Skip to content


Exceed - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: exceed Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 600 results (0.105 seconds)
Sep 18 2002 (HC)

Satbir Singh and ors. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2002

Reported in: 100(2002)DLT85; 2003(66)DRJ775

be construed as remaining in effect as a qualification or exception to the general law of course there is no rule

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 13 2002 (HC)

Balbir Singh and ors., Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-13-2002

Reported in: 2003(66)DRJ799

s b sinha c j 1 these three writ petitions involving common questions of law and fact were taken up...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 2002 (TRI)

Mega Resources Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Mar-19-2002

..... dyeing that the holding of the appellant alongwith its associate had exceeded 5 and as such information was given as required under the ..... in the regulation excludes an acquirer whose individual holding does not exceed 5 from complying with the requirement of the regulation in ..... in the regulation he shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding five thousand rupees for every day during which such failure .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 20 2002 (TRI)

Nb Jaffar Ali Khan Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Sep-20-2002

Reported in: (2003)87ITD359(Hyd.)

..... requirement of obtaining report of a registered valuer for value of jewellery exceeding rs 5 lakhs rule 18 of schedule iii to the wealth ..... where the value of the jewellery on the valuation date does not exceed rupees five lakhs ii a report of a registered valuer in ..... 89 which is the immediately preceding assessment year as the wealth exceeded rs 5 lakhs their cases have to be considered under rule .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 2002 (TRI)

Kalindee Rail Nirman (Engineers) Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Decided on: Sep-05-2002

Reported in: (2003)78TTJ(JP.)653

..... the case it was also pointed out that the auditors have exceeded their statutory authority while making observations on the system of ..... from the contract receipts should not be estimated at a rate exceeding 11 per cent in his explanation the assessee pointed out ..... was also pointed out in that letter that the auditors have exceeded their statutory authority while making observations on the system of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 05 2002 (HC)

Kothapalli Sreeramulu and Company and ors. Vs. Krishna Gur and Khandas ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-05-2002

Reported in: 2003(3)ALD319; 2003(3)ALT360

..... or interest c leases of immovable property for any term not exceeding one year and leases exempted under section 17 cc instruments ..... then the question is where the lease for a term not exceeding one year was effected by oral agreement accompanied by delivery of ..... is an oral lease of immovable property for a term not exceeding one year accompanied by delivery of possession and subsequently the terms .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 2002 (HC)

Bharatkumar Amratlal Shah and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-16-2002

Reported in: (2002)3GLR816

..... chief metropolitan magistrate or chief judicial magistrate would not be entitled to impose imprisonment exceeding six years though sub section 1 of section 29 authorizes the chief judicial ..... magistrate to impose imprisonment for the term not exceeding seven years the chief metropolitan magistrate and chief judicial magistrate therefore shall have limit .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 2002 (HC)

Duken Hengra Tea Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Sep-04-2002

..... two groups package tea packed in unit containers of content not exceeding 25 gms and ordinarily intended for sale to consumers in ..... and package tea packed in unit containers of content exceeding 25 gms but not exceeding 20 kgs whether or not ordinarily intended for ..... kg 0902 12packed in unit containers of content exceeding 25 gram but not exceeding 20 kilograms whether or not ordinarily intended for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 2002 (HC)

Government of A.P. and anr. Vs. Sri Venkateswara Construction Co., Kak ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: May-16-2002

Reported in: 2002(5)ALD142

..... arbitrator gravely erred in allowing the claims of the contractor the learned arbitrator had exceeded the jurisdiction and awarded various amounts he further submits that the learned arbitrator allowed ..... superintending engineer notifying while granting extension that no compensation will be allowed the arbitrators exceeded their jurisdiction in granting the claim 15 however in the present case there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 2002 (HC)

A. Aruna and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-01-2002

Reported in: 2002(6)ALD548; 2003(2)ALT770

..... the category of two wheelers there was further classification into vehicles not exceeding 60 cc and vehicles exceeding 60 cc thefour wheelers were classified into three categories on the basis ..... and jeeps and other non transport vehicles otherthan omnibuses not exceeding 2286 kgs in ulw vehicles not exceeding 60 ccvehicles exceeding 60 cc weighing not more than 500 kgs ulwweighing more .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //