Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 12 of about 205 results (0.072 seconds)

insp. Ishwar Singh S/O Shri Bhim Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Though the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... his duty in a most efficient manner and cannot be held responsible for any negligence.findings recorded by inquiry officer are vitiated for reasons that provisions of section 138 of delhi police act have been completed over-looked. authorities had not taken into account the distance between the vvip and the applicant on the day of function. inquiry ..... consisting of 6 security personnel si nagbhushan, d/3282, si rajeshwar, 169/d, asi diwan chand, 2288/d, asi balwant bhai, 2570/sec., asi kalu ram, 2399/d and asi sansar pal, 2594/sec. were also deployed under the supervision of inspector ishwar singh for carrying out a.s. check of venue and after that to provide close protection ..... , no. 169/d, asi om prakash, no. 3967/d, asi diwan chand, 288/d, asi balwant bhai, 2570/sec., asi kalu ram, 299/d, asi sansar pal, 2594/sec., hc chand singh, 29/sec., ct. dharam dev, 1404/sec. that 'on 11.5.2001, technology day function to give away the national awards was organized by ministry of human resource .....

Ex-const. Narendar Singh S/O Shri Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... 2005 inflicting penalty of dismissal, as upheld by appellate authority's order dated 11th august, 2005 have been challenged in this application filed under section 19 of a.t. act. applicant also challenges findings of inquiry officer whereunder the charge levelled against him was held to be proved and established beyond any shadow of ..... .8. shri om prakash, learned counsel, relying upon rule 20 of said rules strenuously contended that provisions of code of criminal procedure or indian evidence act are inapplicable in departmental proceedings. even the standard of evidence is different. proving the charge beyond all reasonable doubt, as required in criminal trial, is ..... power and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. but that finding must be based on some evidence. neither the technical rules of evidence act nor of proof of fact or evidence as defined therein, apply to disciplinary proceeding. when the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receives support therefrom, .....

Sandeep Kumar S/O Shri Sri Ram Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi, Through Its

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... a condition that the services are liable to be terminated as per the provisions of rule 5 of the temporary rules. though they are appointed under section 12 (b) of the delhi police act, 1978, yet governed by the provisions of temporary rules ibid.21. in the light of the above, what is ruled by the apex court ..... temporarily against a temporary post, temporary rules would have no applicability.4. learned counsel would further contend that applicant was issued certificate of appointment under section 13 of the delhi police act, 1978 as well as under rule 21 of the rules where there is no reference to the temporary service or temporary post.5. shri shyam ..... in delhi police on 17.1.2003.while performing his duty, after completion of training, applicant was involved in a criminal case fir no. 263/2004, under section 376 of ipc.an order passed by the respondents dispensed with the services of applicant on termination. meanwhile, the additional session judge acquitted applicant on 14.12.2005 .....

Shri Ram Kishan the General Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through, the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... .11.1992 given in ta 570/1996 wherein it was held that cghs is an industry within the meaning of section 2(j) of industrial disputes act. it was also held therein that section 2(c) of industrial disputes (amendment) act, 1982 has not yet been brought into force. this judgment is reported to have been upheld as slp was dismissed ..... the issue, reliance placed by applicants on any judgment given by the tribunal is of no value specially when amendment has been carried out in sub section (j) of section 2 of industrial disputes act, which is evident from the book of g.m. kothari on industrial law fifth edition 2000. in the explanation to sub ..... central government heath scheme employees association informing him as follows: i am also directed to state that section 2 (j) (ii) (b) (2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 stipulates that hospitals and dispensaries are out of the purview of the industrial disputes act, 1947, and hence the notice served by you for agitational programme is not valid.11. .....

Dr. V.K. Dwivedi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... memorandum dated 10.4.2002, whereas the present oa was filed only on 08.8.2007 that is after more than 31 months. period of limitation as per section 19 of administrative tribunals act, 1985 is one year, therefore, definitely the oa was barred by limitation.replying to legal notice does not give fresh cause of action to the applicant.33 ..... conduct) rule 1964 as extended to icar employee.applicant authorized shri r.d. sagar to act as his defence assistant.after hearing defence assistant and perusing the evidence on record, the charge against applicant was found to be proved by the inquiry officer. copy of the ..... .10.2000) and did not comply with the instruction for returning back to india and reporting for duty at ivri izatnagar. by his aforesaid acts dr. v.k. dwivedi, exhibited lack of devotion to duty and acted in a manner unbecoming of a council's employee and thereby violated the provisions of rule-3(1) (ii) (iii) of ccs ( .....

Satish Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... other evidence produced and is not the only determining factor. (emphasis supplied) 8. thus, as can be seen from the portion as quoted above, it is evident that section 45 of the evidence act makes the opinion of the expert admissible though not conclusive and such evidence has to be corroborated by other piece of evidence. if the matter is viewed in ..... be relevant to refer the judgment of the apex court in the case of state of himachal pradesh v. jai lal, (1999) 7 scc 280 here: 17. section 45 of the evidence act which makes opinion of experts admissible lays down that when the court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law, or of science, or art ..... examine the contention of the appellant relating to expert evidence, it is a settled legal position that the opinion of the expert is relevant as provided by section 45 of the indian evidence act, 1872 but the report submitted by an expert does not go in evidence automatically. he is to be examined as a witness in the court and has .....

Harvir Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police, New Delhi and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... , chairman: 1. applicant in the matter of promotion to the post of head constable has been overlooked. in the present original application filed by the applicant under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, the obvious prayer is to direct the respondents to admit his name in promotion list c drawn on 10.12.2009 and promote him to the rank .....

Shri Baljeet Singh Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Comm ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... before us cannot be entertained as no foundation thereof was laid before the tribunal. it was open to the first respondent to make proper application under section 21 (3) of the act for condonation of delay and having not done so, he cannot be permitted to take up such contention at this late stage. in our opinion, ..... the tribunal after the expiry of three years could not have been admitted and disposed of on merits in view of the statutory provision contained in section 21(1) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. 5. in the instant case, as per petitioners own showing, he was selected in the year 1997. if he was not ..... parting with the case, we consider it necessary to note that for quite some time, the administrative tribunals established under the act have been entertaining and deciding the applications filed under section 19 of the act in complete disregard of the mandate of section 21, which reads as under:- 21. limitation - (1) a tribunal shall not admit an application, - (a .....

Dr. Alok Singh and Others Vs. Commissioner and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... be eligible, has in an arbitrary and illegal manner recommended him for promotion, which would be unlawful and contrary to the provisions of section 96 of the dmc act and relevant regulations. it is on the facts as fully detailed above that a prayer has been made to set aside the order dated ..... director (horticulture) and deputy director (horticulture) by way of promotion, it would be appropriate to refer to the recruitment rules. in the hierarchy of posts, section officer (horticulture) comes at the bottom. recruitment on the post aforesaid is 25% by promotion and 75% by direct recruitment. essential qualification for both promotion and ..... wrongly promoting ineligible persons, including the 3rd respondent, on the posts of assistant/deputy director (horticulture) during the last two years, and, therefore, some section officers with look after charge filed an original application bearing oa no.2079/09 in this tribunal challenging the action of the respondents in promoting ineligible persons .....

N.K. Suroya, Ias (Retd.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2003)(3)SLJ34CAT

..... -339, vaishali nagar, jaipur) in summer 1991 and november, 1991 when she was alone at her residence. on both these occasions, her husband shri vijay pal who was working as section officer in niam was sent on official tour with the approval of the director general. by visiting mrs. stella pal at her residence in the absence of her husband and ..... the facility of submitting a memorial to the president as envisaged under rule 25 of the ais (d&a) rules, 1969 and in terms of the provisions of a.t. act, 1985.14. we find that the io has given a very exhaustive report taking into consideration all the evidence on record, the applicant was given enough opportunity to cross examine .....