Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-13-2003
Reported in : 2003(3)ALD545; 2003(4)ALT450
..... an industrial dispute in i.d.no. 22 of 1997 before the labour court-i, hyderabad. 3. before the labour court, the petitioner filed an application under section 2-a(2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 and the management - 2nd respondent herein - filed a detailed counter- affidavit. on the basis of the pleadings of both the parties, the labour court framed ..... is a firmly established principle that justice should not only be done, but should seem to be done and justice can never be seem to be done, if a man acts as a judge in his own cause and he is himself interested in its outcome. this principle of natural justice also equally applies to the exercise of quasi-judicial powers .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-13-2003
Reported in : [2004]136STC100(AP)
..... (1961)iillj77sc , the supreme court was concerned with the question whether the 'salt works' come within the definition of the word 'factory' under clause (m) of section 2 of the factories act, 1948. the question was as to whether the salt works covering an area of about two hundred and fifty acres is to be treated as a factory within ..... the meaning of clause (m) of section 2 of the factories act, 1948. on the entire land, the only buildings consist of temporary shelters constructed for the resident labour and for an office. the question that had ..... product from that of the bulk gas purchased by the petitioner. we are unable to persuade ourselves to accept the submission. the distribution order issued under section 3 of the essential commodities act, 1955, in no manner, deals with the manufacture of lpg. the very purpose of the distribution order is to regulate the supply and distribution of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-21-2003
Reported in : 2003(6)ALD723
..... that date, was passed.3. thereafter, the petitioners and respondents 1 to 12 filed wpmp no. 9278 of 2002 under order xxii rule 3 read with section 151 cpc praying this court to record compromise in terms of the memorandum of compromise. respective counsel representing the parties, vouched for the genuinity of signatures of ..... shankar reddy. copies of the report were made available to the respective advocates representing various parties. learned advocates have filed their affidavits disowning their role in the acts of forgery.7. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the view that the material available on record is ..... the parties on the memorandum of compromise as well as its contents. acting on the same, this court passed the following order:'during pendency of the writ petition, the petitioners, on the one hand, and the respondent nos. 1 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-09-2003
Reported in : AIR2003AP287; 2003(2)ALD297; 2003(6)ALT814
..... . 447/99. it was also stated that the appellant had purchased the property during the pendency of the litigation and hence the sale transaction is hit by section 52 of the transfer of property act, 1882.6. as already referred to supra, on behalf of the respective parties, exs.a1 to a8 and exs.b1 to b4 were marked and ultimately the ..... /2000 on the file of principal senior civil judge, vijayawada. the 'appellant herein, the plaintiff in the aforesaid suit, filed an application under order 39 rules 1 and 2 and section 151 of the code praying for temporary injunction against the respondent-society restraining the said society from executing the decree to the extent of the plaint schedule property in ep .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-14-2003
Reported in : 2003(5)ALD150; 2003(5)ALT143
..... with his report thereon to the board within thirty days after it has been received by him.'58. that apart, a bare reading of whole of section 181 of the act, which deals with the power of board to sanction or refuse to sanction the erection or re-erection, as the case may be, of the building ..... to be referred to defencevestate officer and the board has no right to accord permission without reference of the application to the defence estate officer. section 181(3) of the act reads as follows:'the board, before sanctioning the erection or re-erection of a building on land which is under the management of the defence ..... circle, secunderabad. the defence estate officer expressed his definite objection against the building application submitted by the writ petitioner.57. that as per section 181(3) of the cantonments act, 1924 (for short 'the act'), once the property in which a construction permission is sought, for is recorded as government property in the general land register, the building .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-10-2003
Reported in : 2003(5)ALD644
..... and even failed to hear arguments on behalf of the appellant and posted the case for the same evening to announce the order.17. scope of section 39 of the act has been noticed in the impugned order stating .that mandatory injunctions are granted to prevent the breach of an obligation for which discretion is given to ..... for from the court below.12. before we proceed further, it would be necessary for us to refer to certain averments made in the petition filed under section 9 of the act.13. the respondent and the appellant entered into an agreement on 19.11.2002 for distribution of package of satellite channels through irds (integrated receiver decoders) ..... at liberty to take appropriate proceedings.10. the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that it was a fit case where in a petition filed under section 9 of the act the court could intervene and grant interim measure of protection pending consideration of the main petition, which the court below has rightly done it in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-22-2003
Reported in : 2003(6)ALT212
ORDERDevinder Gupta, C.J.1. Fourth respondent herein, viz., Tappers' Co-operative Society, Bhainsa, Adilabad District, rejected appellant's application for membership in the society. Representation made by appellant to the Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Karimnagar Division, was also rejected on the ground that 'tapper' means a person who is major and who is engaged in the profession of tapping and who can climb and draw toddy from the toddy trees and the appellant was not engaged in the profession of tapping toddy, but was engaged in doing business in jewellery at Bhainsa. After rejection of his representation, appeal was filed, which was dismissed by the Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad, on 18th of July, 2002. Learned Single Judge also dismissed the writ petition of the appellant on the ground that the appellant has not fulfilled the required criteria for being admitted as a member of the society.2. Appellant has no vested right to be admitted as a mem...
Tag this Judgment!