Array ( [0] => ..... as it is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. i, therefore, propose to revise the order of the wealth-tax officer dated march 30, 1987, under section 25(2) of the wealth-tax act... '. 2. in and by the notice dated february 20, 1989, issued to the petitioner in special civil application no. 1888 of 1989, the commissioner has stated ..... it is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. i, therefore, propose to revise the order of the wealth-tax officer dated march 27, 1987, under section 25(2) of the wealth-tax act. ' after stating so, the notice has requested the parties to appear either in person or through their authorised representative on march 8, 1989, at 3.30 ..... than twelve months on the valuation date; explanation 1. - a building or part thereof referred to in clause (iii), clause (iiia) or clause (iiib) of section 27 of the income-tax act shall be includible in the net wealth of the person who is deemed under the said clause to be the owner of that building or part thereof. ' 5 ..... [1] => ..... evidence. and legal evidence is impossible to obtain, because out of fear of reprisals witnesses are unwilling to depose in public. that explains why section 59 of the act imposes but a limited obligation on the authorities to inform the proposed externee 'of the general nature of the material allegations against him'. that obligation ..... served has no relevance and irrespective of such detention, the authorities concerned can form the subjective satisfaction for the purpose of taking action under section 56 of the bombay police act. the facts reveal that such satisfaction was arrived at by the authorities concerned and hence we find that there is absolutely no substance ..... its home department. it is as against these orders, the present special criminal application has been filed.2, show cause notice was issued under section 59 of the bombay police act by the police superintendent, (j) division, ahmedabad city, directing the petitioner to show cause against the allegations on 1-7-1987 at 16. ..... [2] => ..... of by this common judgment. 3. in order to appreciate the question about jurisdiction of the court to entertain these proceedings under the arbitration act, it is necessary to look, at section 14 of the arbitration act:-- section 14(1) provides- 'when the arbitrators or umpire have made their award they shall sign it and shall give notice in writing to the ..... would have been made subject-matter of a suit, the suit would have been governed by s. 6(iv)(i) of the bombay court-fees act. section 6(iv)(i) of the bombay court-fees act provides for minimum court-fee of rs. 20/-. valuation in such a suit for accounts, normally will be in the vicinity of the figure, ..... various objections to the award. it is at that stage that objection as to jurisdiction of the trial court in connection with -the proceedings under section 14 as well as 30 of the arbitration act was raised. as these objections covered all the proceedings viz. s. 14 as well as s. 30 applications filed by different objectors, they were ..... [3] => ..... before passing the impugned order of dismissal from service against the petitioner. 4. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 19 of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 the board of directors of union bank of india in consultation with the reserve bank and with the previous sanction ..... and appeal) regulations, 1976, ('regulations' for short). regulation 4 of the regulations enumerates penalties, which may be imposed on an officer employee of the bank for acts of misconduct or for any other good and sufficient reasons. penalties enumerated are divided into two parts : (1) minor penalties and (2) major penalties. dismissal ..... who received objections of the parties and heard them personally or through their representatives was the secretary of the transport department. under the motor vehicles act and the rules framed thereunder, duty was cast on the state government to give personal hearing. the procedure prescribed by the rules imposed a duty ..... [4] => ..... to by mr. g.n. desai, learned counsel for the petitioner, the supreme court was concerned with the interpretation of section 9 and implication of sub-section (2) of section 9 of the citizenship act. sub-section (1) of section 9 contemplates the citizenship of india and the voluntary acquisition of the citizenship of another country by the citizen of india. ..... become a citizen of india. this view, according 10 mr desai for the petitioner, runs counter to the supreme court decision referred to above and section 9 of the citizenship act keeping the said question open, mr. g.n. desai submitted that the decision as 10 whether the petitioner has acquired citizenship by descent will definitely ..... have decided in the present case and that the matter has to be decided only by the central government as provided under section 9(2) of the citizenship act, 1955. section 9(2) of the citizenship act reads:9. termination of citizenship:(1) xxx xxx xxx(2) if any question arises as to whether, when or how ..... [5] => ..... both the provisions cannot stand together.10. the aforesaid conclusion may be examined from the point of view of the provisions of section 14 of the act. section 14 of the act provides for revocation of detention order. after the order of detention is passed and after the person is detained if the appropriate ..... thereby pursue his unlawful activities if so inclined.'the aforesaid observations are required to be kept in mind by the authority exercising powers under section 15 of the act while directing that the detenu be released temporarily. as observed by the supreme court such temporary release even with stringent conditions is likely ..... counsel for the respondents has stated that the petitioner was frequently released temporarily (for a total period of 104 days) under the provisions of section 15 of the act. the details of the application and the period for which he has been released from time to time are as follows:-------------------------------------------------------------------s. no. ..... [6] => ..... exception may be made only where an insistence on it would defeat the ends of justice as required by the law.93. (1). under the second priviso so sub-section (2) of section 309, no adjournment shall be granted when witnesses are in attendance, without examining them except for special reasons to be recorded in writing. so far as possible, all ..... , a charge-sheet was submitted before the trial court on 14th nov. 1979 against the accused for the offence punishable under sections 279 and 338 of the i.p.c. and sections 112 and 116 of the motor vehicles act.5. in this summons triable case the plea of the accused was recorded on 24th june, 1980 whereupon he pleaded not ..... for short hereinafter referred to as 'trial court') wherein the respondent-accused came to be tried for the offences punishable under sections 279 and 336 of the indian penal code r.w. sections 112 and 116 of the motor vehicles act.4. it is alleged by the prosecution that the incident took place on 8th april, 1979 at 8.30 hours in ..... [7] => ..... be granted interim relief by which the respondents and particularly respondent no. 7 should be restrained from deducting tax as provided under the provisions of sections 44ac and 206c of the act in short, the effect of the interim relief prayed for would be to stay the operation and implementation of the aforesaid provisions of law. ..... state of orissa or, at any rate, the action of respondent no. 7 deducting income-tax at source as per the provisions contained in sections 44ac and 206c of the act does not take place within the territory of gujarat. respondents nos. 1 to 6 are the union of india and other income-tax authorities. ..... in the petition is to restrain respondent no. 7, orissa forest corporation limited, from recovering the amount of income-tax pursuant to the provisions contained in sections 44ac and 206c of the act. 2. the petitioners purchased tendu leaves from respondent no. 7, orissa forest corporation limited, the principal office of which is situated at bhuvneshwar (orissa ..... [8] => ..... application as he has done in this case.10. mr. pande, the party in person, brought to our notice the provisions of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act and also various correspondence wherein there is reference for rewarding those persons who are able to give information regarding tax evasion such as octroi etc. we are not ..... hence this decision has no relevance for the disposal of the present case. air 1986 bom 412 (asha goel v. lic of india) deals with the insurance act. that is a case in which fraud is alleged regarding the submission of the medical certificate and ultimately finding out that fraud has been perpetrated. the special and ..... certain amounts as stated in annexure 'l' is made which will entitle the petitioner to the reward as per the provisions of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act and the resolutions passed by the municipal corporation.4. the learned single judge rejected the special civil application on the ground that the claim in the special civil ..... [9] => ..... insurer is, therefore, to cover liability in respect of death of a person entering or mounting the bus. the provisions of sub-section (2) are subject to the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 95 of the act. the liability of the insurer in a case where a person dies while entering or mounting the bus will be governed by the ..... learned single judge of rajasthan high court agreed with the principles laid down by the calcutta high court and thereafter referred to proviso (ii) to sub-section (1) of s. 95 of the act which reads as under: -'(ii) except where the vehicle is a vehicle in which passengers are carried for hire or reward or by reason of or ..... was contended that the deceased was not a passenger. while dealing with this contention the learned single judge of rajasthan high court referred to the provisions of section 95 of the motor vehicles act, 1939 and also referred to a decision of calcutta high court in the case of gobind parsed mukherjee v. surjit bhowmick, reported in 1978 acc ..... ) Explosives Act 1884 Section 4 Definitions - Court Gujarat - Year 1989 - Page 3 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: gujarat Year: 1989 Page 3 of about 37 results (0.031 seconds)

Mar 16 1989 (HC)

Chandravadan A. Taktawala and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-16-1989

Reported in : [1990]182ITR103(Guj)

..... as it is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. i, therefore, propose to revise the order of the wealth-tax officer dated march 30, 1987, under section 25(2) of the wealth-tax act... '. 2. in and by the notice dated february 20, 1989, issued to the petitioner in special civil application no. 1888 of 1989, the commissioner has stated ..... it is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. i, therefore, propose to revise the order of the wealth-tax officer dated march 27, 1987, under section 25(2) of the wealth-tax act. ' after stating so, the notice has requested the parties to appear either in person or through their authorised representative on march 8, 1989, at 3.30 ..... than twelve months on the valuation date; explanation 1. - a building or part thereof referred to in clause (iii), clause (iiia) or clause (iiib) of section 27 of the income-tax act shall be includible in the net wealth of the person who is deemed under the said clause to be the owner of that building or part thereof. ' 5 .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 10 1989 (HC)

Babubhai Mahmandbhai Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-10-1989

Reported in : 1990CriLJ653; (1989)1GLR574

..... evidence. and legal evidence is impossible to obtain, because out of fear of reprisals witnesses are unwilling to depose in public. that explains why section 59 of the act imposes but a limited obligation on the authorities to inform the proposed externee 'of the general nature of the material allegations against him'. that obligation ..... served has no relevance and irrespective of such detention, the authorities concerned can form the subjective satisfaction for the purpose of taking action under section 56 of the bombay police act. the facts reveal that such satisfaction was arrived at by the authorities concerned and hence we find that there is absolutely no substance ..... its home department. it is as against these orders, the present special criminal application has been filed.2, show cause notice was issued under section 59 of the bombay police act by the police superintendent, (j) division, ahmedabad city, directing the petitioner to show cause against the allegations on 1-7-1987 at 16. .....

Tag this Judgment!
Aug 19 1989 (HC)

Maheshchandra Morarji Jani and ors. Vs. S.M. Shukla and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-19-1989

Reported in : AIR1990Guj171; (1990)2GLR753

..... of by this common judgment. 3. in order to appreciate the question about jurisdiction of the court to entertain these proceedings under the arbitration act, it is necessary to look, at section 14 of the arbitration act:-- section 14(1) provides- 'when the arbitrators or umpire have made their award they shall sign it and shall give notice in writing to the ..... would have been made subject-matter of a suit, the suit would have been governed by s. 6(iv)(i) of the bombay court-fees act. section 6(iv)(i) of the bombay court-fees act provides for minimum court-fee of rs. 20/-. valuation in such a suit for accounts, normally will be in the vicinity of the figure, ..... various objections to the award. it is at that stage that objection as to jurisdiction of the trial court in connection with -the proceedings under section 14 as well as 30 of the arbitration act was raised. as these objections covered all the proceedings viz. s. 14 as well as s. 30 applications filed by different objectors, they were .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jul 11 1989 (HC)

Homi B. Munshi Vs. P.G. Shroff and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-11-1989

Reported in : (1989)2GLR645; (1991)IIILLJ469Guj

..... before passing the impugned order of dismissal from service against the petitioner. 4. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 19 of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 the board of directors of union bank of india in consultation with the reserve bank and with the previous sanction ..... and appeal) regulations, 1976, ('regulations' for short). regulation 4 of the regulations enumerates penalties, which may be imposed on an officer employee of the bank for acts of misconduct or for any other good and sufficient reasons. penalties enumerated are divided into two parts : (1) minor penalties and (2) major penalties. dismissal ..... who received objections of the parties and heard them personally or through their representatives was the secretary of the transport department. under the motor vehicles act and the rules framed thereunder, duty was cast on the state government to give personal hearing. the procedure prescribed by the rules imposed a duty .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 24 1989 (HC)

indrajit Vallavbhai Patel Vs. Collector of Kaira and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-24-1989

Reported in : (1989)2GLR865

..... to by mr. g.n. desai, learned counsel for the petitioner, the supreme court was concerned with the interpretation of section 9 and implication of sub-section (2) of section 9 of the citizenship act. sub-section (1) of section 9 contemplates the citizenship of india and the voluntary acquisition of the citizenship of another country by the citizen of india. ..... become a citizen of india. this view, according 10 mr desai for the petitioner, runs counter to the supreme court decision referred to above and section 9 of the citizenship act keeping the said question open, mr. g.n. desai submitted that the decision as 10 whether the petitioner has acquired citizenship by descent will definitely ..... have decided in the present case and that the matter has to be decided only by the central government as provided under section 9(2) of the citizenship act, 1955. section 9(2) of the citizenship act reads:9. termination of citizenship:(1) xxx xxx xxx(2) if any question arises as to whether, when or how .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jun 14 1989 (HC)

Baldevbhai Motibhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-14-1989

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1700; (1990)1GLR129

..... both the provisions cannot stand together.10. the aforesaid conclusion may be examined from the point of view of the provisions of section 14 of the act. section 14 of the act provides for revocation of detention order. after the order of detention is passed and after the person is detained if the appropriate ..... thereby pursue his unlawful activities if so inclined.'the aforesaid observations are required to be kept in mind by the authority exercising powers under section 15 of the act while directing that the detenu be released temporarily. as observed by the supreme court such temporary release even with stringent conditions is likely ..... counsel for the respondents has stated that the petitioner was frequently released temporarily (for a total period of 104 days) under the provisions of section 15 of the act. the details of the application and the period for which he has been released from time to time are as follows:-------------------------------------------------------------------s. no. .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 31 1989 (HC)

The State of Gujarat Vs. Lalit Mohan

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-31-1989

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2341; (1989)2GLR230

..... exception may be made only where an insistence on it would defeat the ends of justice as required by the law.93. (1). under the second priviso so sub-section (2) of section 309, no adjournment shall be granted when witnesses are in attendance, without examining them except for special reasons to be recorded in writing. so far as possible, all ..... , a charge-sheet was submitted before the trial court on 14th nov. 1979 against the accused for the offence punishable under sections 279 and 338 of the i.p.c. and sections 112 and 116 of the motor vehicles act.5. in this summons triable case the plea of the accused was recorded on 24th june, 1980 whereupon he pleaded not ..... for short hereinafter referred to as 'trial court') wherein the respondent-accused came to be tried for the offences punishable under sections 279 and 336 of the indian penal code r.w. sections 112 and 116 of the motor vehicles act.4. it is alleged by the prosecution that the incident took place on 8th april, 1979 at 8.30 hours in .....

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 1989 (HC)

R. Laxmichand and Co. and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-12-1989

Reported in : (1990)84CTR(Guj)232; [1990]184ITR376(Guj)

..... be granted interim relief by which the respondents and particularly respondent no. 7 should be restrained from deducting tax as provided under the provisions of sections 44ac and 206c of the act in short, the effect of the interim relief prayed for would be to stay the operation and implementation of the aforesaid provisions of law. ..... state of orissa or, at any rate, the action of respondent no. 7 deducting income-tax at source as per the provisions contained in sections 44ac and 206c of the act does not take place within the territory of gujarat. respondents nos. 1 to 6 are the union of india and other income-tax authorities. ..... in the petition is to restrain respondent no. 7, orissa forest corporation limited, from recovering the amount of income-tax pursuant to the provisions contained in sections 44ac and 206c of the act. 2. the petitioners purchased tendu leaves from respondent no. 7, orissa forest corporation limited, the principal office of which is situated at bhuvneshwar (orissa .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 01 1989 (HC)

Krashnkumar Balakram Pande Vs. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ba ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-01-1989

Reported in : AIR1990Guj20

..... application as he has done in this case.10. mr. pande, the party in person, brought to our notice the provisions of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act and also various correspondence wherein there is reference for rewarding those persons who are able to give information regarding tax evasion such as octroi etc. we are not ..... hence this decision has no relevance for the disposal of the present case. air 1986 bom 412 (asha goel v. lic of india) deals with the insurance act. that is a case in which fraud is alleged regarding the submission of the medical certificate and ultimately finding out that fraud has been perpetrated. the special and ..... certain amounts as stated in annexure 'l' is made which will entitle the petitioner to the reward as per the provisions of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act and the resolutions passed by the municipal corporation.4. the learned single judge rejected the special civil application on the ground that the claim in the special civil .....

Tag this Judgment!
Aug 11 1989 (HC)

Commissioner, Jamnagar Municipal Corporation, Jamnagar and anr. Vs. Vi ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-11-1989

Reported in : 1990ACJ712; AIR1990Guj134; (1990)1GLR664

..... insurer is, therefore, to cover liability in respect of death of a person entering or mounting the bus. the provisions of sub-section (2) are subject to the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 95 of the act. the liability of the insurer in a case where a person dies while entering or mounting the bus will be governed by the ..... learned single judge of rajasthan high court agreed with the principles laid down by the calcutta high court and thereafter referred to proviso (ii) to sub-section (1) of s. 95 of the act which reads as under: -'(ii) except where the vehicle is a vehicle in which passengers are carried for hire or reward or by reason of or ..... was contended that the deceased was not a passenger. while dealing with this contention the learned single judge of rajasthan high court referred to the provisions of section 95 of the motor vehicles act, 1939 and also referred to a decision of calcutta high court in the case of gobind parsed mukherjee v. surjit bhowmick, reported in 1978 acc .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //