Exclude - Judgment Search Results

Gray Vs. Mississippi

Court: US Supreme Court

..... was required to exhaust his peremptory challenges because the trial judge erroneously refused to exclude other jurors for cause despite their unequivocal opposition to the death penalty post at ..... surely does not mean that prosecutors violate the constitution by using peremptory challenges to exclude such people since defendants presumably use their peremptory challenges in the opposite fashion the .....

Lukhard Vs. Reed

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the difference in treatment violates hhs regulation requiring that eligibility conditions imposed must not exclude individuals or groups on an arbitrary or unreasonable basis and must not result in ..... secretary s equitable treatment regulation which states that the eligibility conditions imposed must not exclude individuals or groups on an arbitrary or unreasonable basis and must not result in .....

Government of India - in Revision Vs. G.M.C. Brothers and Co.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (1988)(16)LC537Tri(Kol.)kata

..... scope of licences issued under the paragraph 30 as to exclude spares components which are classifiable under other headings in that ..... for import of items appearing in appendices 5 and 7 excluding however the items appearing in appendix 26 and subject to the ..... the scope of licence issued under para 30 as to exclude spares components which are classifiable under other headings correct appendices 3 .....

Buchanan Vs. Kentucky

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sentencing with the first not being death qualified death qualification occurs when prospective jurors are excluded for cause in light of their stated inability to set aside their strong opposition to ..... case similar reasoning applies in the context of petitioner s joint trial for the witherspoon excludables would not have been able to assess properly the appropriateness of imposing the death penalty .....

Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(13)ECC226

..... in the tariff which covered all other goods not elsewhere specified excluding 2 by another amendment in 1980 the following explanation was added ..... is observed in the present case dross skimmings ash have been excluded from the definition of waste scrap and are thus not ..... if they are excisable goods the definition of waste and scrap excludes dross and skimmings and there is considerable force in the .....

Dr. Rajah Sir M.A. Muthiah Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in: (1987)22ITD62(Mad.)

..... since the entire 1 3rd share of the late kumararaja stood excluded from the assets of the huf the entire estate duty liability corresponding ..... to the said 1 3rd share when the wto proposed to exclude the asset 1 3rd share of the deceased from its wealth the ..... following such exclusion logically and legally the assessee itself should have excluded the estate duty liability relating to that 1 3rd share also the .....

Wealth-tax Officer Vs. Smt. Gita Abhyankar

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)23ITD83(Delhi)

..... wealth tax officer in the assessment aggrieved by this order of the appellate assistant commissioner excluding the value of the jewellery the revenue filed an appeal before the tribunal raising the ..... learned accountant member sought to justify the conclusion of the learned appellate assistant commissioner to exclude the value of the jewellery on the ground that the status of the assessee should .....

V.S. Ramani Vs. S.R. Vasudevan and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1988)1MLJ264

..... contended that the aforesaid term in the policy does not expressly exclude a learner and that therefore we must construe the aforesaid ..... licence can be equated to regular licence whether the policy conditions exclude the conditions of the learner s licence when in force whether ..... be equated to a regular licence 2 whether the policy conditions exclude the liability when a learner s licence is in force 3 .....

Kentucky Vs. Stincer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... pretrial proceeding subject to the confrontation clause s requirements the more useful inquiry is whether excluding the defendant from the hearing interferes with his opportunity for cross examination no such ..... hearing as a trial or pretrial proceeding it is more useful to consider whether excluding the defendant from the hearing interferes with his opportunity for effective cross examination no .....

K. Anbazhagan and ors. Vs. the Secretary,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1988Mad275

..... the operation of the selective service laws the house of representatives excluded him from the house and declared his seat vacant julian bond ..... in art 1 cl 2 of the constitution and thus had excluded him unconstitutionally it was not disputed that he satisfied all the ..... therefore the house of representatives has been held without sic to exclude from its membership a person who has been duly elected as .....