Explosive - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explosive Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 111 results (0.009 seconds)Dr. Samir Kr. Das Vs. Aparna Das @ Tripti Das
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-09-2000
1 this appeal has been filed under section 28 of the hindu marriage act 1955 against the judgment and decree...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2000
Reported in: (2001)(74)ECC263
..... mining operation and manufacturing process of zinc and lead concentrates are integrated processes and hence explosives used in mining are to be treated as used in the manufacture of zinc concentrates ..... the manufacture of copper concentrates falling under chapter 26 of the tariff they started obtaining explosives without payment of duty from various manufacturers for use in mines to blast rocks and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Krishnaiah Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD72; 2000(4)ALT393; 2001CriLJ2972
..... read with section 149 ipc and under section 3 of the explosive substances act and were sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life ..... under sections 148 149 ipc andsections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act the convict was convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment ..... with section 149 ipc and sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act he was convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJones Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-22-2000
..... word is used congress did not define the crime as the explosion of a building whose damage or destruction might affect interstate ..... i to insert the words fire or before the words an explosive the house report accompanying the 1982 legislation explained that the original ..... measure which was confined to damage caused by an explosive had resulted in problems of practical application h r rep .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Associated Cement Companies Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-04-2000
Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT146TriDel
..... excise appeals in the impugned order the benefit in respect of explosives used in the mines for obtaining lime stone for the manufacture ..... of the respondents submits that in one case mines where the explosives is used is almost 11 kms away from the factory he ..... adjoining the factory of the appellants his contention is that the explosives used in the mines which are adjoining the factory where cement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Karim Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others Etc. Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-07-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)ALD(Cri)12; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)14; 2001CriLJ148; 2000(7)SCALE313; [2000]Supp4SCR382
..... are being continued and the charges under the arms act and explosive substances act to certain extent cover the provisions of section ..... the designated court in cases arising under the tada act the explosive substances act the indian penal code and the arms act ..... other penal provisions i e indian penal code arms act and explosive substances act d from their source information police authorities had .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJeet Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-15-2000
Reported in: JT2001(2)SC70; (2000)9SCC588
..... witnesses accordingly he reached the conclusion that both the appellants were in possession of those explosive substances mentioned above and hence they are guilty of the offence under section 5 of ..... too many methods if they wanted to concoct a case without procuring such costly and explosive substances 11 bestowing our anxious consideration on the arguments forcefully addressed by the learned senior .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDes Raj Taneja Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-28-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ3393
..... of fire works in large quantity without licence under section 4 1 of the act explosives include the fire works also section 5 authorises the central government to make rules regulating ..... and prohibiting the manufacture and possession of explosives except under and in accordance with the conditions of the licence granted section 6 also .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Ravichandran and Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ2021
..... umma and its active members were arrested and large quantity of explosives were seized from them thereafter three incidents have been relied ..... 1999 was registered for offences under section 3 of the explosives substances act and section 436 ipc and taken up for ..... said confessions that it was mohammed kamil who has masterminded the explosion of bombs in chennai along with jahir hussain scientist and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Diamond Cement
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2000
Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT777TriDel
..... the impugned order the benefit of modvat credit in respect of explosives used in mines and in respect of hydra zine hydrate used ..... scope of show cause notice in respect of modvat credit on explosives used in the manufacture of cement he reiterated the findings of ..... commissioner appeals allowed the benefit of modvat credit in respect of explosives used in the mines the larger bench in the case of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial