Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 13,350 results (0.125 seconds)

A.V. Koti Reddy and Others Vs. The Union of India, rep.by its Secretar ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... hyderabad city police commissioner on 5.1.2015 is illegal and such license has to be granted by the chief controller under the explosives act, 1884 it is necessary to consider the scope of relevant provisions of explosives act and the hyderabad city police act. 20. section 4 (d) of the explosives act,1884 defines explosives'. it is an inclusive definition and is all encompassing. it specifically includes use of gunpowderfor ..... explosion. any explosion, which is covered by the definition of explosives', if taken up by any authority or person, which is not for private use but for .....

Mohamad Hydar and ors. Vs. the State of Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1953CriLJ454

..... corpses into blasting furnaces. they were charged for murder, conspiracy to murder, to commit grievous hurt with deadly weapons, etc. they were also charged under the explosive substances act. the government of bengal passed an ordinance known as 'the west bengal special courts ordinance' in 1949. later on, this ordinance was superseded by the west ..... negatived. that the high court's exercise of the powers of revision & exercising superintendence over subordinate courts had been negatived by sub-section (2) of section 244 of the govt. of india act 1935 is well borne out by the federal court judgment in the case of - pashupati bharti v. secretary of state air 1938 ..... karimnagar and osmanabad of january 20, and 23, 1950, transferred specific cases - from the special tribunals to the special judges without indicating under which, sub-sections of section 5 of the regulation they were making the orders.4. the list in the order of january 23, 1950, by the civil administrator of osmanabad contains .....

Pannalal Lahoti Vs. State of Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1954CriLJ1093

..... of six months after the proclamation has ceased to operate. it was a characteristic peculiar to an emergency legislation such as the one passed under section 72, government of india act, that it would not survive after the lapse of 6 months after the revocation of the emergency. in so far as legislation by firman was ..... state. provision was also made for the prevention and detention in custody of persons suspected of being hostile. there was provision for prohibiting or regulating matters relating to explosives, inflammable substances, vessels, air-craft, wireless telegraph etc. all this clearly proves that it was essentially a war measure. it gives precedence to rules made under ..... federal or unitary, or something of lesser importance. - 'secy. of state v. moment', 40 ind app 48 (pc) (z8), it was held that section 41(b) of burma act, 4 of 1898, which barred civil courts from determining a claim to any right over land as against the government was ultra vires, as it was in contravention .....

Tungabhadra Industries Ltd., Kurnool Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Kurno ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1955AP257

..... popular sense. now in the ordinary language not only of men of business, and the owners of property (the subject of insruance) but even of scientific men themselves the explosion in the present case would not be said to have been caused by gas. it was not therefore within saying to the exception, which, indeed, was obviously intended by ..... passages in -- 'stanley v. western insurance co.', (1868) 3 ex 71 (c), in which the word 'gas' in the clause 'for such loss or damage as shall arise from explosion by gas' in an insurance policy fell to be considered. in that connection kelly c. b., remarked thus:'the words of the policy are to be construed not according to ..... ground that the deduction was claimed. secondly, we are unable to see how the definition of turn-over could be invoked in favour of the petitioner. section 2. cl. (i), madras general sales tax act says that 'turn-over' means'the aggregate amount for which the goods are either bought or sold by a dealer whether for cash or for deferred .....

Chunduri Venkata Reddy Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1959]35ITR87(AP)

..... the admitted or proved facts were that the company was carrying on business of agents and merchants engaging in the sale of machinery, explosives etc. it held the sole agency for scotland for explosives from the imperial chemical industries ltd. the agency came to an end in 1948 and the terms of the termination of the agreement ..... while so holding the lord president observed as follows :'the appellants' business is entirely different from the business carried on by some one, who under contract, acts exclusively as agent for a single principal.' 8. it was also observed that the assessee in that case was not parting with something which could be described ..... is the case of kelsall parsons and co. v. commissioners of inland revenue. in this case the assessee commenced business as manufacturers, agents and engineers and acted as agents for various manufacturers on a commission basis of such manufacturers' produce. one of such manufacturers was george ellison ltd. of birmingham. it would appear .....

In Re: Kanchamreddi Chinna Ranga Reddi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1962CriLJ318

..... list'.26. in my opinion, the combined effect of the foregoing provisions is that the delegation of the functions of the central government under section 7 of the explosive substances act is valid and the consent given in this case by the governor of andhra pradesh, is not open to challenge.27. jin this connection ..... of all previous notifications on the subject the president hereby entrusts to all state governments, with their consent, the functions of the central government under section 7 of the explosive substances act, 1908 (vi of 1908).' clause (1) of article 258 of the constitution provides:notwithstanding anything in this constitution the president may, with the ..... conferred by clause (1) of article 258 of the constitution, the president has delegated to the state governments the functions or the central government under section 7 of the explosive substances act and by virtue of this delegation, the governor of andhra pradesh has, by an order dated november 5, 1959 (ex. p-31) given .....

Union of India, Railway Administration, Madras and ors. Vs. Eastern Ma ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1964AP172

..... to 'other dangerous goods' only. rule 61 lays down that in addition to explosive, as defined in section 4 of the indian explosive act, 1884, goods mentioned therein shall be deemed to be dangerous goods for the purpose of indian railways act, and in the list miscellaneous dangerous goods, specified in schedule v are included. ..... tariff are to be worked as executive instructions, and for purposes of legal proceeding, actions must be based on the indian explosives act, 1884, and the rules framed thereunder, and the other acts dealing withinflammable liquids, and dangerous, corrosive, and poisonous chemicals etc. rule 2 of the red tariff lays down that the rules ..... a fiction that service of notice on one of the railway administration is service on all the railway administrations. his lordship further observed that section 140 of the act also reinforces the conclusion that each railway administration is having a separate existence, and, therefore, should be informed of any claim if any .....

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Indian Detonators Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1971]28STC84(AP)

..... tribunal seems to have held that inasmuch as the electric energy is used only for the limited purpose of ignition, the detonator which is primarily and essentially an explosive accessory depending for its potency and power on the chemical combination, cannot be classified as electrical goods or appliances. in our judgment, the approach of the tribunal ..... an expert whose opinion forms part of the record of this case. practically, there is no difference between ordinary and electric detonators so far as detonator or explosive portion is concerned. the combination of chemicals compressed in the metallic casting in both the kinds of detonators is essentially the same. if at all there is ..... :a lathe, by itself, even though driven by electrical energy will not come within the scope of the expression 'electrical goods' in section 3(2)(viii) of the madras general sales tax act, 1939. 5. it is unnecessary to refer to the line of reasoning in that case more elaborately for the position has been made .....

Maddi Subba Rao and anr. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1973]30STC528(AP)

..... evidence after p.w. 7 was slapped by a-1, p.w. 1 was preparing to leave as the situation was becoming explosive and it was then that he was attacked. p.w. 1 had demanded only for the production of the register to see ..... peon and would come next day with the police aid and check the registers and stock; and as the situation was going explosive they began to leave the place. then they found a number of persons entering the mill led by a-2 and a- ..... seen whether the action of p.w. 1 and his staff was unauthorised and whether the accused had acted in private defence.9. section 28 of the andhra pradesh sales tax act provides for the right to make a demand for the production of account, register and other documents and ..... other documents maintained in the course of his business :provided that before taking action for the confiscation of goods under this sub-section, the officer shall give the person affected an opportunity of being heard and make an inquiry in the prescribed manner.explanation.- it .....

Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1973CriLJ403

..... on the central reserve police men stationed at r.m.s. office secunderabad causing injuries to some constables. a case was also registered against them under section 307 ipc and section 3 of the indian explosive substances act. the third incident was on the intervening night of 3rd and 4th may, 1969. that was also the result of the conspiracy to which a-1 ..... the rest of the charges and while acquitting a-3 to a-5, he convicted a-1 and a-2 against whom charge no. 16 was framed, under section 5 of the explosive substances act and sentenced each of them to three years' rigorous imprisonment. it is against their convictions and sentences that a-1 and a-2 have preferred the appeal ( ..... was attached to the tin in which the six objects were kept and sealed and he had signed that slip.10. we may at this stage refer to section 5 of the explosive substances act under which a-1 and a-2 have been convicted and sentenced and its application. it reads:any person who makes or knowingly has in his possession .....