Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 5 of about 205 results (0.117 seconds)

Supervisors Welfare Association Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. supervisors welfare association, joined by smt. arun lata pathak, has filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 taking exception to filling up the posts of child development project officer (hereinafter to be referred as cdpo) by resorting to direct recruitment to the post even though on .....

Rishal Singh, Asi Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... per rules, were each time kept in sealed cover. the only question that needs adjudication by this tribunal in the present application filed by the applicant under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 is as to whether he is entitled to be promoted after his acquittal and when sealed cover had been opened and it was found that the applicant .....

Subhash Chander Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Police Headquarters, I ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... to understand, that anti-social maladies are mostly the result of social imbalances. it must be remembered that on the one hand, social stresses, for various reasons, explosively mount in the real worlds hard environs and the harsh remedy of heartless incarceration and ouster from society deepens the criminality. the swing of the pendulum to the ..... as voluntarily causing hurt is not known to us. what was the nature of insult heaped upon the complainant which attracted the offence punishable under section 504 ipc and what was the act which attracted the crime of criminal intimidation is also not known. but from a trinity of the three i.e. the alleged offence punishable under ..... mostly by the young and/or the inexperienced. some may even undergo a petty sentence of imprisonment of a week or ten days. we may also notice that section 302 cr.p.c. prescribes for taking note of compoundable offences at the instance of the complainant itself and there are cases where compounding can take place with .....

Lalit Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Police and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... , haryana, in which he had been acquitted on 19.02.2007. it is this order which is under challenge in the present original application filed by him under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. 2. it is not in dispute that the applicant had revealed his involvement in the relevant columns of the application and attestation forms. his selection was .....

Surinder Singh Vs. the Secretary, Ministry of Defence (Finance), New D ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... amounting to rs.19.47 lakhs approximately. though the concerned bills related to store contract section, these were processed in m section without obtaining orders of the appropriate authority and without following prescribed procedure. the above act of shri surendra singh, sa resulted in fraudulent payment to the tune of rs.19.47 ..... lakhs approx. to the alleged suppliers and caused pecuniary loss to the govt. the above act indicates complicity with ..... in a manner unbecoming of a government servant. since respondent followed the established procedure which was being followed over the years where bills from other sections were also being processed and payments made thereof, the enquiry officer though found the charge proved, did not hold that respondent had gravely misconducted himself .....

Yatendra Singh Jafa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2004)(2)SLJ185CAT

..... had been discriminated against in that while he has been recommended to be dealt with under article 311(2)(c), dig, bsf had been dealt with under section 20 of the act, giving him an opportunity to explain his case, which has in fact enabled him to continue in service, in spite of the order of removal issued in ..... place before the court or tribunal the relevant material on the basis of which the satisfaction was arrived at subject to a claim of privilege under sections 123 and 124 of the evidence act to withhold production of a particular documentor record. even in cases where such a privilege is claimed the government concerned must disclose before the court ..... only applicant but other officers including dig ashok kumar has been indicated and course of action was suggested. accordingly, ashok kumar who was terminated resorting to section 20 of the b.s.f. act. however, the orders have been set aside by the division bench of jammu and kashmir high court on 21.4.1999, against which slp preferred .....

Guru Dutt Ranga Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)(92)SLJ163CAT

..... order allowed the application on the ground that since the respondent had been discharged and/or acquitted of the offence punishable under section 304 ipc under section 324 read with section 34 ipc and under section 324 ipc, he cannot be denied the right of appointment to the post under the state. the question is whether the ..... note that all the three courts below, even when invited to judge the matter in the said perspective, went on to hold that the act/s involved in conviction under section 294 ipc per se established moral turpitude. they should have been sensitive to the changing perspectives and concepts of morality to appreciate the effect of ..... not however be taken in government service. a list of offences which were considered involving moral turpitude was prepared for information and guidance in that connection. significantly section 294 ipc is not found enlisted in the list of offences constituting moral turpitude. later, on further consideration, the government of haryana on 17/26.3 .....

J.T. Sulaxan Rao and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)(1)SLJ1CAT

..... seniority in the merged cater and a loss of right for consideration of promotion is a reckoning cause of action and the application filed is within limitation under section 21 of administrative tribunals act, 1985. accordingly, the objection stands overruled.78. as far as the objection taken by the respondents as to agreement by the applicants, i.e., government advocates as to ..... their erstwhile service been counted in ils, gives them a valid cause of action and as the application has been filed within the stipulated time, as prescribed under section 21 of administrative tribunals act, 1985, the objection of limitation stands overruled.74. it is also assailed that whereas only the consequence of merger has been challenged and there is no challenge as .....

Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Ias S/O Shri Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through th ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... to bombay and to delhi in response to the letter of second respondent dated 21.5.1996. as the claim possibly might be barred to be adjudicated under section 21 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, a miscellaneous application has been filed for condonation of delay (ma 1127/2006).2. we had heard the applicant in person. mr. gautam godara, who had .....

D.V. Gautam S/O Shri R.D. Gautam Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Throug ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... namely, photocopy of the rukka, copy of the fir no. 260/96, d.d.entries and copy of notification of the government of india, mha and amendment to section 13 of itp act including s.o. no. 116 etc. this pw was duly cross-examined by the applicant. no objection was taken by the applicant at the time when pw-7 ..... it has quashed the dismissal order by reappreciating the evidence and reaching a finding different than that of the inquiring authority. 8. ...the tribunal fell into patent error and acted wholly beyond its jurisdiction. it is not necessary for us to go into the merits of appreciation of evidence by the two authorities because we are of the view that ..... imposing a lesser penalty on the respondent cannot, therefore, be sustained. he was found guilty of the charge framed against him. he was a party to the fraudulent act for self aggrandisement. he prepared bogus documents for withdrawal of salary in the name of ashok kumar who was not working in his division. he has thus proved himself .....