Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... 19 of the said rules has statutory force having been framed by the administrator in exercise of the powers vested in him by virtue of sub-section (1) of section 147 of the said act. accordingly, no circular, guidelines or office memorandum can supplant the substantive rules. no policy can be made contrary to the statutory rules. accordingly, ..... 1980 (for short hereinafter referred to as said rules) have been framed by the administrator in exercise of the power conferred upon him by sub-section (1) of section 147 of the said act. thus, promotion and confirmation of the petitioner and other members of the delhi police is governed by the said rules. rule 5 of the said ..... erroneous in the factual and legal context of the present case. 8. petitioner is a member of delhi police. clause (b) of section 5 of delhi police act (for short hereinafter referred to as said act) provides that the recruitment to, and the pay, allowances and all other conditions of service of the members of, the delhi police .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... difference in backwages should be paid right from the year 1971. at the same time we do not think that the tribunal was right in invoking section 21 of the administrative tribunals act for restricting the difference in backwages by one year . 10. in the above facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that this case ..... application for condonation of delay but he has not given any good or sufficient reason to condone the delay of over eight years in filing this original application. section 21 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 reads as under: 21. limitation. (1) a tribunal shall not admit an application,- (a) in a case where a final order such as ..... is mentioned in clause (a) of sub- section (2) of section 20 has been made in connection with the grievance unless the application is made, within one year from the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... passed in oa no.89/2009 decided on 14.12.2011, having its operative part as under:- 10. in the instant case, the vigilance wing/section of the department of telecommunication has been involved in all the stages of the disciplinary inquiry conducted against the applicant, and, therefore, the whole process of ..... if he so desires. 17. the learned counsel for the respondents has also submitted that the disciplinary authority, the appellate authority and the revisionary authority have acted independently and passed reasoned and speaking order after going through the charge sheet, documents available on record, evidences adduced during the inquiry, inquiry report and representations ..... of the vigilance department. he has also stated that the disciplinary authority did not apply his independent mind in deciding the matter, rather he was acting on the behest of the vigilance department. he has also submitted that the appellate authority actually wanted to reduce the penalty by imposing the penalty of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... impugned conditions no.8 k and 10 itself, and has made the following prayers in the oa:- i) to quash and set aside impugned condition no.8k and 10 in section-c of the advt. no. 02/08, since applicant had not applied for two posts in the same category as well as the action of the respondents by which they ..... annexure-e. the applicant thereafter sought to know from the respondents the reasons for her non-selection, through application under the right to information (rti, for short) act, 2005, when the reply under rti act dated 25.11.2009 was furnished to her. even before receipt of this information, the applicant had filed detailed representation on 19.10.2009 (annexure-g). in this .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... is one criminal case, however, no previous approval, mandatory for conducting any enquiry and/or investigation under section 6-a of the delhi special police establishment act, 1946 and sanction under section 19 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 has yet been accorded by the government. it is, therefore, averred that the inquiry and ..... not be revised until the conclusion of departmental/judicial proceedings. it is averred in the oa that the applicant requested for information under right to information act, 2005 and was informed that large number of similarly situated persons as the applicant have already been granted benefit of 6th cpc recommendations relating to revision ..... would contend that the revision of provisional pension was granted to the similarly situated persons as the applicant had received this information under right to information act, 2005. in most of those cases the pension was granted under the 6th cpc explaining that such payments would be subject to the outcome of .....
Tag this Judgment!