Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2003 Page 60 of about 717 results (0.095 seconds)

Feb 24 2003 (HC)

Rajabathula Suryanarayana and ors. Vs. Yedukula Lakshmi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-2003

Reported in : 2003(5)ALT367

..... of the plaintiffs and the defendants, as conclusive proof of the existence of the channel s.m. from the tank upto the plaintiffs land and whether the court below acted contrary to sections 91 and 92 in not doing so 10. apart from these questions, the learned counsel also had pointed out to ground no. 8 which relates to the sale deed ..... the plaintiffs' wet land would be not less than 20 bags had they been allowed to cultivate their lands. the loss sustained by the plaintiffs is due to the alleged acts of the defendants 1 to 10 and their men only. it was further pleaded that the plaintiffs got issued notices to the defendants 1 to 10 calling upon them to ..... the effect of an instrument is permissible when there remains a doubt as to its true meaning and evidence of the acts done under it is a guide to the intention of the parties in such a case and particularly when acts are done shortly after the date of the instrument. the trial court while answering issue no. 5 had observed that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2003 (TRI)

Arora Enterprises and Another Vs. Superintendent of Police

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Mar-24-2003

P. Ramakrishnam Raju, President: 1. This is an application to condone the delay of 9 days in filing the appeal. 2. What is stated in the affidavit of the Advocates clerk of the petitioner is that though the appeal has to be filed before 7.1.2003 and also the papers were entrusted on 6.1.2003 due to heavy work, the appeal could not be filed till 15.1.2003. The period of limitation cannot be extended depending on the work-load on the clerk-cum-typist. Hence this application is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. Even otherwise there are no merits in the appeal. 3. The opposite parties in C.D. No. 113/2002 on the file of District Forum, West Godavari, Eluru are the appellants. 4. The case of the complainant is that he is the Superintendent of Police, West Godavari who ordered for supply of Gym material with 10 guage standard with specifications mentioned in the quotation from the appellants. But actually what was supplied is 9 guage material which are inferior quality and defec...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2003 (HC)

Akula Ramulu and ors. Vs. Kammari Balaram and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-10-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD52; 2003(3)ALT443; 2003AIHC2538

..... reasons why the objections raised by the appellants herein cannot be taken into account. the scope of adjudication of claims in execution proceedings is delineated by section 47 of cpc. under it, the executing court can decide only those claims raised by the parties or claiming through them. the 3rd parties have no ..... the decree holder initiated execution proceedings and a 3rd party, who was granted occupancy rights under the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act 1948, resisted the same. taking into account section 85 of the act, which ousted the jurisdiction of the civil courts and also the overriding effect given to the provisions of the said ..... act, the objection on the basis of occupancy certificate issued therein, was sustained. it should not be forgotten that the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1948 and similar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2003 (HC)

Mohd. SharfuddIn (Died) by Lrs. Vs. Mohd. Jamal and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-19-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD83; 2003(5)ALT86

..... their father in 1981 and they sold the same to third parties in 1997. however, this court observed that no contempt case would lie under sections 10 and 12 of the contempt of courts act and left it open to the petitioners to convert the contempt application to that of application under order 39 rule 2-a of code of civil ..... waste therein. to permit such a plea would be to ignore the principle of public policy embodied in sections 11 and 146 of the code of civil procedure on the one hand and section 52 of the transfer of property act on the other. the contention on behalf of the legal representatives of the judgment debtor is that the decree holder ..... through or under him. this we understand is the object of section 146 of the code of civil procedure. considering the scope of that section consistent with the principle of public policy as embodied in section 11 of the code of civil procedure and section 52 of the transfer of property act, we are of the view that the executing court was right .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2003 (HC)

Maguluri Venkata Subba Rao Vs. Syed Khasim Saheb and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-18-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD134; 2003(3)ALT318

ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. This revision petition is filed challenging the order and decree dated 22.11.2002 passed by the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Podili, Prakasam District in I.A.No. 108/2002 in O.S. No. 68/2000.2. By the impugned order, the Court below dismissed the I.A. filed by the plaintiff under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint. Aggrieved by the order of dismissal, the plaintiff filed this revision petition.3. The parties shall be referred to as per their array in the original suit, for convenience.4. The brief facts are that initially the plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction against defendants 1 and 2. His claim is that he purchased the suit schedule property from one Maguluri Venkata Subbaiah, under an agreement of sale dated 14.5.1986 and that since then he has been in possession. As the defendants areinterfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment, he filed the suit for permanent injunction.5. The defendants filed the written statemen...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2003 (TRI)

J. Gopal Vs. Nagarjuna Blood Bank

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jan-31-2003

P. Ramakrishnam Raju, President: 1. The complainants son Master Akshay aged about 11 months was admitted in the 2nd opposite party hospital for complaint of loose motions. After treatment he was discharged on 13.8.1997. Again on 31.8.1997 the boy was admitted for complaint of fever and cough. He was under the treatment of Dr. P. Madan Mohan Rao of opposite party No. 2 hospital who diagnosed the disease allergic breathlessness and anaemic. Since the body was anaemic the doctor advised blood transfusion and accordingly as per the advise of the said doctor the complainant approached opposite party No. 1 Blood Bank on 1.9.1997 along with donor Mr. J. Narsing Rao. Opposite party No. 1 after conducting necessary tests informed that the blood of the donor is suitable to the patient and that the blood was good and accordingly issued a Donor Card wherein it was clearly mentioned that H.I.V. I and II Negative. Accordingly opposite party No. 1 Blood Bank collected the blood from the donor, receiv...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (TRI)

N.S.V. Prasad Raju Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

..... of feed could be stored in the shed. as per policy condition no. 13 in case of dispute it should be referred to the arbitrator under the provisions of arbitration act, 1940. the complainant had not submitted any claim for rs. 13,60,933/-. hence there is no deficiency in service. 6. the complainant besides filing his affidavit also filed exs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2003 (HC)

Adapala Chinna Subbaiah (Died) and ors. Vs. Nagendra Hanumantha Rao an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-24-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT743

ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J. 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order and decree, dated 02-12-2002, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Addanki, disposing of the application in I.A. No. 427 of 2002 in O.S. No. 37 of 1985, filed under Order-41 Rule-25 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. Petitioners are defendants and respondents are plaintiffs. The suit was filed for recovery of possession. 3. For the sake of convenience, parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit. 4. Initially, the suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiffs. The matter was carried in appeal in A.S. No. 67 of 1995 and the lower appellate court having gone into the entire evidence on record remanded the matter for fresh disposal with a direction to the trial court to frame an additional issue. 5. It is to be noted that though the suit was filed for recovery of possession, both the parties have relied on independent wills. The will relied on by the plaintiffs is dated 05-12-1979 and the will relied o...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2003 (HC)

S. Seshaiah Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-14-2003

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD307; 2004(2)ALT744

..... initiated against various officials; for the purpose of initiating prosecution under the act and ipc. the definition of 'criminal misconduct' under section 13c of the act and scope of offences under sections 405 - 409 are very wide to take in fold the acts of misappropriation by public servants or conversion of any property entrusted to ..... such circumstances, it cannot be said that there was misappropriation of funds. according to him. investigation and prosecution under the provisions of prevention of corruption act would have arisen, if only there existed proper material. referring to the enquiry report submitted by the team of officials by the government, he ..... them or under their control, for their use. such misconduct or offences, if established, would attract punishments. the act and ipc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2003 (HC)

Dr. N.C.K. Reddy Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Medical, Health and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-2003

Reported in : 2003(4)ALT234

..... 1-9-1980 though he was selected in the year 1978. the learned senior counsel also argued that as per rule 6 of the ap public service commission rules, the section list prepared and published by the commission shall remain in force for a period of one year from the date on which the selection list is published in the notice .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //