Exclude - Judgment Search Results

Merrion Vs. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... over nonmembers though those nonmembers have no voice in tribal government since a tribe may exclude nonmembers entirely from tribal territory the tribe necessarily may impose conditions on a right of ..... over nonmembers nevertheless those same treaties often specifically recognized the right of the tribe to exclude nonmembers from the reservation or to attach conditions on their entry see e g treaty .....

Royal Calcutta Turf Club Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1983)33CTR(Cal)208,[1983]144ITR709(Cal)

..... exempt the income profits or gains or does it exclude the business if it excludes the business the appellant is right in saying that ..... establishing that the proviso clearly and without any ambiguity excludes the baroda business we agree with the high court that ii there ..... breeding or poultry or dairy farming it does not exclude the business of livestock breeding or poultry or dairy faming from .....

Cabell Vs. Chavez-salido

Court: US Supreme Court

..... jobs the court s novel standard of review condones a legislative classification that excludes aliens from more than 70 public occupations although citizenship cannot be even rationally required ..... deemed appropriate only for statutes deriving from a state s historical power to exclude aliens from participation in its democratic political institutions or its constitutional responsibility for the .....

Landon Vs. Plasencia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is directed to determine whether the alien shall be allowed to enter or shall be excluded and deported following an exclusion hearing the ins denied respondent a permanent resident alien admission ..... to determine whether respondent was attempting to enter the united states and whether she was excludable the language and history of the act both clearly reflect a congressional intent that whether .....

Loretto Vs. Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... exclusivity of a physical occupation distinguish it from temporary limitations on the right to exclude not every physical invasion is a taking as pruneyard shopping center v robins 447 ..... of appeals noted testimony preceding the enactment of 828 that the landlord s interest in excluding cable installation consists entirely of insisting that some negligible unoccupied space remain unoccupied 53 .....

Board of Educ. Vs. Rowley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... degree of self sufficiency after referring to statistics showing that many handicapped children were excluded from public education the senate report states the long range implications of these ..... majority reads this statutory language as establishing a congressional intent limited to bringing previously excluded handicapped children into the public education systems of the states and requiring the .....

Odeon Mani Tiraiarangam, Represented by Its Partner, M. Rajasekharan a ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1983)2MLJ392

..... as panchayats under different notifications under the tamil nadu panchayats act and unless they are excluded from that act there cannot be any valid declaration under clause 9 of section 3 ..... affected panchayats in challenging the notifications contended that the areas in question should first be excluded from the panchayats under the provisions of the panchayats act and there alter alone they .....

Geep Industrial Syndicate Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1982(10)ELT857(All)

..... is levied only on the amount representing the manufacturing cost plus the manufacturing profit and excludes post manufacturing cost and the profit arising from post manufacturing operation namely selling profit ..... market by the same interpretative exercise packing material manufactured by the manufacturer were also excluded the result of adopting such a procedure would not be reading down section 4 .....

Deputy Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Panchayat and Community Dev. D ...

Court: Guwahati

..... of prior notice and hearing under section 136 stands impliedly excluded the learned advocate general has relied on a division bench ..... that in the latter action audi alteram partem rule was excluded by necessary implication but the rule of interpretation certainly requires ..... 1972 gauhati 41 supra which held that the section which had excluded the application of the audi alteram partem rule was not .....

North Haven Bd. of Educ. Vs. Bell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... employees as well as students under that provision employees like other persons may not be excluded from participation in denied the benefits of or subjected to discrimination under education programs receiving ..... of the civil rights act of 1964 with respect to employment practices title vi specifically excludes employment from coverage except where the primary objective of the federal aid is to .....