Exceed - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: exceed Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 599 results (0.142 seconds)Sua Explosives and Accessories Ltd. and anr. Vs. S. Kumars Nationwide ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-14-2001
Reported in: 2002(25)PTC384(SC)
syed shah mohammed quadri j 1 heard mr r f nariman learned senior counsel for the petitioners and mr c...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSh O.P. Ahuja Vs. Controller of Estate Duty
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2001
Reported in: 2001IVAD(Delhi)461; 91(2001)DLT364; 2001(59)DRJ46
orderarijit pasayat c j 1 at the instance of sh o p ahuja hereinafter referred to as the accountable person...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaj. Kapil Mohan L/R of Shri N.N. Mohan Vs. the Controller of Estate D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2001
Reported in: 2001(59)DRJ599
orderd k jain j 1 in these two cross references under section 64 1 of the estate duty act 1953...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTController of Estate Duty Vs. Smt. Nirmala Bhandari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2001
Reported in: 2001IIIAD(Delhi)283; 91(2001)DLT213; 2001(58)DRJ383
death but shall not be liable for any duty in excess of the assets of the deceased which he actually received
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKasi M. Vs. Management of Indian Bank and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-13-2001
Reported in: (2001)IILLJ617Mad
..... 25 1978 whereas the overdraft facility was given prior to this circular finding the overdrafts exceeded beyond the discretionary powers the defence that the circular was subsequent was not considered 2 ..... powers indiscriminately without taking into consideration the merits of the parties and similarly you had exceeded o c c limits you had also accepted hospitality from one of the constitutents and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Arun Kumar Bajoria
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Jul-04-2001
Reported in: (2001)107CompCas535
..... informed the company that its shareholding along with its associates had exceeded 5 percent of the shares in the company in addition the ..... had indicated the date on which he and his associates had exceeded 5 per cent shares and had also not furnished the details ..... date the company should have been aware that the respondents had exceeded 5 per cent for this contention he relied on various provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovt. of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. Mohd. Ghouse MohinuddIn and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-27-2001
Reported in: 2001VIAD(SC)734; AIR2001SC3424; [2001(91)FLR434]; JT2001(7)SC146; 2001LabIC3304; 2001(5)SCALE491; (2001)8SCC416; 2001(3)SCT1147(SC); 2001(3)SLJ479(SC)
..... that district carrying a scale of pay of minimum of which does not exceed the minimum of the scale of pay of junior assistant or a ..... minimum of the scale of pay of a junior assistant but does not exceed rs 480 per mensem provided that where a single cadre has been ..... comprising posts carrying a scale of pay the minimum of which does not exceed the minimum of the scale of pay of a junior assistant or a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Jalgaon Janta Sahakari Bank Vs. Hrishikesh Prabhakar Kulkarni
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Aug-27-2001
..... june 26 1997 annexure ii percent per annum i current accounts not exceeding 0 5ii savings accounts 4 5iii term deposits a 30 days upto ..... bondre reported as 1998 ctj 321 cp ncdrc the bank could not exceed the ceiling on the rate of interest fixed by the rbi the ..... one year not exceeding bank rate minus 2percentage points i e not exceeding8 0 per cent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHigh Court of Madhya Pradesh Thru. Registrar and ors. Vs. Satya Naraya ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-14-2001
Reported in: 2001VIAD(SC)179; AIR2001SC3234; 2002(50)BLJR450; [2001(91)FLR626]; JT2001(6)SC368; 2001LabIC3281; 2001(5)SCALE233; (2001)7SCC161; 2001(3)SCT1114(SC); 2001(2)LC1281(SC)
..... so that the total period of probation including extension does not exceed three years explanation to rule 7 1 provided that the ..... reasons extend the period of probation by a further period not exceeding one year note a probationer whose period of probation is not ..... provided that the total period of probation including extension shall not exceed three vears in anv case 32 there the person was promoted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.K. Udaipur Udhyog Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-11-2001
Reported in: [2003]131STC176(Raj); 2003(1)WLN281
..... fixed capital investment in cases where such investment does not exceed rs 150 00 lacs eleven years5pioneering units prestigious units exporting ..... during the period of scheme having a fixed capital investment exceeding rs 3 crores and minimum regular employment of 50 ..... which envisages the industrial unit which has fixed capital investment exceeding 150 crores with a minimum regular employment of 500 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial