Explosive - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata Vs. Initiating Explosives Systems I L ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(128)ECC78; 2008(154)LC78(SC); 2008(224)ELT343(SC)

..... tribunal whereby the tribunal allowed the appeal of the respondent assessee 2 m s initiating explosives systems india ltd the respondent herein had been importing orange shock tube from m s .....

Workmen Umashankar Singh and Forty-four ors. Vs. Management of Indian ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2008(4)JCR628(Jhr)]

order1 this appeal has been preferred against the order dated 13th july 2007 passed by the learned single judge upholding...

C.C.T. Orissa and ors. Vs. Indian Explosives Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC1631; 2008(3)SCALE307; (2008)3SCC688; (2008)14VST1(SC); 2008AIRSCW1815

arijit pasayat j 1 challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a division bench of the orissa high...

The Commissioner of Customs and Vs. Premier Explosives Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

1 revenue has filed this appeal against order in appeal no 152 2004 h iii dated 15 10 2004 passed...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Sua Explosives and Accessories

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

1 this appeal of the revenue is against an order of the commissioner appeals setting aside an order of the...

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. M. Madhusudhan Rao

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(2)ALD917(SC)

..... activities act 1987 c a no 28 1987 sections 12 18 20 a explosive substances act 6 of 1908 section 5 g p mathur g s singhvi ..... court had no jurisdiction to try and convict the accused appellant under the explosive substances act 1908 in view of the fact thagt it could not have ..... was charge sheeted under sections 4 5 and 9b b of the explosives act 1884 no mention of any offence under tada or under the .....

United States Vs. Ressam

Court: US Supreme Court

..... secondary inspection station where another official performed a search of his car the official discovered explosives and related items in the car s spare tire well respondent was subsequently convicted ..... on that circuit precedent the court of appeals in this case concluded that the explosives statute like the firearm statute implicitly included a requirement of a relationship between possession .....

Laxman Prasad Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2009(2)Raj990

..... of section 5 the prosecution was further required to prove that the accused appellant possessing explosive substance under such circumstances which gave rise to reasonable suspicion that he was not using ..... of possession and the existence of circumstances which give rise to reasonable suspicion that such explosive substance possessed by the accused were not for a lawful object lay on the prosecution .....

Begay Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... including state and federal felonies against property such as burglary arson extortion use of explosives and similar crimes as predicate offenses where the conduct involved presents a serious risk ..... crimes committed intentionally such as arson burglary extortion or crimes involving the use of explosives the latter are associated with a likelihood of future violent aggressive and purposeful armed .....

Vijay Kumar Sood Vs. Neeraj Acharya and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(3)ShimLC376

..... examination he has stated that he does not have personal knowledge that explosives were used for demolition of the bridge 9 the defendants have also ..... v k sood contractor in cross examination he has stated that the explosive material was issued from their office on 13 5 1997 he ..... he has also stated that in june 1997 vide rkm shk 115 explosives were supplied but he has not brought the record of supply .....