receives support therefrom, .....

Ms. Kanchan Kapoor and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... of its orders derived their force from article 226 of the constitution itself. these could not be touched by an ordinary act of parliament. even if section 3 of the act seeks to take away the basis of the judgment of the calcutta high court, without mentioning it, by enacting what may appear to be a law ..... of the judgment. nevertheless, the two could be viewed as separable sets of rights. if the right conferred by the judgment independently is sought to be set aside, section 3 of the act, would, in my opinion, be invalid for trenching upon the judicial power. 9. i may, however, observe that even though the real object of the ..... act may be to set aside the result of the mandamus issued by the calcutta high court, yet, the section does not mention this object at all. probably this was so because the jurisdiction of a high court and the effectiveness .....

Govind Manish, Joint Vs. Govt. of India Through Its

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... dtd. 27.9.04, addressed to the sp/cbi/acb/new delhi, from sp/cbi/su/chennai, alongwith certificate under section 65-b of the indian evidence act. transfer proforma file, including the transfer proforma of sh. govind manish, for his transfer from new delhi to mumbai, given ..... anr. it was held that: 'the courts exist for doing justice to the persons who are affected....the court is not merely to act as a tape-recorder recording evidence, overlooking the object of trial i.e. to get at the truth, and oblivious to the active ..... in our considered view the answer to the aforesaid question would be in negative. an ordinary man of prudence similarly placed will not act in a manner for which allegation has been made.19. it is well settled that the public functionaries should be duty conscious ..... fir no. rc-dai-2003-a 0031, dtd. 22.5.03, under section 120-b i.p.c. r/w 7,8,9,10,12,13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of p.c. act, 1988. envelope opening cum transcription comparison memo, regarding cd containing voice & .....

Mr. Anil Kumar, Additional Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... the promise the court would have to balance, the public interest in the government's carrying out the promise made to the citizens, which helps citizens to act upon and alter his position and the public interest likely to suffer if the promises were required to be carried out by the government and determine which way ..... anglo afgan agencies air we are unable to accede to the contention that the executive necessity releases the government from honouring its solemn promises relying on which citizens have acted to their detriment. under our constitutional set up no person may be deprived of his authority of law, if a member of the executive seeks to deprive a ..... issue in this oa, which is about agt 2006. we have already discussed this in foregoing paragraph. as far as the fact of the applicant joining at lucknow acting as estoppel is concerned, the learned counsel for the applicant would argue that the applicant joined under compulsion, in view of the order that the transferred officers must .....

Asstt. Sub-inspector Dalbir Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. challenge in the present original application filed under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 is to order dated 30.5.2006 (annexure a-2) passed by additional commissioner of police, special branch, delhi by which the applicant was visited with the ..... it is established that eye witnesses have not supported the case of prosecution and there is nothing incriminating evidence against the accused which requires for recording statement of accused under section 342 cr.p.c. there is no prospect conviction against accused while relying upon such evidence. thus, the prosecution has failed to prove prosecution story for commission of ..... on the same. be that as it may, learned magistrate found that the prosecution had led no evidence, which may even require recording of statement of the accused under section 342 of the code of criminal procedure.9. insofar as the charge, subject matter of departmental enquiry, is concerned, the same is to the effect that the applicant after .....

Sandeep Kumar S/O Shri Sri Ram Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi, Through Its

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... a condition that the services are liable to be terminated as per the provisions of rule 5 of the temporary rules. though they are appointed under section 12 (b) of the delhi police act, 1978, yet governed by the provisions of temporary rules ibid.21. in the light of the above, what is ruled by the apex court ..... temporarily against a temporary post, temporary rules would have no applicability.4. learned counsel would further contend that applicant was issued certificate of appointment under section 13 of the delhi police act, 1978 as well as under rule 21 of the rules where there is no reference to the temporary service or temporary post.5. shri shyam ..... in delhi police on 17.1.2003.while performing his duty, after completion of training, applicant was involved in a criminal case fir no. 263/2004, under section 376 of ipc.an order passed by the respondents dispensed with the services of applicant on termination. meanwhile, the additional session judge acquitted applicant on 14.12.2005 .....

Ex. Constable Ajayvir Gulia S/O Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... the only star witness prosecutrix had turned hostile. applicant was arrested on the basis of prosecutrix's statement and he was also medically examined. she had also given statement under section 161 cr.pc. ms. rashmi chopra, learned counsel strongly refuted the contention that plea of rule 12 had not been considered by concerned authorities. it was pointed out that from ..... created direct threat to the victim and his relatives where she came to stay all the way from orissa. this is the reason that the statement of the victim under section 161 cr.pc was rightly brought on de file by the eo. i heard the appellant in o.r. and observed his gestures, outlook and behaving style. i could ..... , who joined as constable, delhi police in 1990, was involved in a criminal case vide fir no. 1065/2002 dated 04.12.2002 under sections 376/342/506/34 ipc and 25/27/54/59 arms act at police station nangloi. he was taken into custody on 05.12.2002.allegations against him had been that he raped one ms. 's'. he .....