Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... the parties. certain obligations were cast on the dealers to observe marketing discipline and also to comply with the statutory provisions of petroleum act, explosives act, weights and measures act, 1976 the agreement also empowered the hpcl to stop supply of the products to the dealer for breach of conditions contained in the ..... arguments dated 23.12.2009 raising further objections before the arbitrator, contending that the arbitral tribunal did not follow the procedure provided under section 12 of the act and the matter is subjudice before the civil court and the dispute, which pertains to assessing the quantities of earth work executed and ..... "the next question, an incidental one, that arises for consideration is whether the trial court must refer the parties to arbitration under section 8 of the act, 1996." ...................................... "section 8 is in the form of legislative command to the court and once the prerequisite conditions as afore stated are satisfied, the court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... file of assistant sessions judge, sompeta, srikakulam district, in which the petitioner is arrayed as a1 for the offence punishable under section 5 read with section 6 of the explosives substances act, 1908 (for short, "the act"). facts, which give rise to filing of this petition, are that the petitioner is one of the directors of a ..... bag containing explosive substance has been seized. thereby, the inspector of police, vigilance and enforcement lodged a complaint.on the basis of the above complaint a case in crime no.139 of 2000 was registered against one k.v.ramaiah and gopinath das/a2 for the offence under section 5 of the act. after due ..... andhra pradesh. assam, bihar, madhya pradesh and tamilnadu has entrusted all district magistrates in the said states the functions of the central government under section 7 of the act.in the present case before filing the charge sheet a letter has been forwarded to the district collector, srikakulam through the superintendent of police, srikakulam .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... may, keeping in view the cost of living by notification in the official ga?ette, from time to time amend the second schedule." sub-section (2) of section 163-a of the act is specific in its terms to the effect that the claimant or claimants are not required to plead or establish that the death in respect ..... was leaking from the tanker and while general public were collecting the leaking petrol, after a period of 4 1/2 hours of the accident, there was explosion due to fire resulting in burn injuries to some persons standing nearby. in those circumstances, the supreme court upheld granting of compensation to victims who suffered burn injuries ..... in that explosion by observing as follows: "35. this would show that as compared to the expression "caused by", the expression "arising out of" has a wider connotation. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... . 47 (imt-47) a categorical condition was that loss or damage resulting from overturning arising out of the operation was excluded. only damage arising directly from fire, explosion, self-ignition or lightning or burglary, house breaking or theft are included. therefore it had repudiated the claim by its letter dated 9.4.2007. there was no ..... hereby declared and agreed that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this policy that in respect of vehicles insured the insurer shall be under no liability under section i of the policy in respect of loss or damage resulting from overturning arising out of the operation as a tool of such vehicle or of plant forming ..... in new india assurance company ltd. v. sadand mukh, reported in iii (2009) slt 300=ii (2009) acc 432 (sc)=observed that the provisions of the act, therefore, provide for two types of insurance one statutory in nature and the other contractual in nature. whereas the insurance company is bound to compensate the owner or the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... ) from 1990 till 1996.3. the petitioner was involved in crime no.3 of 1996 of seetampeta police station, srikakulam district. he allegedly was found to be in possession of explosives on 16.01.1996. the petitioner faced trial. he was acquitted by the court.4. it is the case of the petitioner that in 2001, the petitioner came to know ..... of 1995 of neelakanthapuram police station, vizianagaram district. it was a case under section 302 of the indian penal code (ipc, for short) as well as under sections 148 and 149 ipc. the charge sheet was also laid for the offences under sections 25 and 27 of the indian arms act. having realized about the case, the petitioner surrendered before the court and was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... not have entertained the petition under article 227 of the constitution and should have directed the respondent to take recourse to the appeal mechanism provided by the act." 51. in cct v. indian explosives ltd, (2008) 3 scc 688, the court reversed an order passed by the division bench of the orissa high court quashing the show- cause ..... ) 6 scc 569, this court considered the question whether a petition under article 227 of the constitution was maintainable against an order passed by the tribunal under section 19 of the drt act and observed: (scc p.570, paras 5-6) "5. in our opinion, the order which was passed by the tribunal directing sale of mortgaged property ..... ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction. 32. no reason could be assigned by the appellant's counsel to demonstrate why the appellate jurisdiction of the high court under section 35 of fema does not provide an efficacious remedy. in fact there could hardly be any reason since the high court itself is the appellate forum." 54. in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... have entertained the petition under article 227 of the constitution and should have directed the respondent to take recourse to the appeal mechanism provided by the act." 51. in cct v. indian explosives ltd, (2008) 3 scc 688.the court reversed an order passed by the division bench of the orissa high court quashing the show- cause ..... 2001) 6 scc 569.this court considered the question whether a petition under article 227 of the constitution was maintainable against an order passed by the tribunal under section 19 of the drt act and observed: (scc p.570, paras 5-6) "5. in our opinion, the order which was passed by the tribunal directing sale of mortgaged property ..... ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction. 32. no reason could be assigned by the appellant's counsel to demonstrate why the appellate jurisdiction of the high court under section 35 of fema does not provide an efficacious remedy. in fact there could hardly be any reason since the high court itself is the appellate forum." 54. in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... m.p.no.1046 of 2012 in cr.no.268 of 2000 of malakpet police station, hyderabad. the petitioner is accused of offences punishable under section 4 of the explosive substances act, 1908 and section 153-a ipc along with two others. he was arrested on 07.09.2011 by the investigating officer and the lower court granted bail to the ..... petitioner on 21.11.2011 under section 167(2) cr.p.c. though in the impugned order, the lower court stated that the passport was not ..... seizing passport by the investigating officer amounts to impounding of the same and that the police officer has no authority to impound a passport under section 10(3) and section 10a of the passports act, 1967 and that the police officer after seizing the passport has to take steps before the regional passport authority for impounding the passport and that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... m.p.no.1046 of 2012 in cr.no.268 of 2000 of malakpet police station, hyderabad. the petitioner is accused of offences punishable under section 4 of the explosive substances act, 1908 and section 153-a ipc along with two others. he was arrested on 07.09.2011 by the investigating officer and the lower court granted bail to the ..... petitioner on 21.11.2011 under section 167(2) cr.p.c. though in the impugned order, the lower court stated that the passport was not ..... seizing passport by the investigating officer amounts to impounding of the same and that the police officer has no authority to impound a passport under section 10(3) and section 10a of the passports act, 1967 and that the police officer after seizing the passport has to take steps before the regional passport authority for impounding the passport and that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... investigation, the police filed charge sheet against 46 persons for punishing them for the offences under sections 147, 148, 324, 326, 307, 302/149 i.p.c and sections 3, 4 and 6 of the explosive substances act, 1908 and section 25(1)(b)(b), 27 of the indian arms act, 1959. out of the said accused, case was split up against 7 of them and ..... or 202, code of criminal procedure] in referred case no. of 19. to.. take notice that the complaint preferred by you under sec of the indian penal code/act no. of is referred by the police as . and that if you dispute the correctness of the finding of the police, you should appear before this court.. within days from .....
Tag this Judgment!