Skip to content

Did you mean: bye elections?


Ex Relations - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: ex relations Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 607 results (0.136 seconds)
Mar 22 2002 (HC)

Employers in Relation to the Management of Flaritand Colliery of Bccl ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-22-2002

Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1351; [2002(94)FLR644]; (2002)IIILLJ175Jhar

or affirm the judgment decree or order appealed against while exercising its appellate jurisdiction and not while exercising the discretionary jurisdiction 26 7 2001 the appellant has mainly taken the ground relating to the identification of the workmen and submission of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 2002 (HC)

Bank Karmachari Sangh Vs. Assistant Registrar Under Bombay Industrial ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-13-2002

Reported in: [2002(95)FLR1014]; (2002)IIILLJ810Bom

deprecated by apex court labour matters must be decided as expeditiously as possible all points including preliminary issues should be decided of trade unions sections 16 and 23 of bombay industrial relations act 1946 petitioner was registered trade union application under sections

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 09 2002 (HC)

K.R. Natarajan Vs. Personnel Manager, Syndicate Bank, Industrial Relat ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-09-2002

Reported in: 2002(6)ALD365; (2003)ILLJ384AP

or implied if the note appended to the policy is examined on the basis of this principle it is evident that in the year 1981 added a note to the provision relating to award of marks for educational qualifications as under note

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 2002 (HC)

Employer in Relation to Management of Balihari Colliery of Bccl Vs. th ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-29-2002

Reported in: 2003(51)BLJR313; [2004(3)JCR265(Jhr)]

basis of evidence on record the tribunal held that the existence of the co operative societies aforesaid was nothing but camouflage a finding of fact that there existed employer and employees relationship between the management and the workmen concerned was recorded which

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 2002 (HC)

Employees in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and D ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-29-2002

Reported in: 2003(1)BLJR313; [2003(1)JCR409(Jhr)]; (2003)IILLJ1139Jhar

being a creature of statute respondent no 1 tribunal is expected to act within the four corners of the act 10 in the finding of the tribunal with regard to the relationship of employer and employee between the petitioner and the workmen

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 22 2002 (HC)

Employers in Relation to the Management of Amlabad Colliery of Bccl Vs ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-22-2002

Reported in: [2004(2)JCR95(Jhr)]

155 total rs 500 was shown thereon there is no explanation as to why the name of md zubair was mentioned refused 4 on behalf of md zubair alam no document relating to his appointment as regular employee of the colliery was

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 2002 (HC)

Employers in Relation to the Management of Bastacolla Colliery of B.B. ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-27-2002

Reported in: [2004(1)JCR326(Jhr)]

ansari jj appeal without statutory deposit but within limitation or extended period of limitation maintainability held if the provision of a 173 of the act does not extend to the provision relating to the deposit of statutory amount as embodies in the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 16 2002 (HC)

Employees in Relation to the Management of Murulidih Colliery Under Mo ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-16-2002

Reported in: [2003(96)FLR292]

took into consideration the original order dated 1st august 1979 exhibit m 6 was never produced by the union nor at the employer has not produced evidences to prove employer employee relationship in this context one may also refer the decision of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 2002 (HC)

Ram Naresh Singh Vs. Employers in Relation to the Management of Hec an ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-17-2002

Reported in: [2003(1)JCR229(Jhr)]

finding that the persons who were given promotion pursuant to ext a will not in any way be treated senior to 173 of the act does not extend to the provision relating to the deposit of statutory amount as embodies in the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 2002 (HC)

Workmen of Nirsa Area of Ecf Ltd. Vs. Employers in Relation to the Man ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Oct-04-2002

Reported in: [2003(96)FLR665]

was made in 1989 from these facts and also from ext 173 of the act does not extend to the provision relating to the deposit of statutory amount as embodies in the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //