Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: us supreme court Year: 2006 Page 3 of about 69 results (0.097 seconds)

Rapanos Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... pollute navigable waters located any appreciable distance from them lacks credibility. r. pierce, technical principles related to establishing the limits of jurisdiction for section 404 of the clean water act 34 40 (apr. 2003), available at www.wetlandtraining.com/tpreljscwa.pdf, cited in brief for international council of shopping centers et al. ..... , 354 f. 3d 340 (ca5 2003) (reading waters of the united states narrowly as used in the oil pollution act of 1990). footnote 6 indeed, [t]he corps approves virtually all section 404 permit[s], though often requiring applicants to avoid or mitigate impacts to wetlands and other waters. gao report 8. footnote ..... (a) authorizes the administrator of the epa to issue a permit for the discharge of any pollutant, notwithstanding section 1311(a) of this title. section 1344 authorizes the secretary of the army, acting through the corps, to issue permits for the discharge of dredged or fill material into the navigable waters at specified disposal sites .....

Arbaugh Vs. Y and H Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a person . 2000e(b).[ footnote 1 ] this employee-numerosity requirement[ footnote 2 ] appears in a section headed definitions, 2000e, which also prescribes the meaning, for title vii purposes, of 12 other terms used in the act.[ footnote 3 ] congress has broadly authorized the federal courts to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over all civil ..... s., at 247.[ footnote 9 ] the basic statutory grants of federal-court subject-matter jurisdiction are contained in 28 u. s. c. 1331 and 1332. section 1331 provides for [f]ederal-question jurisdiction, 1332 for [d]iversity of citizenship jurisdiction. a plaintiff properly invokes 1331 jurisdiction when she pleads a colorable claim ..... vii contains a separate jurisdictional provision, 42 u. s. c. 2000e 6(b), authorizing suits by the government to enjoin pattern or practice discrimination. footnote 5 section 1367(a) states: except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by federal statute, in any civil action of which .....

League of United LatIn American Citizens Vs. Perry

Court : US Supreme Court

..... evidence that politics was not simply one factor in the cracking of district 24, but rather that it was an impermissible, predominant factor. section 5 of the voting rights act was intended to insure that that [the gains thus far achieved in minority political participation] shall not be destroyed through new [discriminatory] ..... representatives of the people legislating comports with our repeated assurances concerning the discretion and flexibility left to the states. section 2 is, after all, part of the voting rights act, not the compactness rights act. the word compactness appears nowhere in 2, nor even in the agreed-upon legislative history. see gingles , ..... in the texas election process stretching back to reconstruction led to the inclusion of the state as a covered jurisdiction under section 5 in the 1975 amendments to the voting rights act. since texas became a covered jurisdiction, the department of justice has frequently interposed objections against the state and its subdivisions. .....

State of Madhya Pradesh and ors. Vs. Yogesh Chandra Dubey and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR332]; JT2006(8)SC595; (2006)IIILLJ1060SC; (2006)4MLJ932(SC); 2006(4)MPHT321; 2006(9)SCALE73; (2006)8SCC67; 2006(3)ShimLC284; 2007(2)SLJ186(SC)

..... means his personal legal condition only so far as his personal rights and burdens are concerned. duggamma v. ganeshayya : air1965kant97 at 101. [indian evidence act (1 of 1872), section 41.]in the language of jurisprudence status is a condition of membership of a group of which powers and duties are exclusively determined by law and not ..... under: (scc p.449, para 22)[we] hold that the workmen of a statutory canteen would be the workmen of the establishment for the purpose of the factories act only and not for all other purposes.see also municipal council, sujanpur v. surinder kumar .8. as the respondents did not hold any post, in our opinion, ..... constitutional obligation shall also be void. if no appointment could be made in terms of the statute, such appointment being not within the purview of the provisions of the act, would be void; he cannot be brought within the cadre of permanent employees. the definitions of 'permanent employee' and 'temporary employee' as contained in the rules must .....

Committee of Management Kanya Junior High School Bal Vidya Mandir, Eta ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2974; JT2006(7)SC562; 2006(8)SCALE222; (2006)11SCC92

..... minority institution.27. it is interesting to note that the question as to whether the jains should be treated to be a minority under section 2(c) of the national commission for minorities act, 1992 came up for consideration before a three-judge bench of this court in bal patil and anr. v. union of india and ..... community which has different sects, sub-sects, faiths, modes of worship and religious philosophies. in various codified customary laws like the hindu marriage act, hindu succession act, hindu adoption and maintenance act and other laws of the pre- and post-constitution periods, definition of 'hindu' included all sects and sub-sects of hindu religions including ..... and you had assured that you will never repeat such mistakes and indiscipline in future. therefore, being the principal of school, i advise you to stop these acts of indiscipline and work as a model teacher.yours faithfully,sd/-(smt. kusum sharma)principalg. jr. high school, bal vidya mandir, etah copy forwarded to following .....

Municipal Council, Sujanpur Vs. Surinder Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR198]; [2006(3)JCR106(SC)]; (2006)IILLJ768SC; 2006(5)SCALE505; (2006)5SCC173; 2007(1)SLJ6(SC); 2006(1)LC761(SC)

..... the validity and legality thereof, an industrial dispute was raised which culminated in a reference made by the appropriate governments under industrial disputes act (`the act') in exercise of its power under section 10(1)(c) thereof the following dispute to the labour court, gurdaspur:whether termination of services of shri surinder kumar, workman is ..... and consequently the high court completely misdirected themselves insofar as they failed to take into consideration that relief to be granted in terms of section 11a of the said act being discretionary in nature, a labour court was required to consider the facts of each case therefore. only because relief by way of ..... personal legal condition only so far as his personal rights and burdens are concerned. duggamma v. ganeshayya : air1965kant97 air at p.101 [evidence act (1 of 1872), section 41]in the language of jurisprudence `status' is a condition of membership of a group of which powers and duties are exclusively determined by law .....

Indian Oil Corporation Vs. Nepc India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2780; 2006(4)CTC60; JT2006(6)SC474; 2006(II)OLR(SC)659; RLW2006(4)SC3380; 2006(7)SCALE286; (2006)6SCC736

..... induced to do. in the first place he may be induced fraudulently or dishonestly to deliver any property to any person. the second class of acts set forth in the section is the doing or omitting to do anything which the person deceived would not do or omit to do if he were not so deceived. ..... a mandatory injunction to the airport authority of india and director general of civil aviation to detain the said aircraft stationed at coimbatore airport, under section 8 of the aircraft act, 1934, so as to enable it to take possession thereof. the high court granted an interim injunction on 16.9.1997 restraining nepc india ..... a security for financial assistance and includes floating charge and crystallization of such charge into fixed charge on movable property. (borrowed from section 2(n) of securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets & enforcement of security interest act, 2002)but there is no 'entrustment of the property' or 'entrustment of dominion over the property' by the hypothecate ( .....

Union Bank of India and ors. Vs. M.T. Latheesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR77]; (2006)IIILLJ791SC; 2006(8)SCALE145; (2006)7SCC350

..... application submitted by the respondent after the proper consideration of the same in the light of the relevant parameters the appellant-bank cannot be said to have acted in an arbitrary manner regardless of the constitutional principles. it is also settled law that the specially constituted authorities in the rules or regulations like the ..... court in harpal kaur chahal (smt) v. director, punjab instructions, punjab and anr. held that illegality once committed cannot be pleaded to legalize other illegal acts. this court also held that where the high court applying a wrong test found certain ineligible candidates to be eligible and upheld their appointment, such a judgment could ..... opinion, came to a wrong finding that the person given employment were kith and kin of four high ranking officials and erroneously held that the appellant acted arbitrarily and capriciously and was indifferent to the needs of his employees and caring only for the high salaried officers of the same bank. it is a .....

Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Owners and Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1828; 2006(2)ALD36(SC); III(2006)BC156(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(2)CHN53; [2006(2)JCR344(SC)]; JT2006(2)SC48; 2006(2)SCALE30; (2006)3SCC100; (2006)1Supreme677

..... , even if it is a deck cargo, could be subject to the limitation as provided in clause (6) of article iii, but for section 2 of the act which specifies that subject to the provisions of the act, the rules set out in the schedule shall have the effect in relation to and in connection with the carriage of goods by sea ..... thinks fit to do so. this jurisdiction of the court to stay the proceedings in appropriate cases is not limited to the jurisdiction conferred on the court in india under section 10 of the code. it is distinct from the jurisdiction conferred by the code and for this proposition reliance was placed on bhagat singh bugga v. dewan jagbir sawhney : ..... the assumption of the possession of an inherent power to act ex debito justitice and to do real and substantial justice. in exercise of this power, the high court can restrain a defendant by injunction in another court in spite of provision of section 10 of the code. in hansraj bajaj's case (supra), the high court put a note of .....

Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs. Sri. C. Kenchappa and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2038; 2006(4)ALD84(SC); [2006(3)JCR319(SC)]; JT2006(5)SC556; 2006(4)KarLJ545; 2006(6)SCALE1; (2006)6SCC371

..... leave petition before this court on the ground that the directions given in the impugned judgment are contrary to the express statutory provisions, in particular section 3(1) and section 47 of the kiadb act.(a) according to the appellant, the high court has committed a serious error in issuing directions to leave one k.m. area from the ..... to disturb the allotment of lands made to gee india technology center pvt. ltd. the court in the impugned judgment directed that the notification under section 3(1) of the act and consequential proceedings or notification or orders issued in regard to the other disputed lands in the writ petition are quashed, to the extent of the ..... area and a number of industries had come up. the appellant submitted that the state has ample power to issue notification under section 31 of the act and acquire the land under section 28 of the act. it was submitted that the entire procedure of law was duly followed by the appellant. it was submitted that gee india technology .....