Equalization - Judgment Search Results

Bi-metallic Investment Co. Vs. State Board of Equalization

Court: US Supreme Court

..... page 239 u s 442 an order of the state board of equalization of colorado increasing the valuation of all taxable property in the ..... the court this is a suit to enjoin the state board of equalization and the colorado tax commission from putting in force and the ..... be heard before a matter can be decided in which all are equally concerned here for instance before a superior board decides that the local .....

In Re: K. Parameswara Nambudri

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1916Mad72; 31Ind.Cas.161

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

Samu Pathan Vs. Chidambara Odayan

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1916Mad480; 31Ind.Cas.179

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

Ramalingam Pillai, Agent of Two Minors of Late Chittoorsami thevar Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1916Mad640(2); 31Ind.Cas.176

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

Chemikkala Chinna Bali and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1916Mad1168(1); 31Ind.Cas.176a

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

In Re: Bapu Naidu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1916Mad732(2); 31Ind.Cas.175

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

Coppage Vs. Kansas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of fortune and thus it naturally happens that parties negotiating about a contract are not equally unhampered by circumstances this applies to all contracts and not merely to that between employer ..... corroborated that the proprietors of these establishments and their operatives do not stand upon an equality and that their interests are to a certain extent conflicting the former naturally desire to .....

Phoenix Ins. Co. Vs. Mcmaster

Court: US Supreme Court

..... contended deprived the company of its property without due process of law and violated the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the united states the supreme ..... judgment of the supreme court of south carolina is contended for is based upon the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment because of the alleged discriminatory action of the commissioner .....

Woodward Vs. De Graffenried

Court: US Supreme Court

..... made for determining what lands were susceptible of allotment and for equalizing the value of allotments page 238 u s 288 no ..... treasury of the united states and used for the purpose of equalizing the allotments with respect to value the commission say in ..... 238 u s 311 contemplated temporary allotments intended to be approximately equal to what each citizen would get from final allotment meanwhile the .....

Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry. Co. Vs. Vosburg

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which involve the constitutionality of the reciprocal demurrage law of kansas of 1905 under the equal protection provision of the fourteenth amendment are stated in the opinion mr justice pitney ..... plaintiffs only and not to successful defendants does not render the statute repugnant to the equal protection clause this is not a discrimination between different citizens or classes of citizens .....