Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Aug-29-2013
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER 1 S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.21/2005 Assistant Commissioner, Special Circle, Bikaner Vs. M/s. Somani Mills, Bikaner 2.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.531/2005 Assistant Commissioner, Special Circle, Bikaner Vs. M/s. Bikaner Woolen Mills Limited. 3.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.153/2005 ACTO, Circle-A, Ward 4, Bikaner Vs. M/s. Gayatri Udhyog DATE OF ORDER:29. hAugust, 2013 ::P R E S E N T:: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Dinesh Kumar Godara for Mr. V.K. Mathur, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the petitioners. Mr. Varun Singhvi for Mr. Dinesh Mehta, for the respondent-assessee. *** BY THE COURT: Since common issues and questions of law are involved in all these three revision petitions under Section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act 1994 (for short, the Act of 1994), therefore, all of them are heard together and being disposed of by this common order. [2] At the threshold, while admitting all these...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Oct-18-2013
1 DBCWP (PIL) No.4829/2012 Saddique Mohammad & ORS.versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::::: :: ORDER :: D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO.4829/2012. Saddique Mohammad & ORS.versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.DATE OF ORDER :: 18th October 2013. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.K.MATHUR Mr.S.P.Sharma, for the petitioneRs.Mr.G.R. Punia Sr.Advocate & AAG with Mr.Jamwant Gurjar, for the respondents Nos.1 to 5 & 7. Mr.M.S.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with Akhilesh Rajpurohit & Mr.Rajesh Joshi, for the respondent No.9 BY THE COURT : The instant writ petition has been filed by 13 petitioners as Public Interest Litigation (PIL) stating grievance against the mining operations being carried out by the respondent Hindustan Zinc Limited near village Agucha, Tehsil Hurda, District Bhilwara. The petitioners have stated the summary of the cause to maintain this writ petition as PIL in the following:- Thus, this writ petition in the n...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Oct-30-2013
SMT. SABANA @ CHAND BAI & ANR. VS. MOHD. TALIB ALI & ANR. (S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.362/2011) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER SMT. SABANA @ CHAND BAI & ANR. VS. MOHD. TALIB ALI & ANR. (S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.362/2011) Dated:- 30th October, 2013 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA Mr. D.N.Yadav } Ms. Purnima Yadav } for the petitioners. Mr. N.K.Bohra } for the respondent. Mr. S.D.Purohit } Mr. Amit Sharma } Mr. D.S.Beniwal } Mr. M.K.Trivedi } Mr. Anuj Kala }Counsel assisting the Court. BY THE COURT:( PER HON'BLE MR. SANGEET LODHA,J.) Reportable 1. The legal question that falls for our determination in this reference made by the learned Single Judge of this Court reads as follows: Whether the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be applied retrospectively specially where the aggrieved party (wife) was divorced by the respondent (husband) prior to the Act coming into force on Oc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Oct-01-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR1 D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8074/2010 M/s Laxmi Suiting Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8682/2010 M/s Arun Dal Mills Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.3. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9612/2010 M/s Adarsh Industries Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.4. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10146/2010 M/s Kiran Creations Vs. Raj. State Pollution Control Board & Ors.5. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3615/2011 Anand Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.6. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7932/2011 Multan Singh & Anr. Vs. State (Industries) & Ors.7. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11533/2011 Shatrudhan Rajpurohit & Ors. Vs. State (Irrigation) & Ors.8. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4050/2012 U.R. Beniwal. Vs. State of Rajasthan 9. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8828/2012 M/s Jojoba India P. Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.10. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2087/2013 M/s Building Material Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.11. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2630/2013 Nisa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Aug-19-2013
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR **** :JUDGMENT: Yashpal Singh Chaudhary Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12093/2010 Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of In- dia DATE OF JUDGMENT:19. h August, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Dipesh Beniwal, legal representative of the petitioner, in person. Mr. V.K. Mathur, Assistant Solicitor General of India for re- spondent No.2, Rajasthan High Court. Mr. Anand Purohit, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Pradhuman Singh, for the respondent State. Reportable BY THE COURT (PER HON'BLE LOHRA, J):1. This legal battle was launched at the behest of a compulsorily retired judicial officer for assailing the impugned order dated 31st of March 2010 (An- [2] nex.9), and after his unfortunate demise in Ut- trakhand Gory Tragedy, is pursued by his legal representatives.2. Scorning the checkered history of the case, the brief ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-19-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: (1) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.7/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (2) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.18/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (3) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.19/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (4) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.20/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (5) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.21/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (6) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.22/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara Date of Order :: 19th December, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Vikas Balia ) Mr.Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-19-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: (1) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.7/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (2) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.18/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (3) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.19/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (4) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.20/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (5) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.21/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (6) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.22/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara Date of Order :: 19th December, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Vikas Balia ) Mr.Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-28-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: (1) S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.842/2009 Ram Kumar Vs. Mangal Chand & Ors. (2) S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.767/2012 Ram Kumar Vs. Prabhudayal & Ors. Date of Judgment ::28. h November, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Moti Singh ) Mr. B.R. Chahar ) Mr. R.S. Choudhary), for the appellant. Mr. L.D. Khatri ) Mr. T.R.S. Sodha ) for the respondent-Insurance Company Mr. G.J.Gupta, for the respondent-claimants. ---- BY THE COURT: These appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 ('the Act') filed by the appellant-owner are directed against the judgment and award dated 11.12.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhadra ('the Tribunal'), whereby, the Tribunal exonerated the Insurance Company from liability to pay the compensation awarded, however, directed the Insurance Company to first pay the amount of compensation awarded and then recover the same from the appellant-owner. The brief...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-28-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: (1) S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.842/2009 Ram Kumar Vs. Mangal Chand & Ors. (2) S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.767/2012 Ram Kumar Vs. Prabhudayal & Ors. Date of Judgment ::28. h November, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Moti Singh ) Mr. B.R. Chahar ) Mr. R.S. Choudhary), for the appellant. Mr. L.D. Khatri ) Mr. T.R.S. Sodha ) for the respondent-Insurance Company Mr. G.J.Gupta, for the respondent-claimants. ---- BY THE COURT: These appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 ('the Act') filed by the appellant-owner are directed against the judgment and award dated 11.12.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhadra ('the Tribunal'), whereby, the Tribunal exonerated the Insurance Company from liability to pay the compensation awarded, however, directed the Insurance Company to first pay the amount of compensation awarded and then recover the same from the appellant-owner. The brief...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Aug-29-2013
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER 1 S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.21/2005 Assistant Commissioner, Special Circle, Bikaner Vs. M/s. Somani Mills, Bikaner 2.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.531/2005 Assistant Commissioner, Special Circle, Bikaner Vs. M/s. Bikaner Woolen Mills Limited. 3.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.153/2005 ACTO, Circle-A, Ward 4, Bikaner Vs. M/s. Gayatri Udhyog DATE OF ORDER:29. hAugust, 2013 ::P R E S E N T:: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Dinesh Kumar Godara for Mr. V.K. Mathur, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the petitioners. Mr. Varun Singhvi for Mr. Dinesh Mehta, for the respondent-assessee. *** BY THE COURT: Since common issues and questions of law are involved in all these three revision petitions under Section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act 1994 (for short, the Act of 1994), therefore, all of them are heard together and being disposed of by this common order. [2] At the threshold, while admitting all these...
Tag this Judgment!