Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-28-2003
Reported in : 2004(2)ALT437
ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.1. The petitioners five in number are all students of Nizam college, The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents are not issuing them Hall Tickets and permitting them to take their respective examinations for the course pursued by them in the 2nd respondent college, This refusal is on account of shortage of attendance of the petitioners.2. The petitioners claim to be young Cricketers who have been selected to represent the State and the Hyderabd Cricket Association at various levels. They are pursuing B.A., and B. Com., courses in the 1st and 2nd years. The Schedule for the Semester examination was notified in the 2nd week of October 2002 for the commencement of examination. The petitioners were not issued Hall Tickets. They complain that the leave availed by them for enabling their participation in various tournaments and for attending camps organized by the Board of Control for Cricket in India has not been taken into account by the respondents in c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-31-2003
Reported in : III(2003)ACC559
Dubagunta Subrahmanyam, J.1. This appeal is filed against the award dated 1st January, 1996 in O.P. No. 1219 of 1992 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional Chief Judge-cum-Principal Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The A.P.S.R.T.C. filed this appeal.2. On 31st August, 1992 at about 9.45 p.m., R.T.C. bus bearing registration No. AP-9-Z-2300, was proceeding from Hyderabad to Guntur. When the bus crossed Nalgonda Cross-roads in the city and proceeding forward towards Dilsukhnagar, an Ambassador car bearing No. AAY 2054, came in the opposite direction. Deceased S. Raju and some others were travelling in the Ambassador car. There was collusion between R.T.C. bus and Ambassador car. Raju sustained injuries in the accident. He was shifted to Osmania General Hospital. Later he succumbed to injuries while undergoing treatment in the hospital. His wife and other dependants filed the claim application seeking a total compensation of Rs. 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-19-2003
Reported in : I(2006)ACC514
..... tribunal made in the said i.a. no. 161 of 2001 of its file, filed before it by the said private person against the railways under sub-section (2) of section 17 of railway claims tribunal act, 1987, refusing to condone the delay of 2190 days, in filing the claim application in respect of the death of her deceased son in a train .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-26-2003
Reported in : I(2005)ACC69
..... district judges are not applying their mind to the principles evaluated by the series of decisions written by the superior courts, as well as the provisions of the motor vehicles act in awarding compensation. though they are expected to award compensation under several heads taking the gravity of the injuries sustained by the victim, the income and status of the individual ..... awarded compensation of rs. 75.000/- to the claimant without dividing the compensation under various heads, which is highly illegal and not in consonance with the provisions of motor vehicles act and also the ratio laid down by the superior courts while awarding the compensation. even though the value of the medical bills ex. a6 series produced by the claimant is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-04-2003
Reported in : I(2005)ACC448
..... employment.unless an employee can establish that the injury was caused or had its origin in the employment, he cannot succeed in a claim based on section 2(8) of the act. the words 'accident arising out of...his employment' indicate that any accident which occurred while going to the place of employment or for the purpose ..... he was hitting the rabbit, it was outside the course of employment and, therefore, he was not liable to pay any compensation to the petitioner under section 3 of the act. the commissioner rejected the contention of the appellant and awarded compensation. it is against this order, the appellant has preferred the appeal contending the view ..... and in this attempt he fell down from the lorry and met with the accident which resulted in his death. respondent filed the application under section 3 of the workmen's compensation act, claiming compensation for the loss of life of her husband, contending that he met with the accident during the course of employment. the appellant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-24-2003
Reported in : 2003(2)ALT334
..... making representations althrough and the same were rejected time and again. in fact, the first representation said to have been made by the petitioner on 4-1-1977 was not acted upon and immediately he could have worked out his remedies. instead of doing so, the petitioner went on making representations to the respondents for about 20 years. the petitioner is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-03-2003
Reported in : 2003(5)ALT597
..... which has to be blamed for having not submitted the details, which were required pursuant to the show cause notice. it is also stated that under the scheme of the act the university is under obligation to collect and pay professional tax giving details in a particular proforma and failure of such duty would attract penal action also against the university .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-23-2003
Reported in : 2004(1)ALD19
..... of the same matter which is lawfully available. therefore, whenever there is a contravention of fundamental rights complained by reason of the remedy available under section 6(1) of the constitution the court had inherent powers and it was legitimate to claim monetary compensation for any contravention. such compensation can be ..... who delivered the majority judgment referred to chapter-i of the constitution of trinidad and tobago (recognition and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms), especially sections 1 to 5 and considered, inter alia the question whether the appellant was entitled to monitory compensation for the period he spent in prison.25. the ..... contravention of the constitutional rights, which resulted from the order of another high court judge acting in his judicial capacity, the failure of the judge to inform the nature of the contempt charged did not contravene the rights under section 1(a) of the constitution. a further appeal was filed before the privy council. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-28-2003
Reported in : 2004(1)ALD550
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J. 1. The revision petitioner aggrieved by the order made by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram dated 18-7-2003 in F.D.I.A. No. 572 of 2002 in O.S. No. 17 of 1997, had preferred the present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. The facts in brief are as hereunder:3. The revision petitioner as plaintiff filed a suit in O.S. No. 17 of 1997 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram for the relief of partition and separate possession of his 1/3rd share praying for the division of properties into three equal shares by metes and bounds. The learned Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram had decreed the suit on 26.4.2002. The revision petitioner, as plaintiff aggrieved by the fact that the relief of mesne profits had not been granted, preferred A.S. No. 1991 of 2002 on the file of this Court and the same is pending disposal. In the said appeal, in C.M.P. No. 20657 of 2002, initially interim stay of passing of final decree w...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-13-2003
Reported in : 2004(1)ALD565
ORDERD.S.R. Verma, J.1. Heard both sides.2. This civil revision petition is directed against the order and decree, dated 4-1-2003, passed by the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, allowing the application in IA No. 1515 of 2002 in O.S. No. 90 of 2002, directing both the parties to adduce evidence on the preliminary issue.3. The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant. The suit is filed for declaration of title and possession.4. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.5. From the averments of plaint, it could be seen that the plaintiff contends that she entered into an agreement of sale, dated 10-10-2000, with one Smt. Vijaya Lakshmi; that the said Vijaya Lakshmi died subsequently without performing her obligation under the said agreement of sale. It is also admitted that she died issueless and she has no other legal representatives also. It is also the averment in the plaint that subsequently the plaintiff came...
Tag this Judgment!