Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Oct-16-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7103/2014 Ramesh Chandra Lohiya V/s. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order ::: 16.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this matter is very short, and therefore, with the consent of the rival parties matter is heard finally at this stage. By the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 30th September, 2014 (Annex.3) passed by the Police Commissioner, Jodhpur, whereby his licence for sale of explosives bearing No.10/2007 is suspended. The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that two cases under Sections 5/9B(1)(B) of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, 2 Act of 1884) and Section 286 of the Indian Penal Code are pending against the petitioner. From the recitals of the order, it is borne out that th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Oct-16-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7112/2014 Tahir Ali Ansari V/s. State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order ::: 16.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this matter is very short, and therefore, with the consent of the rival parties matter is heard finally at this stage. By the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 14th August, 2014 (Annex.3) passed by the Police Commissioner, Jodhpur, whereby his licence for sale of explosives bearing No.02/2005 is suspended. The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that a case under Section 9B of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, Act of 1884) and Sections 286, 336 of the Indian Penal Code is pending 2 against the petitioner. The suspension of licence was assailed by the petitioner before the app...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Oct-16-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7098/2014 Satyanarayan V/s. State of Rajasthan & anr. Date of Order ::: 16.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this matter is very short, and therefore, with the consent of the rival parties matter is heard finally at this stage. By the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 30th September, 2014 (Annex.3) passed by the Police Commissioner, Jodhpur, whereby his licence for sale of explosives bearing No.38/1993 is suspended. The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that a case under Sections 5, 9B(i) of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, Act of 1884) and Section 286 of the Indian Penal Code is pending against 2 the petitioner. From the recitals of the order, it is borne out that the Commissioner,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jul-02-2014
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10186/2011 Deravar Singh V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. Order dt:2. 7/2014 1/28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10186/2011 Deravar Singh V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. Date of Order :::2. d July, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Shreyansh Mardia for Mr. Sandeep Shah, for the petitioner. Ms.Shweta Bora, for the respondents. --- REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. The present petitioner Derawar Singh S/O Bhakar Singh working as Sub-Inspector of Police has preferred this writ petition claiming an out of turn promotion. against the 10% reserved vacancies for the year 2006-2007 under Rule 28 of the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 which is enacted to reward the police personnel who perform the outstanding and extraordinary acts of courage in discharge of their duties and with their outstanding caliber in the fields like anti-dacoity or anti-smuggling or any special field of poli...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Oct-31-2014
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Abdul Hamid & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan D.B. Criminal Appeal No.929/2013 against the judgment dated 28.4.2012 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.36/2010. Date of Judgment ::31. t October, 2014 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN Mr. Dhirendra Singh, for the appellants. Mr. J.P.Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor, for the State. .... BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE MATHUR,J.) REPORTABLE Being questioned correctness of the judgment dated 28.4.2012 passed by the Court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.36/2010, this appeal is before us. By the judgment impugned learned trial Judge convicted the accused appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 121, 121-A, 122, 123 Ranbir Penal Code read with Section 14 of the Foreigners Act and Section 25 read with ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Feb-28-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.226/1999 LRs of Late Shri Guru Bux Singh versus Khem Singh Date of Judgment :: 28th February,2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.R.K.Thanvi Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Narendra Thanvi, for the appellants. Mr.M.C.Bhoot Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Arpit Bhoot, for the respondent. ---- REPORTABLE BY THE COURT: This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against appellate judgment and decree dated 24.02.1999 passed by Additional District Judge No.2, Jodhpur, whereby, the judgment and decree dated 13.12.1996 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.1, Jodhpur has been modified. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : a suit for eviction on the ground of default in payment of rent was filed on 03.02.1981 by Maji Leel Kanwar Deodi through her power of attorney holder Hanuman Singh against Guru Bux Singh for eviction from shop No.10 and a room adjacent to i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Feb-07-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.152/2013 Smt. Saroj & Ors. Vs. Prabhu Narain Mathur & Anr. Date of Judgment ::07. h February, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. H.R. Soni, for the appellants. Mr. M.D. Boob ) Mr. Mahesh Joshi ), for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: REPORTABLE This appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 22.01.2013 passed by Additional District Judge No.1, Jodhpur Metropolitan, Jodhpur, whereby, the suit filed by the plaintiffs for partition and permanent injunction has been dismissed and order dated 22.02.2013 passed by said Court, whereby, the judgment dated 22.01.2013 was reviewed and the counter claim filed by the defendant No.1 for possession, which was originally dismissed, has been decreed. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the appellants- plaintiffs filed a suit, inter alia, with the averments that they are legal representatives of late Kailash Narayan Mathur (K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Sep-11-2014
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4882/2012. Narendra Kumar Chouhan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dated 11/09/2014 1/14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: ORDER :: S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4882/2012. Narendra Kumar Chouhan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::::11. h September, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. Narendra Kumar Chouhan, petitioner present-in-person. Mr. Jassiram Ramsnehi, OIC, Divisional Sanskrit Edu. Officer, Jodhpur. -- BY THE COURT:1. The lawyers are observing strike which is contrary to various Supreme Court decisions. Names of Dr. Nupur Bhati, as counsel for the petitioner and name of Mr. B.L. Bhati, Govt. Counsel and Digvijay Singh, Addl. Govt. Counsel are shown in the cause list.2. The case is listed at Serial No.90 in today's cause list under the category of For Hearing..3. Heard the petitioner and the Officer-in-Charge, who are present in person and perused the record.4. The petitioner was sele...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jan-13-2014
DBSAW No.116/2008 With two connected matters 1 60 to 62 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :::: JUDGMENT1 D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.116/2008 Narendra Kumar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.2. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.41/2008 Subey Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.3. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.42/2008 Bharat Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT:13. h January 2014. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. MATHUR Mr. B.L. Maheshwari, Sr. Advocate with ]. Mr. Thana Ram ]. Mr. Manish Shishodia ]. Mr. S.P. Arora, ]. Mr. M.A. Siddiqui for Dr. Pratistha Dave ]., for the respective parties. BY THE COURT: (Per Dinesh Maheshwari,J.) These 3 intra-court appeals (SAW Nos.116/2008, 41/2008 and 42/2008), filed respectively by the writ petitioner and by the respondents Nos.5 and 4 of CWP No.5646/2005 against the same order dated 21.01.2008, have been considered together; and are taken up for disposal by this common judgment. After having...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jan-13-2014
DBSAW No.116/2008 With two connected matters 1 60 to 62 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :::: JUDGMENT1 D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.116/2008 Narendra Kumar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.2. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.41/2008 Subey Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.3. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.42/2008 Bharat Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT:13. h January 2014. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. MATHUR Mr. B.L. Maheshwari, Sr. Advocate with ]. Mr. Thana Ram ]. Mr. Manish Shishodia ]. Mr. S.P. Arora, ]. Mr. M.A. Siddiqui for Dr. Pratistha Dave ]., for the respective parties. BY THE COURT: (Per Dinesh Maheshwari,J.) These 3 intra-court appeals (SAW Nos.116/2008, 41/2008 and 42/2008), filed respectively by the writ petitioner and by the respondents Nos.5 and 4 of CWP No.5646/2005 against the same order dated 21.01.2008, have been considered together; and are taken up for disposal by this common judgment. After having...
Tag this Judgment!