Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: delhi Year: 2006 Page 25 of about 411 results (0.055 seconds)

Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Tourist Taxi Service

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... ,246 as the market value of the vehicle is concerned but set aside the interest as the district forum was not competent to award interest in terms of section 14 of the consumer protection act once it had awarded rs. 15,000 towards cost and damages. even otherwise interest is awardable only in those cases where there is a term of such .....

R.K. Maheshwari Vs. Department of Personnel and Training and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(91)DRJ177

..... petitioner, but in imposition of censure. hence, during this interregnum, petitioner in terms of the said om was not eligible for promotion. petitioner was promoted to the post of section officer on 28.12.2001 vide order no. a 12025 (ii) 3/14-admn. iii on the basis of his name being included in the select list of ..... said memorandum also provides that if any penalty is imposed or he is found guilty in the criminal prosecution, the finding of the sealed covers/cover shall not be acted upon and the case is to be considered by the next dpc in normal course. the memorandum also records the need to ensure expeditious conclusion of the disciplinary case/criminal ..... .9.1992, if any penalty is imposed on a government servant as a result of the disciplinary proceedings, the findings kept in the sealed cover are not to be acted upon. the instructions do not provide for consideration of the case of a government servant for promotion upon imposition of the penalty on the basis of results of examination, .....

Bses (Y) Power Ltd. Vs. Neeraj Kumar

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... consumer dispute or not and, therefore, what was relevant was definition of consumer dispute provided by sub-clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the consumer protection act, 1986. obviously, question of issue relating to theft of electricity or dishonest abstraction of energy could not have formed part of definition ..... power of the district forum, state commission and national commission in exercise of pecuniary jurisdiction (excluding appellate jurisdiction) would be in respect of complaints. section 2(c) of the act defines the complaints as under (c) `complaint means any allegation in writing made by the complainant that (i) an unfair trade practice or ..... 2006 filed by bses challenging various orders passed by this commission involving theft of electricity or dishonest abstraction of energy (dae) as contemplated under section 135 of the electricity act, 2003, the delhi high court has passed the following order, which is dated 8.11.2006: these petitions have been entertained only on .....

Manish Sehgal Vs. American Express Bank Ltd.

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... card when admittedly the dollar card of the complainant was very much alive and was cancelled only subsequently tantamounts to deficiency in service in term of section 2(1)(g) of consumer protection act, 1986 which means any fault, imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance which is required to be maintained by ..... provider. the standard of service provided by service providers has to be adjudged on the anvil of the definition of deficiency in service provided by section 2(1)(g) of the consumer protection act which means any fault, imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance which is required to be maintained by or ..... under written intimation to him. 6. thus according to the o.p. there was no deficiency in service in terms of the provisions of section 2(1)(d) of the consumer protection act as the action taken by the o.p. was as per terms of card member agreement between the parties. in this regard o.p. .....

Dharni Dhar Vs. Air Mauritius and Others

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... alternative route op no. 1 did not do the needful. 22. deficiency in service for the purpose of compensating the consumer under the provisions of section 2(1)(g) of consumer protection act, 1986 means any fault, imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance which is required to be maintained by or under ..... of complimentary ticket without being charged any consideration therefor, and therefore he does not fall within the definition of consumer as defined by section 2(1)(d)(ii) of consumer protection act 1986. relevant abstract of section 2(1)(d)(ii) reads as under : consumer means a person who hires or avails any services for a consideration which has ..... party no. 1 air mauritius has come up with the following pleas : (i) that the complainant is not a consumer within the meaning of section 2(1)(d) of the consumer protection act, as he did not pay any consideration for the ticket on which he travelled as it was a free ticket and this fact had been .....

Bal Bhawan Public School Vs. Shiv Shankar Gupta

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... the complaints of the consumers strictly in terms of section 13(3a) of the act. 18. fdr, if any, deposited by the appellant be returned to the appellant forthwith under proper receipt. 19. a copy of this order, as per ..... of government of nct of delhi being guilty for deficiency in service in not ensuring the decision of the complaint preferably within the statutory period as prescribed under section 13(3a) of the act i.e. within three to five months for want of requisite infrastructure number of district fora, benches of state commission as may be necessary for deciding ..... is more than 500 to 1000 cases. it is in view such a large number of pendency of cases that the main object of the consumer protection act, 1986 as contemplated by section 13(3)(a) has been sacrificed. 3. we are pained to have come across this case which has taken more than 9 long years because of .....

Bank of Madurai Ltd. Vs. Director, Enforcement Directorate

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

..... in india for about two years during june 1982 to april 1985 for his medical treatment with his wife and children, residents of india, who claimed exemption of section 10(4a), income-tax act on the interest which accrued on his nre account during the said period alleging himself to be an nri. supreme court allowed him the benefit of this provision ..... majeed, a person resident outside india in contravention of provisions of section 9(1)(d) of fer act. two memorandum were issued against the appellant for the said charges whereby penalty of rs. 60,000 was imposed by the adjudicating officer against the appellant against which ..... resident in india made three payments totalling to rs. 5 lakhs by way of loan to shri k. abdul majeed, a person resident outside india in contravention of section 9(1)(a) of fer act and also made a payment of rs. 2 lakhs to m/s. t.v.s. sons, madurai, a firm in india on behalf of shri k. abdul .....

Nivedita Sharma Vs. Bharti Tele Ventures and Others

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... complaint as a complaint filed by the complainant on her behalf and on behalf of numerous other consumers, having the same interest and sufferings, as contemplated by section 12(c) of the consumer protection act, 1986 and, more so, when the cellular operators association of india to which o.p. 1 - airtel, i.e. bharti televenture, is one of the ..... . and thus creating nuisance and harassment to the complainant. 24. there is no dispute that the complainant falls within the definition of consumer as defined under section 2(l)(d) of the consumer protection act, 1986, by virtue of having availed the service of cellular operator from o.ps. 1 and 2. 25. o.ps. 3 and 4 are also ..... the o.ps. 1 and 2 and was clandestinely exchanged and shared by it with o.ps. 3 and 4. deficiency in service as defined by section 2(1)(g) of the consumer protection act, 1986 means : any fault, imperfection, short-coming or inadequacy in the quantity, nature and manner of performance which is required to be maintained by or .....

The Workmen of Northern Railway Zonal Training School Mess Canteen Kar ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT18

..... iiillj378sc noticed the distinction between such classes of workmen as domestic servants who render personal service to their masters from those covered by the definition in section 2(j) of the industrial dispute act. it is made clear that if literally interpreted these words are of very wide amplitude and it cannot be suggested that in their sweep it ..... a casual way would fall outside the definition. that is how this court dealt with this aspect of the matter. the whole purpose of the industrial disputes act is to focus on resolution of industrial disputes and the regulation will not meddle with every little carpenter or a blacksmith, a cobbler or a cycle repairer who ..... training school, chandausi, moradabad was an 'industry' or not and if the employees working in the mess of the training school were covered under the industrial dispute act.3. it is undisputed fact that the trainees of the railway zonal training school formed a committee in order to run the mess where they took meals. the .....

Radhey Shyam Gupta Through Legal Representatives Vs. Kamal Oil and All ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2006]133CompCas90(Delhi); (2006)5CompLJ437(Del); 129(2006)DLT346; 2006(88)DRJ676

..... fact that the company petition in which the impugned order has been passed could not be legally maintained since oppression and mismanagement within the meaning of section 397 of the companies act is to be alleged by the minority against the majority. learned counsel for the respondents further submitted that even according to the own showing of the ..... in initial filing. the delay in refiling is not subject to the rigorous tests which are usually applied in excusing the delay in a petition filed under section 5 of the limitation act (see indian statistical institute v. associated builders and ors. air 1978 sc 335). in the present case, the initial delay of 7 days in ..... after removal of objections raised by the registry and delay that occurs in initial filing. `sufficient cause' to be shown for condensation of delay envisaged in section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 is not required to be shown for explaining the delay in refiling, as is required to be shown to explain the original delay.7. a .....